Micah Clark

The_Senator

Sophomore
Aug 1, 2001
1,305
121
51
I heard that there was an article in the SL this morning(I don't read it) that Micah Clark would be willing to be a DT if needed. Don't know how I feel about that but would moving Seymour back to defense be an option.
Although it was his first year at OT there were a lot of growing pains. Technique needs a lot of work..
 

knightfan7

Heisman
Jul 30, 2003
95,413
69,230
113
From what I've heard he's a very good DT too.

I think it was more of a "I'll play anywhere they need me" kind of answer but DT has been brought up here before.
 

RUwoz

All-Conference
Jul 20, 2014
3,266
1,982
0
It would be so dumb to move him to D, he can be a star OLineman if he develops
 

Pils86

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2008
1,783
1,332
113
He looks to light to help on OL right now, needs some beef. Could probably get on the field earlier on D.
 

RUwoz

All-Conference
Jul 20, 2014
3,266
1,982
0
There are those who think he'd be just as big a star on D with his freaky athletic ability.
DLine doesn't need the help as bad. Lewis is going to look just as bad as Laviano if he's constantly running for his life
 
  • Like
Reactions: ron313

knightfan7

Heisman
Jul 30, 2003
95,413
69,230
113
DLine doesn't need the help as bad. Lewis is going to look just as bad as Laviano if he's constantly running for his life

See, I believe RU's OT's will be better at their position in the coming season than the DT's.

We'll just have to agree to disagree. It's up to Ash and the coaches anyway.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,349
38,102
113
I would rather have a star OT but then again, if he has the burst needed to be a star DT, that wouldn't be so bad either. It would depend on how our young OT's progress this spring. I saw some growing pains with Seymour but also saw a lot of potential. He never should have been a starter with only a couple of months playing OT.
As for how bad the OL looked last year, keep in mind a few things. All of the experience was on the inside. Both OT's were young/inexperienced and not all that good. (disclaimer- young/inexperienced= not that good, not lack of talent) This caused the inside guys to have to cheat a little to try to help these guys out. The OC had no clue in regard to OL. He was a WR coach. Our OL coach was very young and never had been tasked to turn a pro-set OL into a power spread OL at this level. He couldn't turn to his OC for help because the OC was a WR coach. And the OC play design made the work of the OL very difficult and complicated. So many things. Kill will know how to help Blasik and we will see a huge improvement.
Sorry for the long post but it drives me crazy when the simple answer is not all that simple. And this happens often at OL. Easy to blame them because almost no one knows how to really grade them by sitting in the seats.
 

seels2662

Heisman
Aug 16, 2005
24,393
16,915
113
We got two, thats right two, DT in the last two classes. Clark will probably end up being an NFL offensive lineman. But we may never know because we have to play someone on the defensive line.
 

AshCatchEm

Heisman
Jan 8, 2016
13,884
19,925
113
We got two, thats right two, DT in the last two classes. Clark will probably end up being an NFL offensive lineman. But we may never know because we have to play someone on the defensive line.
Not if you include bordner who can easily make the transition to DT with his current weight and frame
 

RUonBrain

All-American
Apr 29, 2002
8,095
7,531
113
We got two, thats right two, DT in the last two classes. Clark will probably end up being an NFL offensive lineman. But we may never know because we have to play someone on the defensive line.

Get the Miami transfer!!
 

seels2662

Heisman
Aug 16, 2005
24,393
16,915
113
Not if you include bordner who can easily make the transition to DT with his current weight and frame
The question then is which player who we take out of position to fill the need.

To be honest I think its time to bring back Seymour to the DL.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,582
86,603
113
The OC had no clue in regard to OL. He was a WR coach. Our OL coach was very young and never had been tasked to turn a pro-set OL into a power spread OL at this level. He couldn't turn to his OC for help because the OC was a WR coach. And the OC play design made the work of the OL very difficult and complicated.So many things. Kill will know how to help Blasik and we will see a huge improvement.

I hope you are correct.
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,833
25,517
113
There are those who think he'd be just as big a star on D with his freaky athletic ability.
----
it is a tough choice when a player could excel on either offense or defense.... I would rather
have the offense opening holes, protecting the qb better......stay in a game by actually
putting points on the board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seels2662

AshCatchEm

Heisman
Jan 8, 2016
13,884
19,925
113
The question then is which player who we take out of position to fill the need.

To be honest I think its time to bring back Seymour to the DL.
If Seymour was moved it means he probably can't play DL. Ash has seen a lot of effective dt's so i think he would still be on DL if his future was there. Might as well put him where it's easier.

As far as bordner, I don't think DT is out of position..He has the perfect frame for it and could easily hit 290-300. Would be a disruptive force there.
 

seels2662

Heisman
Aug 16, 2005
24,393
16,915
113
If Seymour was moved it means he probably can't play DL. Ash has seen a lot of effective dt's so i think he would still be on DL if his future was there. Might as well put him where it's easier.

