Every dentist in America got an erection with this announcement. They are going to be raking in serious cash extracting teeth in the next few years.
Make America Healthy Again
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
Every dentist in America got an erection with this announcement. They are going to be raking in serious cash extracting teeth in the next few years.
It’s time to DRINK WHOLE MILK, America.
Such an honor to be in the Oval Office as @POTUS signed the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act into law — surrounded by the farmers who make it all possible.
This historic bill officially brings whole milk back into our schools and back where it belongs.
Paired with the new 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines, this marks a major step forward for real food, rural America, and the families we serve.
A huge win for children, consumers, and the dairy farmers who feed our nation!!!
#DrinkWholeMilk
Did you see the weird "whole milk" campaign they just did? They made this MASSIVE deal about "drinking whole milk again!" because they approved it being served to kids in school again. It was SUPER weird, there were lots of pics of rjkj and trump drinking milk lol.
I did see someone speculate online that originally that the campaign was all supposed to be about raw milk, but then their lawyers got involved and told them that would be a TERRIBLE idea, so they pivoted to Whole Milk. Which has always been available (obviously) lol, though not in schools since 2010.
Others think it was just a racist dog whistle, but that's a lil too conspiratorial for me.
Let them eat poison!
Trump just declared, "glyphosate-based herbicides are a cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy." And he's declaring glyphosate weedkiller to be a federally-protected critical resources.
This is insanity. He is now pushing the mass poisoning of American food crops and groceries with cancer-causing deadly weedkiller chemicals that will be sprayed all over the food crops.
Trump just declared chemical warfare on the American people. It's all here in black and white:
Trump just declared, "glyphosate-based herbicides are a cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy." And he's declaring glyphosate weedkiller to be a federally-protected critical resources.
This is insanity. He is now pushing the mass poisoning of American food crops and groceries with cancer-causing deadly weedkiller chemicals that will be sprayed all over the food crops.
Trump just declared chemical warfare on the American people. It's all here in black and white:
Last edited:
I'm not thrilled about it if true but let's not pretend it's new. Every human and animal in this nation is probably walking around with unsafe levels of glyphosate in our body. It's been in use for decades.
I disagree with Trump on this one. Am I leaving MAGA because of this??? No!!!
BREAKING - Donald Trump bypasses Congress by attempting to provide immunity to cancer-causing glyphosate manufacturers!!!
Glyphosate causes cancer according to several court rulings. In a gift to the big pharma/big ag industry, Trump has just tried to unilaterally block state laws and court rulings that allow liability for cancer from glyphosate manufacturers.
Glyphosate is found in Roundup, which is produced by a subsidiary of Bayer Pharma. MAHA has been fighting with Congress for months to prevent them from inserting chemical immunity into various bills. When the GOP failed to deliver, Trump stepped in and did it for them.
BREAKING - Donald Trump bypasses Congress by attempting to provide immunity to cancer-causing glyphosate manufacturers!!!Glyphosate causes cancer according to several court rulings. In a gift to the big pharma/big ag industry, Trump has just tried to unilaterally block state laws and court rulings that allow liability for cancer from glyphosate manufacturers.
Glyphosate is found in Roundup, which is produced by a subsidiary of Bayer Pharma. MAHA has been fighting with Congress for months to prevent them from inserting chemical immunity into various bills. When the GOP failed to deliver, Trump stepped in and did it for them.
I disagree with Trump on this one. Am I leaving MAGA because of this??? No!!!
Glyphosate causes cancer according to several court rulings. In a gift to the big pharma/big ag industry, Trump has just tried to unilaterally block state laws and court rulings that allow liability for cancer from glyphosate manufacturers.
Glyphosate is found in Roundup, which is produced by a subsidiary of Bayer Pharma. MAHA has been fighting with Congress for months to prevent them from inserting chemical immunity into various bills. When the GOP failed to deliver, Trump stepped in and did it for them.
Yet another reason you should be ashamed of the incompetent nutbags your president picked for his cabinet. This one is not making us healthier.
Terrible terrible decision by Trump. We should be aggressively banning the substances poisoning our food supply.
The sad truth.
