Definitely some eye brow raisers. Teams just beating up on each other.I find it funny that Iowa has lost 4 of their last 5 and is still ranked 15th. Of course it should not be any shock that Duke got throttled by Pitt and only dropped one spot. I also find it amusing that UNC is ranked 8th but Lunardi has them as a 1 seed in the updated bracketology.
Par for the course.Can't believe we dropped that far and Puke drops one spot.
That ranking is a joke. Media bias against the SEC, is all that is.
Can't believe we dropped that far and Puke drops one spot.
That ranking is a joke. Media bias against the SEC, is all that is.
Can't complain, we blew our chances to move up several times. We lost 3-4 games we had no business losing.
Duke only dropped 1 spot and we dropped 5? They were thoroughly dominated by Pitt from the opening tip. We hung with Vandy the entire game. Even led at halftime. I wonder if the idiot voters even watch the games.
Pitt - Kenpom #40
Vandy - Kenpom #23
Sad thing is, the selection committee leans on the polls for their seeding justifications. IU at #12, with its pathetic SOS of 108, RPI 27. Clear bias at work here. UK RPI at 15, SOS at 26.
Iowa is 5-6 against the top 50, UK is 7-3.
With the season melting into a quagmire of mediocrity, all the media voters have to guide them is their bias. The Big Ten is better than the SEC, therefore we'll pump them up in the polls.
I find it funny that Iowa has lost 4 of their last 5 and is still ranked 15th. Of course it should not be any shock that Duke got throttled by Pitt and only dropped one spot. I also find it amusing that UNC is ranked 8th but Lunardi has them as a 1 seed in the updated bracketology.
Duke only dropped 1 spot and we dropped 5? They were thoroughly dominated by Pitt from the opening tip. We hung with Vandy the entire game. Even led at halftime. I wonder if the idiot voters even watch the games.
Pitt - Kenpom #40
Vandy - Kenpom #23
Except they're overrated in both.Yeah, that is a big gap having UNC a 1 seed while them being ranked 8th. But, that is not nearly as big of a gap as having UK a 3 seed while being ranked 22.
Good point.WE hung with VANDY? You mean they hung with us before finally putting it away on our drought from everyone other than Murray...
Every big 12 team is over-rated by atleast 5 spots. Iowa St. has lost 5 of 9 while 3 of those wins r against the crap of the big 12 (OSU, TCU, KSU). They lost to Tex A&M & gave up 97 & 100 points in 2 of those losses. Texas loses & moves up. That poll is awful. Their r teams in the high teens better than the top 5.
that's what kills me - why do other schools get consideration when THEY lost a starting player?At least 3 times this season, we have lost a game that should have put us back into the top 10. Kansas, A&M, Vandy. I think we are underrated, especially when Willis is back. Without Willis 18-22 is probably about right.
Definitely some eye brow raisers. Teams just beating up on each other.