As far as bordner, I don't think DT is out of position..He has the perfect frame for it and could easily hit 290-300. Would be a disruptive force there.
My guess is he was moved because we were having serious issues at RT and we needed someone, anyone to stop somebody there. I mean wasn't Denman one of your favorite players? :)
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
I would rather have a star OT but then again, if he has the burst needed to be a star DT, that wouldn't be so bad either. It would depend on how our young OT's progress this spring. I saw some growing pains with Seymour but also saw a lot of potential. He never should have been a starter with only a couple of months playing OT.
As for how bad the OL looked last year, keep in mind a few things. All of the experience was on the inside. Both OT's were young/inexperienced and not all that good. (disclaimer- young/inexperienced= not that good, not lack of talent) This caused the inside guys to have to cheat a little to try to help these guys out. The OC had no clue in regard to OL. He was a WR coach. Our OL coach was very young and never had been tasked to turn a pro-set OL into a power spread OL at this level. He couldn't turn to his OC for help because the OC was a WR coach. And the OC play design made the work of the OL very difficult and complicated. So many things. Kill will know how to help Blasik and we will see a huge improvement.
Sorry for the long post but it drives me crazy when the simple answer is not all that simple. And this happens often at OL. Easy to blame them because almost no one knows how to really grade them by sitting in the seats.
I like where we'll be at offensive tackle. We could be very good there sooner rather than later. The inside though has to step up.
 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,563
12,265
113
We got two, thats right two, DT in the last two classes. Clark will probably end up being an NFL offensive lineman. But we may never know because we have to play someone on the defensive line.

Besides Bordner shifting over to DT we also have Tedrov. Remember his brother came in as a DE and became a fairly decent DT for RU for several years.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,349
38,102
113
Besides Bordner shifting over to DT we also have Tedrov. Remember his brother came in as a DE and became a fairly decent DT for RU for several years.

I don't know if Mike has the frame to add 50+ lbs. Pete was very good for us but was the definition of a typical GS DT- way undersized
 

sct1111

All-American
Nov 30, 2014
6,113
8,402
113
Has anyone seen Bordner in the workout videos on Snapchat? He has a long way to go in terms of building muscle and size.

Our best OL was easily Tariq Cole last year. Seymour definitely had some growing pains. But it was mostly our inside guys who got blown up terribly by opposing DLs. Who plays guard and center this year besides Miller? And if they're worse than our inside guys last year then we're screwed.
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
I prefer we keep Tverdov at DE for the first couple of years at least... he should be able to handle 265-270 lbs. and maintain his quickness...brother was another underrated guy who used great technique to play inside...it's up to coach Parker now.
 

Barnaby&Neill

All-American
Dec 10, 2010
6,946
7,534
81
When our D-line was lacking depth in 05, Cam Stephenson filled in as starting DT before becoming starting OG the next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knightfan7

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,349
38,102
113
Has anyone seen Bordner in the workout videos on Snapchat? He has a long way to go in terms of building muscle and size.

Our best OL was easily Tariq Cole last year. Seymour definitely had some growing pains. But it was mostly our inside guys who got blown up terribly by opposing DLs. Who plays guard and center this year besides Miller? And if they're worse than our inside guys last year then we're screwed.

Cole was decent for his first year and I expect him to get better but far far far from our best OL last year.
 

nukem

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2003
2,152
4,731
113
Not if you include bordner who can easily make the transition to DT with his current weight and frame

Besides Bordner shifting over to DT we also have Tedrov. Remember his brother came in as a DE and became a fairly decent DT for RU for several years.

You guys wanting DE's to transition to DT's haven't learned anything about playing in the B1G yet. Could this possibly happen, sure. Will it successfully happen in a year or 2, no. And besides that, then who is going to play DE? We have almost completely struck out recruiting true DT's the last 2 years and this will have to be creatively addressed in the next couple of classes.

Here is a picture of Bordner.


And here is a picture of Cam Goode, a kid we're recruiting for 18:


Notice a difference. This is what I would like out DT reruits to look like. And his hudl.

 

Pils86

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2008
1,783
1,332
113
We need more help on OL. Cole, Miller, Applefield and Heeman are the only OL I feel are ready right now. Venesky is squat like Miller but maybe he can step in at center, Krimin has good potential but will only be second year, Seymour was not ready last year and hopefully learns quickly, Jackson and Taylor who knows. Clark is too light for 17 but may be forced into action. Wished we had gotten a JUCO or 5th year transfer or two.
 

AshCatchEm

Heisman
Jan 8, 2016
13,884
19,925
113
You guys wanting DE's to transition to DT's haven't learned anything about playing in the B1G yet. Could this possibly happen, sure. Will it successfully happen in a year or 2, no. And besides that, then who is going to play DE? We have almost completely struck out recruiting true DT's the last 2 years and this will have to be creatively addressed in the next couple of classes.

Here is a picture of Bordner.


And here is a picture of Cam Goode, a kid we're recruiting for 18:


Notice a difference. This is what I would like out DT reruits to look like. And his hudl.


Dude bordner is huge with a gigantic frame to fill out. He would have 0 trouble hitting 290-300. He would easily turn into one of the best DT's we've had in years. If JPO was effective against big ten competition then bordner certainly would be..And he'd probably have the chance to be bigger too
 

nukem

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2003
2,152
4,731
113
Dude bordner is huge with a gigantic frame to fill out. He would have 0 trouble hitting 290-300. He would easily turn into one of the best DT's we've had in years. If JPO was effective against big ten competition then bordner certainly would be..And he'd probably have the chance to be bigger too

That wouldn't surprise me if he moves inside to DT. But we are robbing Peter to pay Paul. We need DE's and DT's. We haven't adequately addressed the DT position the last 2 years. You can't possibly deny that.
 

RU2055

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2009
3,582
1,693
0
DT and maybe also DE. Micah Clark's initial burst from the three point is as explosive as you will ever see from a college football player.

They also like what they have at OTs right now.
 
Last edited:

RU2055

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2009
3,582
1,693
0
Has anyone seen Bordner in the workout videos on Snapchat? He has a long way to go in terms of building muscle and size.

Our best OL was easily Tariq Cole last year. Seymour definitely had some growing pains. But it was mostly our inside guys who got blown up terribly by opposing DLs. Who plays guard and center this year besides Miller? And if they're worse than our inside guys last year then we're screwed.

The OL will be better this year.