It is an absolute lie that glyphosate is needed for 80% of U.S. food production.
Glyphosate is sprayed on wheat crops as a DESSICANT - a drying agent. Not to kill weeds.
So they poison the entire wheat supply just to speed the drying time which gets farmers paid 3-4 days earlier than allowing wheat to dry in the sun (which is how it's been done for centuries).
If all the glyphosate disappeared tomorrow, we would still be growing wheat, corn, soy and other crops. We just wouldn't be eating cancer-causing poison weedkiller chemicals
It is an absolute lie that glyphosate is needed for 80% of U.S. food production.
Glyphosate is sprayed on wheat crops as a DESSICANT - a drying agent. Not to kill weeds.
So they poison the entire wheat supply just to speed the drying time which gets farmers paid 3-4 days earlier than allowing wheat to dry in the sun (which is how it's been done for centuries).
If all the glyphosate disappeared tomorrow, we would still be growing wheat, corn, soy and other crops. We just wouldn't be eating cancer-causing poison weedkiller chemicals
Another opinion on what's occurring.
Everyone seems to be losing their mind over Trump’s phosphorus and glyphosate executive order, so let’s look at this logically…
President Trump has invoked the Defense Production Act to secure domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.
At first glance, that feels like a betrayal of everything MAHA stands for. RFK Jr. has spoken clearly about its health risks and we all dream of chemical-free agriculture, but this was not a health endorsement, it was a national security decision.
Elemental phosphorus is not just used in agriculture, it is essential for defense manufacturing, munitions, industrial processes and fertilizers. The United States imports millions of kilograms every year. If that supply is disrupted by hostile nations, trade wars or global instability, both military readiness and food production are hit at the same time.
Food security is national security.
Right now, whether we like it or not, American agriculture is built on chemical infrastructure. Glyphosate is embedded in that system. If it vanished overnight, crop yields would fall sharply, livestock feed chains would destabilize and food prices would spike dramatically.
If the US relies on foreign adversaries for critical materials like phosphorus, there is no leverage, no sovereignty and no safe path to transition. Securing domestic production does not mean endorsing long-term chemical dependency, it means ensuring stability while alternatives are developed and scaled responsibly.
You cannot dismantle a 40-year agricultural infrastructure in one executive order without causing shockwaves. That does not mean the current system is healthy, it means you do not detonate it before you have built the alternative.
Invoking the Defense Production Act allows the government to prioritize domestic production and reduce vulnerability to external pressure in an increasingly unstable world.
This may not feel ideal, but if we want regenerative agriculture, soil restoration and a reduction in chemical dependency, those shifts must be phased in strategically. They cannot be forced through sudden scarcity.
There is a difference between entrenching a system and securing it long enough to reform it.
I think we must trust the sequence; stability, sovereignty and then transformation.
Everyone seems to be losing their mind over Trump’s phosphorus and glyphosate executive order, so let’s look at this logically…
President Trump has invoked the Defense Production Act to secure domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.
At first glance, that feels like a betrayal of everything MAHA stands for. RFK Jr. has spoken clearly about its health risks and we all dream of chemical-free agriculture, but this was not a health endorsement, it was a national security decision.
Elemental phosphorus is not just used in agriculture, it is essential for defense manufacturing, munitions, industrial processes and fertilizers. The United States imports millions of kilograms every year. If that supply is disrupted by hostile nations, trade wars or global instability, both military readiness and food production are hit at the same time.
Food security is national security.
Right now, whether we like it or not, American agriculture is built on chemical infrastructure. Glyphosate is embedded in that system. If it vanished overnight, crop yields would fall sharply, livestock feed chains would destabilize and food prices would spike dramatically.
If the US relies on foreign adversaries for critical materials like phosphorus, there is no leverage, no sovereignty and no safe path to transition. Securing domestic production does not mean endorsing long-term chemical dependency, it means ensuring stability while alternatives are developed and scaled responsibly.
You cannot dismantle a 40-year agricultural infrastructure in one executive order without causing shockwaves. That does not mean the current system is healthy, it means you do not detonate it before you have built the alternative.
Invoking the Defense Production Act allows the government to prioritize domestic production and reduce vulnerability to external pressure in an increasingly unstable world.
