So if UNCC gave every student an ounce of cocaine it'd be OK? Sound logic.... Honestly, as bad as UL's actions were this is worse IMO. Systematic fraud for 20 years. This gotta lead to changes or the death of the NCAA.
Or explain the other students who were not athletes also taking these easy classes to improve their GPA?
This. There is literally no point to even having sham classes now, because what are we gonna start deciding which sham is shammier??? Disband the NCAA, let colleges pay what they want out in the open under the guise of a job in admissions, and be done with this garbage.
And you don't think this doesn't already happen at almost every University with a major sports program?
Have you been to college? If so, are you going to tell me you didn't know which courses or professors were easy and would help raise your GPA. This is usually common knowledge among students at most colleges.
Again, we can debate whether easy classes is a good or bad thing. We can also debate whether the how student athlete deal is a sham and whether we should just start paying student athletes. But the point here is that this was outside the jurisdiction of the NCAA. The student athletes were not receiving any benefit from these classes that non-student athletes were not receiving. That is the key point and what so many people want to ignore.
I may be done with it...just about as authentic a sport as WWFCollege basketball is nothing but a cheating mess, the ncaa is the biggest cheater in the game.
And you don't think this doesn't already happen at almost every University with a major sports program?
Have you been to college? If so, are you going to tell me you didn't know which courses or professors were easy and would help raise your GPA. This is usually common knowledge among students at most colleges.
Again, we can debate whether easy classes are a good or bad thing. We can also debate whether the how student athlete deal is a sham and whether we should just start paying student athletes. But the point here is that this was outside the jurisdiction of the NCAA. The student athletes were not receiving any benefit from these classes that non-student athletes were not receiving. That is the key point and what so many people want to ignore.
And you don't think this doesn't already happen at almost every University with a major sports program?
Have you been to college? If so, are you going to tell me you didn't know which courses or professors were easy and would help raise your GPA. This is usually common knowledge among students at most colleges.
Again, we can debate whether easy classes are a good or bad thing. We can also debate whether the how student athlete deal is a sham and whether we should just start paying student athletes. But the point here is that this was outside the jurisdiction of the NCAA. The student athletes were not receiving any benefit from these classes that non-student athletes were not receiving. That is the key point and what so many people want to ignore.
Cheating pays kids! ... I think i'm done with this B.S. NCAA special treatment, I'm done with college ball,
no point ... one team gets away with this big of an advantage for 25 years.
you can find all my UK gear cheap at my nearest Goodwill in east louisville ... SERIOUS
My facebook post:
I hope you get banned again.I came to this board back in March and told you guys this was going to happen. You laughed at me, told me I was crazy, didn't listen to the facts, attacked me, and then banned me.
Maybe next time, you will listen to reason instead of going off emotion.
Anyone who took the time to look at the facts here and consider the legal ramifications would have known this would be the outcome.
Jay Bilas has been saying this too for a while and no one listened to him either.
Why do you keep referring to "easy" courses? What went on at unc*** was sham courses. No attendance, no class work, fake grades, and a paper turned in at the end of the semester. Yes, every school offers easy courses. Not every school offers "the Carolina Way" courses.
If this is the case, then what's to stop any college from just making real stupid classes for athletes and non athletes, which just oh so happens to make athletes eligible? SACS will wag their finger but they won't do anything. So are you in agreement that every college should do what UNC did?
This article alone tells you how corrupt the NCAA is...
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/news/story?id=1750279
Most college students dream of getting a final exam with
questions such as: How many points is a 3-pointer worth?
That was among the questions on basic basketball knowledge on
the final exam -- and only test -- in Georgia assistant basketball
coach Jim Harrick Jr.'s Coaching Principles and Strategies of
Basketball class in 2001.
The 20-question test and transcripts of interviews with some of
the students in Harrick's class were among 1,500 pages of documents
released Wednesday by the university in its response to the NCAA
about rules violations in the basketball program.
The university agreed with the NCAA's findings, which included
violations of academic fraud and improper benefits.
Harrick's father, Jim Sr., was suspended, then resigned as
coach. The younger Harrick lost his job as an assistant, and the
school kept the team out of the Southeastern Conference and NCAA
tournaments.
The NCAA concluded Harrick Jr. "fraudulently awarded grades of
A to three men's basketball student-athletes" enrolled in the
course he taught in 2001, allowing them to miss class and tests.
Harrick Jr. also allegedly provided an extra benefit to student
athletes by the manner in which he conducted the course, the NCAA
found.
An attorney for the Harricks said Wednesday that Harrick Jr.
would not comment. A federal lawsuit filed last week accuses
university officials and others of defamation.
The names of Harrick's students who were interviewed were
blacked out in the papers.
