And that is the EXACT reason we continue to see so much of Briscoe and Gabriel. Cal's gotta move them (and BAM, Fox and Monk) along at all costs to make room for the incoming recruits. It's also the same reason Cal spent so much post game time commenting on why the NBA scouting analysts were wrong about Bam not being ready for the NBA.Hell yea! And we've got a killer class coming in.
Bingo. This is a fact and Cal protecting his blue chips came out in full force tonight. Justifiable or not, it cannot be denied at this point. Unless you are a SKJ type and totally check out entirely, he will protect you until the end, period.
Rather than delete this game, I am going to go back and watch every one of his 9 mins and see what pisses Cal off so much. He was 3-6 from 3 last game, and 1-1 tonight, but the guy can't get PT to save his life.
Mulder will get drafted or make a NBA roster before Briscoe. Nothing against Briscoe I just cannot think what he brings to a NBA roster.
My argument is our offense sucks balls because we have 2 guards who can do absolutely nothing but try to shoot a layup. That's pretty easy to defend. Why do you think the offense flows better without Bridcoe? Because usually the person who has replaced him from the bench can at least shoot a little bit and keep his defender honest. It opens up the lane and our team does so much better at that point.Based on what , threes ? You want to take away Briscoes time when Mulder only does one thing better . Your argument is based on nothing factual but just your preference . If Mulder is centric to our tournament run then we are in trouble
I think any advantage when Mulder plays is negated by the loss of what Briscoe does . He sets up a lot of our three point shooters and in fact he is the best at driving then kicking it out . Only Monk can create his own three point shot , the others need IB to get them an open shot . IB rebounds really good for his size on a team that needs rebounding badly . He's a better defender than Mulder no matter what you see on this board , an NBA scout sited Briscoes defense when evaluating UK players awhile back but what does he know .My argument is our offense sucks balls because we have 2 guards who can do absolutely nothing but try to shoot a layup. That's pretty easy to defend. Why do you think the offense flows better without Bridcoe? Because usually the person who has replaced him from the bench can at least shoot a little bit and keep his defender honest. It opens up the lane and our team does so much better at that point.
I'd like to see a link to that scout's thoughts. If he really cited Briscoe's defense, I'm betting it wasn't said recently at all. As for the rest of your post lmao.I think any advantage when Mulder plays is negated by the loss of what Briscoe does . He sets up a lot of our three point shooters and in fact he is the best at driving then kicking it out . Only Monk can create his own three point shot , the others need IB to get them an open shot . IB rebounds really good for his size on a team that needs rebounding badly . He's a better defender than Mulder no matter what you see on this board , an NBA scout sited Briscoes defense when evaluating UK players awhile back but what does he know .
There's more to it than just being able to shoot , I like Mulder and hope he is on fire when he enters the game but he is a situational player to me . If Mulder is hitting then he should play more and if not then the occasional breather substitute is fine , just like Cal has been doing . Mulder could go 5-6 from three against UF and that would be great but it doesn't mean you play him in lieu of Briscoe due to that one game .
It was on the ksr website , go find it yourself . I consider you to be an outright dumbass on everything so I'm not surprised you let out a simpleton giggle . To go along with your campaign to fire Stoops and all the other horrible takes you've never once posted a single thing that I thought was funny , clever or intriguing .I'd like to see a link to that scout's thoughts. If he really cited Briscoe's defense, I'm betting it wasn't said recently at all. As for the rest of your post lmao.
As I said earlier, SKJ checked out the moment he showed up and didn't put the work in. He's probably going to transfer and it's not a good example.
Briscoe wants to be a pro far more than he wants to be at UK. Cal is well aware of that. He's not going to risk taking his chance away by placing him where he belongs (6th man) and splitting some of his minutes.
If some agree with it, fine. Cal's results do speak for themselves, and recruiting is his schtick. He might feel it could be used against him. I don't know.
But there's no excuse in Mulder not getting more time considering we need the spacing and he's got a good per on this team.
X, my point in this argument is that I know our team looks better with him on the bench. I don't care what his stats are, don't care what NBA scouts say. I'm not basing this on individual performances, but instead the team performance. The TEAM has played better while he has been out of the game, I really don't know how you can argue that. This isn't Mulder vs Briscoe or Willis vs Briscoe for me. I don't care if we have Johnny David in the game, if our team is somehow playing better with that lineup, don't you think we should stick to it? The last 2 games, Briscoe has gotten into foul trouble with the game close deep into the second half and we have went on huge runs to win the game. The man who replaced him might have not done jack **** as far as the score book says, but obviously what ever he (whoever came in for Briscoe) did while he was in made us look like a completely different team and we put our opponents away.It was on the ksr website , go find it yourself . I consider you to be an outright dumbass on everything so I'm not surprised you let out a simpleton giggle . To go along with your campaign to fire Stoops and all the other horrible takes you've never once posted a single thing that I thought was funny , clever or intriguing .
