Chris Beard is 104-47 with a 68% win percentage in his four and a half years at tech. Gillispie was 70-26 with a 72% win percentage at A&M in 3 years. Beard lost 13 games last year and was in a 4 game losing streak before the year was cancelled. 13 freaking losses, with more coming.
You have his 5 year run as “better” than Cal’s because he did get to a title game, but he also didn’t win, and you’ve made it very clear that’s what matters. And I do agree with that. Fact is Cal wins more though. More tournament wins than any other coach since he’s been at UK. Made an elite 8 his last eligible year and had a top 10 team last year.
Beard had a Shaka Smart run and is a good young coach, but to replace Cal with him at this point is nonsensical at best. The bizarre/irrational claims are clearly coming from you, but I understand it, and I still like you as a poster. You’re a smart guy, but letting your emotions and disdain for Cal’s one and done system cloud your judgement. I’m not a fan of Cal. His style is not fun anymore. If you want him gone because of his style and arrogance or whatever, I get it. I really do. But ignoring his results and axing him now and throwing Beard in would be so, so reckless.
First, quit with the patronizing ********. I don’t need you to tell me how to behave, I understand this sport far more than you that’s obvious.
You’re moving goalpost around because you’re making no sense and you’re trying to find ground to win. It’s not going to happen.
Beard took over a doormat program and immediately turned them into a juggernaut. What he did at Texas tech in that short of time is something we’ve rarely seen in the history of college basketball. You comparing him to Gillispie makes me wonder if you’re able to think about this clearly at all. Saying it would be reckless to hire Beard is just an asinine statement. You do realize Beard has TT sitting at number 15 while you’re making a thread and pumping your chest over a 4-6 calipari team who started the year the worst EVER in the history of UK right? Please stop throwing comebacks and let these things sink in.
Also I’m not a title or bust guy, but Calipari is definitely going to be judged by his inability to win a second title.
Cal does NOT win more than Beard. Not since Beard has been at TT when you consider what he has to work with. What you’re trying to do is ignore the totality of the situation and argue as if Beard has been at Kansas or UNC. Their jobs are not equal. Beard has been far more impressive at TT than Cal had been at UK.
Your post comparing him to Gillispie is outright nonsense. I can’t debate you if this is all you have my guy.
Forget it, some of you are simply making yourselves look foolish by going down this road. Just say you understand that Beard might be a great up and comer but you want to stick with Cal for now. It’s far better than trying to twist reality and making yourself sound like you don’t understand how any of this works with these insane comparisons.