All the students in the class were given an A grade, according
to the documents.
No. I am simply saying what ever lawyer will tell you, what the NCAA has now said, what individuals like Jay Bilas have been saying, etc.
This was outside the jurisdiction of the NCAA. There was no illegal "benefit" given to student athletes that non-student athletes did not also receive. I am sorry if you can't accept the truth.
I know it hurts that UNC beat UK and won the title, but that is sports. This deals with laws and the legal system, and the NCAA knew this was outside their jurisdiction.
No. I am simply saying what ever lawyer will tell you, what the NCAA has now said, what individuals like Jay Bilas have been saying, etc.
This was outside the jurisdiction of the NCAA. There was no illegal "benefit" given to student athletes that non-student athletes did not also receive. I am sorry if you can't accept the truth.
You ignored the part of my post that shows inconsistency in your argument. But your fanbase has had their heads in the sand for the better part of three decades now, so that's not surprising.
We all read the allegations and the findings and the rulings. You repeating it back to us doesn't mean you're explaining anything new.
We're arguing that it's bogus (like the classes your student-athletes took), because it's inconsistent with previous NCAA rulings, doesn't at all address the allegation of a lack of institutional control (where an athletic department "has no idea" their athletes are being steered to fraudulent courses for 20 years, or knows and doesn't stop it), and undermines the very fabric of what the NCAA pretends to stand for. If this isn't in their jurisdiction, there is no jurisdiction.
But you know all that already. You just don't care because your school escaped the punishment they deserve, and, being a UNC fan, had rather laud that over rivals than be disgusted that an institution that exists primarily to educate chose to sacrifice its integrity to try and catch Kentucky and stave off Duke--and still failed.
I believe I read where it was 53% non athletes to 47% athletes. I'm sure these percentages match the ratio for the entire campus...you're a liar by omissionAgain, if you would read the NCAA release, you would see that all students (student athletes and non-student athletes) took those easy classes. Indeed, a majority of those who took the classes were non-student athletes. The classes also were not formed to help only student athletes. Therefore, there is no violations of improper benefits to a student athlete.
This was always an academic issue. It was within the jurisdiction of the academic accreditation association, not the NCAA. And UNC has already been punished by the accreditation association. This was completely outside the jurisdiction of the NCAA.
Get mad at me all you want and call me names but I'm just trying to explain what is really going on here separate from the emotions of sports.
No. I am simply saying what ever lawyer will tell you, what the NCAA has now said, what individuals like Jay Bilas have been saying, etc.
This was outside the jurisdiction of the NCAA. There was no illegal "benefit" given to student athletes that non-student athletes did not also receive. I am sorry if you can't accept the truth.
I know it hurts that UNC beat UK and won the title, but that is sports. This deals with laws and the legal system, and the NCAA knew this was outside their jurisdiction.
I think I'm done with this ********. I can't enjoy college sports anymore knowing it is run by a totally corrupt organization. Time to find something else to do.
Here’s the thing that people are missing about UNC, especially when it comes to other incidents such as Louisville, Memphis, etc. Nowhere are there requirements written about what a class or major must consist of. The NCAA does not dictate that a course must have five tests throughout a semester or that a degree actually be useful in the real world, that’s determined by the universities themselves. Derrick Rose possibly cheated on an SAT. That was done away from the university and violated specific rules for that standardized test that are followed by students and universities all over the country. Louisville paid players to come to their school. This is expressly forbidden by the NCAA’s rules.
Unfortunately, in this case there are no rules about the quality of education a “student-athlete” must receive or how rigorous their studies have to be. Does that mean this whole scheme wasn’t unethical? Absolutely not. It also highlights the absurdity of the Carolina Way BS they’ve shoveled for years. The problem is that at the end of the day they found a loophole in the system that hasn’t been closed yet. Carolina has basically sacrificed the reputation and validity of their academic status in order to make college easier for their athletes, the question now is will other universities decide to do the same?
The "truth" is that the NCAA had already set precedent in punishing a school outside the academic sphere in the Penn State case. There were no academic transgressions there whatsoever. Your argument is as flawed as the NCAA's .
Also, why did UNCheat even establish these fake classes if not to benefit athletes? Sure, it was carefully concealed but, it was still cheating and everyone knows it.
Raise all the banners you like but, UNCheat and Dean Smith are cheaters in the mind of most college basketball fans.
...and once challenged the NCAA had to undo what they had initially done. I never agreed with the NCAA having authority over PSU's situation. And in the end neither did the NCAA.
UNC created the fake classes....for everyone...in order to serve a specific "under-served" community. This is common at most universities these days. UNC did not exclude non student athletes so it was a systemic problem that had to do with academics....then athletes in that "under-served" community simply gravitated to them.