In fact all of your posts have been a complaint or childish comment , every single post . For that reason I'm going to ignore the clown car you ride in , you bring absolutely zero to this board outside of childish whining . Now go ahead and get your tirade in because your personality won't let you be one upped . In the meantime I'll never see it .
Using two instances during a whole season is not a pattern , I'm sure I could have found instances where Mulders time was a negative if I was on the hunt for such things . Thirty games and two whole times is not enough to sway my opinion .X, my point in this argument is that I know our team looks better with him on the bench. I don't care what his stats are, don't care what NBA scouts say. I'm not basing this on individual performances, but instead the team performance. The TEAM has played better while he has been out of the game, I really don't know how you can argue that. This isn't Mulder vs Briscoe or Willis vs Briscoe for me. I don't care if we have Johnny David in the game, if our team is somehow playing better with that lineup, don't you think we should stick to it? The last 2 games, Briscoe has gotten into foul trouble with the game close deep into the second half and we have went on huge runs to win the game. The man who replaced him might have not done jack **** as far as the score book says, but obviously what ever he (whoever came in for Briscoe) did while he was in made us look like a completely different team and we put our opponents away.
Wow, what a freaking clueless retard. I've never even posted in the football forum or brought up Stoops anywhere on this site so it's clear you have me mistaken for someone else and it's clear that you can't bring anything intellectual to the table so you resort to childish name calling. Just an all around terrible, clueless poster and miserable and likely very lonely person.It was on the ksr website , go find it yourself . I consider you to be an outright dumbass on everything so I'm not surprised you let out a simpleton giggle . To go along with your campaign to fire Stoops and all the other horrible takes you've never once posted a single thing that I thought was funny , clever or intriguing .
In fact all of your posts have been a complaint or childish comment , every single post . For that reason I'm going to ignore the clown car you ride in , you bring absolutely zero to this board outside of childish whining . Now go ahead and get your tirade in because your personality won't let you be one upped . In the meantime I'll never see it .
There you got throwing rumors around like the are facts......."SKJ is probably going to transfer." I read everything I can find on the CATS. Other than a few idiots like you throwing the rumor around I have seen nothing to substantiate your claim......You also claim he didn't put in the work. That infers that he is lazy. You are always doing this. You must have a sad existence if you have to make up fake stories. Does it make you feel important to start and then spread this stupid stuff?
He can not defend a fence post.Rather than delete this game, I am going to go back and watch every one of his 9 mins and see what pisses Cal off so much. He was 3-6 from 3 last game, and 1-1 tonight, but the guy can't get PT to save his life.
He can not defend a fence post.
Mulder is 3rd on the team in Pts per 40 mins.
Ahead of Fox, Monk and Hawkins in Rebs per 40 mins and Blocks per 40 mins.
Has a better Turnover margin per 40 mins than Fox and Monk.
Lastly, his PER (Player Efficiency Rating) is 4th on the team, behind Fox, Monk and Bam.
Oh, was that Willis who got beat flat footed off the dribble and got dunked on by that stiff from Mizzou? No, that was Gabriel. Crickets from Cal after the play...Have you watched a single game this year? I've watched Monk, Fox and Gabriel chase their men down the lane all year. Willis gives away the baseline and lane like candy on Halloween. They've collectively hung Bam out to dry trying to defend the rim and guard his man more than Saturday's laundry. We have had MANY games where the only guy playing defense was Briscoe.
As I said, I can only conclude you simply do not understand defense.
Oh, was that Willis who got beat flat footed off the dribble and got dunked on by that stiff from Mizzou? No, that was Gabriel. Crickets from Cal after the play...
No, you apparently have comprehension issues on what YOU wrote. I quote " Willis gives away the baseline like candy on Halloween." Was your account hacked and someone else inserted that text?Bullitt Co mafia? Or reading issues? Reason I ask, is that I didn't single Willis out at all. You are either overly sensitive about Willis or didn't understand that the post was about Briscoe's defense.
No, you apparently have comprehension issues on what YOU wrote. I quote " Willis gives away the baseline like candy on Halloween." Was your account hacked and someone else inserted that text?
That may be why Briscoe is out there.Mulder will get drafted or make a NBA roster before Briscoe. Nothing against Briscoe I just cannot think what he brings to a NBA roster.
Mulder cost us the title. Damn him, I knew I didn't like himCost us the title is 2015. Ulis wins vs. Wisconsin.
You cant base things on per 40 minutes I played about 2 minutes a game in high school shot 10 times scored 2 points. My 40 minutes per I was averaging 40 pts a gameMulder is 3rd on the team in Pts per 40 mins.
Ahead of Fox, Monk and Hawkins in Rebs per 40 mins and Blocks per 40 mins.
Has a better Turnover margin per 40 mins than Fox and Monk.
Lastly, his PER (Player Efficiency Rating) is 4th on the team, behind Fox, Monk and Bam.
He's not worse than Willis, Monk or Fox in that regard. In his 9 mins last night, he got scored on twice (both jumpers). The only guard who is even decent at guarding drives to the lane is Hawkins and he is average at best at it.