How? Last year we were 7-3 and ranked and kept winning and that narrative was still there because we didn't have any big wins.Or, don't lost to Akron, ISU, NIU etc. I've actually seen a lot of ND fans give NU a lot of credit and say they are the toughest game remaining. If we hadn't lost that debacle against Akron then we would be 6-2 with a respectable loss to Duke and a hard fought loss to Michigan. The narrative would be different.
If we had beaten Akron, we'd be 6-2 and ranked but in the same spot as last year. Literally an identical narrative to last year. Losses to good teams and Duke.
My point is: big wins matter way more than bad losses. If you don't have big wins, you're just another team that people say "well look who they beat, a bunch of mediocre teams"...
If we beat ND, we'll be a top 20 team and nobody will care about the Akron loss. The only things people will talk about is the ND win and whether we win the division.
Nobody cared in '95 that we lost to Miami after we beat Michigan and Penn State. Nobody in '96 cared that we lost to Wake Forest after we beat Michigan again.
Or compare 2015 to 2017 when even with the 2 blowout losses, we had tons of respect late in the season from that Stanford win (they finished #3). Of course we lost plenty of that in the bowl game.