NCAA question

JungRebel

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2012
2,606
0
0
Putting aside how the OM administration handled the investigation, and putting aside the lack of institutional control charge, for anyone who can make the comparison: how much have schools been punished that cheated similarly to how Ole Miss did? How were the coaches who got 'failure to monitor' treated? And if the LOIC sticks, what is the least a program has ever gotten for it?
 

missouridawg

Junior
Oct 6, 2009
9,407
309
83
Death penalty. The only school ever accused of cheating as rampantly as OM was SMU.

Under the new penalty matrix, you guys are far and away the most egregious violators.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,028
113
Here's a fairly similar case involving Syracuse basketball. Biggest difference is they self-reported everything and I don't think they had as many different violations.

Link
 

PBRME

All-American
Feb 12, 2004
11,615
5,802
113
We got Sylvester Croom. Why you ask? Because you shitheads hired pi's, slept with investigators, and had your players take immunity and testify against us. Paybacks a mother 17er.
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,718
343
83
It's hard to compare with the new matrix in place but it is clear that the focus

now is going after coaches and boosters hard where that was not the case in the past. I have said since the beginning that this case would end up similar to USC which lost 30 schollies but there should also be multiple show causes and another year on the bowl ban I believe due to the high number of allegations, their severity and Ole Miss's protect Freeze at all cost strategy.
 

QuadrupleOption

All-Conference
Aug 21, 2012
1,297
1,441
93
Putting aside how the OM administration handled the investigation, and putting aside the lack of institutional control charge, for anyone who can make the comparison: how much have schools been punished that cheated similarly to how Ole Miss did? How were the coaches who got 'failure to monitor' treated? And if the LOIC sticks, what is the least a program has ever gotten for it?
Ole Miss has the 'honor' of being the first school in football to go before the COI under the new matrix. It's also odd because some of the charges will be using the old standards, so anything under Nutt's watch will fall there.

As far as the 'failure to monitor' I believe given the number of coaches involved in allegations, it will be pretty stiff. I think Freeze will get at least a one year suspension for that alone. However, he is named in a Level 1 violation for improper recruiting (allegation 5, sections e, j, and o). The COI, under the new matrix, has already handed out show cause decisions to other coaches at other schools for less. I will be absolutely shocked if he isn't given a show cause.

As for the rest, according to the matrix the football program is getting nuked if it all holds up. I personally think they could go in the neighborhood of 60 scholarships and still not max out the penalties. But honestly, who knows?
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
18,459
7,573
113
I haven't even attempted to read the new NCAA guidelines but I strongly suspect there is enough "fine print' that they have a bunch of latitude in the amount of punishment they hand out even though there is a lot of tough talk in their new policy. As usual be prepared to be disappointed if you're a State fan.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,028
113
The whole point of the new rules was to reduce the amount of latitude the COI has and to standardize the punishments for similar infractions. The only real latitude the COI has is to either follow their written rules or ignore them.
 

Shamoan

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2013
12,466
0
0
honestly, nobody knows what the NCAA wants to do. their history is all over the place from stepping in and going way overboard and out of their jurisdiction (penn state) to botching cases wildly (miami). therein lies fear and comfort if you are in their cross-hairs. if they go lightly, they will all but pull any teeth they have remaining and would have wasted a tremendous amount of time and resources. they appear to want freeze and om admins have stood by the man that the ncaa looks to be after. i think that will be a huge miscalculation when its all said and done. nobody knows to what extent because if the ncaa is anything, it is consistently inconsistent.
 

aTotal360

Heisman
Nov 12, 2009
22,663
16,672
113
No way the NCAA actually follows their "matrix". I think OM will get about 25% of the sanctions the matrix says. My spitball answer would be 24 over 4, 2 year bowl ban, 4 year probabtion, and the entire staff along with Bdork is gone.
 

DudyDog

Senior
Jun 18, 2008
1,802
567
113
honestly, nobody knows what the NCAA wants to do. their history is all over the place from stepping in and going way overboard and out of their jurisdiction (penn state) to botching cases wildly (miami). therein lies fear and comfort if you are in their cross-hairs. if they go lightly, they will all but pull any teeth they have remaining and would have wasted a tremendous amount of time and resources. they appear to want freeze and om admins have stood by the man that the ncaa looks to be after. i think that will be a huge miscalculation when its all said and done. nobody knows to what extent because if the ncaa is anything, it is consistently inconsistent.

Comparing the NCAA of today to the NCAA of the past is like comparing Miss. State under Mullen to Miss. State under Crooms. Totally different even though the names of the organizations are the same.
 

DudyDog

Senior
Jun 18, 2008
1,802
567
113
No way the NCAA actually follows their "matrix". I think OM will get about 25% of the sanctions the matrix says. My spitball answer would be 24 over 4, 2 year bowl ban, 4 year probabtion, and the entire staff along with Bdork is gone.

If they get a 2 yr. bowl ban, 4 yrs probation and the entire staff along with Bjork are gone, they will definitely get more than 24 over 4. Plus, you can't say entire staff because half of them are new and weren't here under the allegations.
 