This may not feel ideal, but if we want regenerative agriculture, soil restoration and a reduction in chemical dependency, those shifts must be phased in strategically. They cannot be forced through sudden scarcity.
There is a difference between entrenching a system and securing it long enough to reform it.
I think we must trust the sequence; stability, sovereignty and then transformation.
Read the reply to this xpost and I guess the shoe fits for you too.
That’s not what they’re doing.
They are still transitioning away from artificial coloring.
The previous definition of “artificial color” did not distinguish between actual artificial colors and those colors derived from natural sources.
They’re still moving away from artificial colors.
You’re an idiot for posting this clickbait.
I'm glad to hear they're not actually backing out of their claim, though you can understand my skepticism given the news from earlier this week about Trump bending over for big pesticide wrt Glyphosate. We'll see what happens, but the administration's battle against big food and the poisons they're putting into everything is something I 100% support.
Wow, so disturbing.
"10 days after his speech about trust and openness, HHS rescinded a 54-year-old policy of soliciting public comments for new rules and regulations, silencing the voices of many of the stakeholders he pledged to serve. Kennedy has summarily dismissed advisers and experts, communicated policy changes on pay-walled media, fired a whistleblower, and overseen the revisions of guidelines and recommendations, contradicting decades of established science, often to the benefit of industries he formerly condemned. Under Kennedy's leadership, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) shuttered programmes studying the health effects of air pollution, HHS withheld a report linking alcohol consumption to cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) withdrew warnings of potential harm from consuming products (such as raw milk and chlorine dioxide) falsely marketed as treatments for autism. His changes at CDC have driven 26 states to reject official guidance on vaccine policy, and in December the CDC awarded an unsolicited $1·6 million grant to conduct a vaccine study in Guinea-Bissau that raised so many ethical concerns—the design would have risked exposing thousands of unvaccinated children to hepatitis B—that it has been compared to the infamous Untreated Syphilis Study at Tuskegee.
HHS under Kennedy has made a habit of throwing good money after bad science. Amid the Trump administration's cuts to research funding and personnel there has been a harmful shift in priorities. Cutting-edge discoveries and clinical investigations—on subjects ranging from mRNA vaccines to diabetes and dementia—are denied crucial resources while junk science and fringe beliefs are elevated without justifiable explanation. Under Kennedy's leadership, politicisation at the NIH, FDA, and CDC is imperilling the future of US science and innovation and throttling the public health enterprise that keeps the country safe today.
The mechanisms maintained by the Federal Government to monitor and report health concerns such as drug overdoses, maternal mortality, and food security have been as beleaguered as the doctors and scientists who rely on them; thousands of datasets are no longer publicly available, leaving Americans—and the world—unprepared to respond to future crises. And crises are looming: in November, 2025, the first human infection (and death) from the H5N5 strain of avian flu was recorded in Washington state; pertussis, which killed 13 people in the USA in 2025, continues to spread across the country; and the measles outbreak that began in January of last year now threatens the elimination status of the USA and Mexico.
Despite these developments, Kennedy has continued to spread misinformation and push politicised agendas at the expense of the country's most vulnerable. When called to account for his decisions by Congress, he has been evasive and combative. The destruction that Kennedy has wrought in 1 year might take generations to repair, and there is little hope for US health and science while he remains at the helm. Calls for his resignation now number in the thousands. Congress must exercise its duty of oversight and hold Kennedy accountable for his record, or else accept responsibility for endorsing President Trump's decision to let him “run wild on health”.
"10 days after his speech about trust and openness, HHS rescinded a 54-year-old policy of soliciting public comments for new rules and regulations, silencing the voices of many of the stakeholders he pledged to serve. Kennedy has summarily dismissed advisers and experts, communicated policy changes on pay-walled media, fired a whistleblower, and overseen the revisions of guidelines and recommendations, contradicting decades of established science, often to the benefit of industries he formerly condemned. Under Kennedy's leadership, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) shuttered programmes studying the health effects of air pollution, HHS withheld a report linking alcohol consumption to cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) withdrew warnings of potential harm from consuming products (such as raw milk and chlorine dioxide) falsely marketed as treatments for autism. His changes at CDC have driven 26 states to reject official guidance on vaccine policy, and in December the CDC awarded an unsolicited $1·6 million grant to conduct a vaccine study in Guinea-Bissau that raised so many ethical concerns—the design would have risked exposing thousands of unvaccinated children to hepatitis B—that it has been compared to the infamous Untreated Syphilis Study at Tuskegee.