Nov 12, 2007
26,200
10,358
113
No way the NCAA actually follows their "matrix". I think OM will get about 25% of the sanctions the matrix says. My spitball answer would be 24 over 4, 2 year bowl ban, 4 year probabtion, and the entire staff along with Bdork is gone.

Maybe, but I'm not so sure. There has been much talk about this case through the coaching ranks. If they go light, coaches have said it is a green light to everyone else to ramp up the cheating. The blatant way Ole Miss cheated lends itself to harsher penalties in the eyes of coaches and their staffs.
 

Shamoan

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2013
12,466
0
0
based on what evidence? all we can judge is based on what they have done in the past. they have proven time and again to be wildly inconsistent and until they prove that they can follow their own directives, its time to assume they will do what they have done in the past. fwiw, i think om is going to get hammered, but nobody knows anything and nothing near the severity of the om situation has come up with the new matrix.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,028
113
Exactly. This is a precedent setting case and everyone in college football knows it and is watching to see what the NCAA will do.
 

dawgface

Redshirt
Nov 9, 2010
223
0
0
i don't think the NCAA ever in their wildest dreams envisioned the level of institutionalized corruption they have seen in the past 5 years....i'm surprised they haven't gotten the FBI involved investigating for RICO-teering (hint: this would be what i think the "network" is all about), but then maybe they have and we just haven't heard....oh well, it's make for an interesting chapter in "Flim-Flam".....😆
 

DerHntr

All-Conference
Sep 18, 2007
16,209
3,714
113
Speaking of their sanctions, I had an interesting conversation with an OM fan last week. The topic was: will OM fire Freeze if he only gets a 1 year show cause? The OM fan thought they would not fire him.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,028
113
I don't think they'll fire him for 1 year. Anything more than that and they'll have no choice though.
 

Dolphus Raymond

Redshirt
Aug 31, 2016
75
0
0
My prediction is 32 over 4-5 years and a two year bowl ban. My rationale is that the NCAA will sanction Ole Miss just a bit harsher than they did USC because they have to show some muscle. However, following the second NOA, had Ole Miss cleaned house, they would have gotten around 20 over 4 and maybe a 2 year bowl ban. Just my opinion. Why Ole Miss is clinging to Freeze is beyond me. My best guess is if they had it to do over again, Freeze and the rest would have been shown the door along with BF. Now, they are between the proverbial rock and hard place.
 
Last edited:

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,028
113
My prediction is 40 scholarships over 4 years, 2 year bowl ban, and a show cause for Freeze.
 

JungRebel

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2012
2,606
0
0
Is a television ban possible with the TV contracts that are in place? Is Ole Miss counted as a repeat offender?
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,028
113
I doubt there would be a TV ban, although I guess it's possible. You're only a repeat offender for any violations that occurred after your women's basketball and track programs went on probation last fall, so no, not a repeat offender.
 

AlCoDog

All-Conference
Feb 27, 2008
5,875
1,472
113
The thing about a tv ban is it punishes whoever OM is playing. I don't see that happening.
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,718
343
83
It matters to the store owner and to Ole Miss fans but it probably isn't going

to have any impact on the penalties, may possibly make them worse. Just my opinion.
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,718
343
83
It may eventually go to court but unless it is given special treatment it won't

be anytime soon which sort of makes it moot to me. If it is given special treatment and fast tracked then a whole lot of people are going to be answering a whole lot of questions.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,028
113
Got curious and Googled to get info about a TV ban. Last time the NCAA banned a team from TV was Ole Miss in 1995.
 

johnson86-1

All-American
Aug 22, 2012
15,271
5,806
113
Is a television ban possible with the TV contracts that are in place? Is Ole Miss counted as a repeat offender?

I don't think Ole Miss has to worry about a TV ban. The NCAA has to keep Power 5 conferences happy. They are not going to want anything to screw with their cash cow.
 

CochiseCowbell

Heisman
Oct 29, 2012
15,912
15,064
113
Jung, you seem like an intelligent & rational guy. Why aren't you asking your brethren these things? Or did I just answer my own question above?
 

mount lefroy

Redshirt
Feb 10, 2013
2,501
0
36
Putting aside how the OM administration handled the investigation, and putting aside the lack of institutional control charge, for anyone who can make the comparison: how much have schools been punished that cheated similarly to how Ole Miss did? How were the coaches who got 'failure to monitor' treated? And if the LOIC sticks, what is the least a program has ever gotten for it?

There isn't a similar case. Boeheim got 9 games for failure to monitor. Which is a 3rd of a season. But he wasn't mentioned in their violations similar to Freeze. Neither was Pitino. I'd say your penalties in the early 90's is the most relevant case. That was LOIC. But at the time it was bad. So bad it was described as the worst since Smu. Which was only a few years before.

I'd say this is going to be considerably worse. And this time the media is going to ask the question"what is it going to take to prevent om from doing this again?"
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Basketball Bulldogs prepare to level up competition, starting with Xavier in neutral site meeting
  2. 02 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Who carries the load?
  3. 03 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Run vs. Run
  4. 04 Maroon and White Basketball Mississippi State 79-57 Troy: Bulldogs build big early lead in home win over Trojans
  5. 05 Maroon and White Football Kamario Taylor speaks on return to Mississippi State for 2027