HHS under Kennedy has made a habit of throwing good money after bad science. Amid the Trump administration's cuts to research funding and personnel there has been a harmful shift in priorities. Cutting-edge discoveries and clinical investigations—on subjects ranging from mRNA vaccines to diabetes and dementia—are denied crucial resources while junk science and fringe beliefs are elevated without justifiable explanation. Under Kennedy's leadership, politicisation at the NIH, FDA, and CDC is imperilling the future of US science and innovation and throttling the public health enterprise that keeps the country safe today.
The mechanisms maintained by the Federal Government to monitor and report health concerns such as drug overdoses, maternal mortality, and food security have been as beleaguered as the doctors and scientists who rely on them; thousands of datasets are no longer publicly available, leaving Americans—and the world—unprepared to respond to future crises. And crises are looming: in November, 2025, the first human infection (and death) from the H5N5 strain of avian flu was recorded in Washington state; pertussis, which killed 13 people in the USA in 2025, continues to spread across the country; and the measles outbreak that began in January of last year now threatens the elimination status of the USA and Mexico.
Despite these developments, Kennedy has continued to spread misinformation and push politicised agendas at the expense of the country's most vulnerable. When called to account for his decisions by Congress, he has been evasive and combative. The destruction that Kennedy has wrought in 1 year might take generations to repair, and there is little hope for US health and science while he remains at the helm. Calls for his resignation now number in the thousands. Congress must exercise its duty of oversight and hold Kennedy accountable for his record, or else accept responsibility for endorsing President Trump's decision to let him “run wild on health”.
Last edited:
dpic, this is another of those areas in which I have little understanding, so Bear with me. First of all we need a "discovery pipleline" for new medicines, I think we's all agree with that. And, I even believe that most of us would accept that government grants play a role.
But here's what went through my mind....why don't the pharma companies, Those that actually are going to profit from the discoveries pay the lion's share of the R&D. Or, if the discovery has real merit, get investments from one of the venture capital firms in return for a portion of future profit.
Why do my thoughts go this way? well for one thing, we have a $39 trillion debt....next we, or at least a lot of us, excoriate big pharma for it's high prices and large profits. So, to me, does it make sense for a large debtor to fund the profits of a commercial organization? Or are we just in one of those situations where we expect it because it's always been done this way?
I expect that my questions reflect a total lack of understanding about how the system works. So maybe if someone works in the industry or has a better understanding than I could provide some insight
Of course it is. Anything that is bad for Trump/Maga is good for America, and doubly so in this particular instance.
I was referring to a return to normalcy of the vaccine schedule, and as someone with babies, its incredibly important this conspiracy theory bs is being shut down in regards to vaccines. The rest of your disregard for nuance I have no time for.
I'm literally agreeing with you without qualification. I even loved your post. I'm not sure what the disconnect is, but I'm sorry that upsets you.
The lower courts have absolutely stood as the most effective bulwark against the maniacs in the WH.
You'll have to excuse tigress ... he means well, but he's got a tinge of little man syndrome that sometimes overtakes his better judgment.
No, I just think yall's lack of nuance is no different than MAGA (just the opposite) and its akin to evangelicalism (just the liberal flavor) which is incredibly distasteful, and based on low intelligence not to mention terrible reasoning.
In fighting among Liberals is how we got here, so I'll stop regardless of what yall respond next. It's not productive. But you far leftists that are dogmatic in your beliefs who wouldn't vote for Kamala because of Palestine are why we are here and Trump was elected again. Far leftists who refuse to see nuance are insufferable, so much so they wouldn't even vote (and Trump was able to rally his base against yalls dogma).what in God's holy name are you blathering about, man?
I'm just sick of it- it's no different than the bs Christian dogma just the leftist version.