Toggle sidebar

LSU passed on Arnett...

was21

was21

Senior
May 29, 2007
9,981
616
113
now will run gauntlet of Oregon and Texas? Orgeron possibly on the way out, Cristobal not going anywhere, and Sarkisian just arrived
 
P

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
59,440
30,089
113
LSU passed on Arnett or he passed in them? Don’t care, good news either way.
 
P

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
59,440
30,089
113
I'm not totally buying the huge buyout. Makes no sense that a guy would sign a contract with such a huge buyout and then go on a job interviewing spree a week later. Regardless, he's still our coordinator today and that's good news.
 
Maroon Eagle

Maroon Eagle

All-American
May 24, 2006
18,415
8,280
102
If the buyout number is true, my thinking is that the interview is mostly pro forma to see if he would be a fit in the future when money issues aren't as big a concern as they are now.
 
Maroon Eagle

Maroon Eagle

All-American
May 24, 2006
18,415
8,280
102
It's not as if State wants to schedule LSU for two games in a football season at home. **
 
P

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
59,440
30,089
113
They're definitely negotiable. If you've got a coach who wants to leave and the only thing preventing it is the buyout, you've got 2 choices. Either negotiate the buyout down or have a disgruntled coach who doesn't want to be there on staff. Option 2 is not a good option.
 
D

Dick Whaefer

Redshirt
Apr 6, 2020
26
0
0
He wouldn’t be paying the buyout. His new employer would be. He signs a new contract for the added year(s) and bump in pay. If reports are true then State adding a large buyout worked- kept potential teams away from hiring him. I am of the belief though that if an LSU or Texas really wants a guy, a buyout is way down on the list of reasons they don’t hire him. They have plenty of money.
 
P

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
59,440
30,089
113
Of course the new employer would pay it. But why would you sign an extension with a large buyout that's going to make you less marketable to new employers right before you start interviewing?
 
Drebin

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
22,049
26,224
113
dawgstudent said:
I'm curious to what makes you say that.
Click to expand...

Given what we knew at the time I posted that, the info we had was that LSU sent a plane to bring he and his wife down all day for discussion. He came back and stayed here. That indicates that he didn't want the job.

If Rosie's info is correct, Arnett and Orgeron have some philosophical differences defensively, and LSU couldn't afford Arnett's buyout. I don't buy the philosophical differences personally because LSU wouldn't have put the full court press on him otherwise. They knew what they would be getting with Arnett.

Reading the tea leaves, I'd say LSU wanted Arnett and thought they could get him for a song, but State wouldn't negotiate on the buyout, and the "philosophical differences" angle is cover for LSU to say they never made an offer.

But that's just me.
 
Drebin

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
22,049
26,224
113
patdog said:
Of course the new employer would pay it. But why would you sign an extension with a large buyout that's going to make you less marketable to new employers right before you start interviewing?
Click to expand...

Maybe it weeds out the posers. I doubt when Arnett signed his extension that he was expecting to get a call from LSU a couple of weeks later, nor was he particularly worried about his marketability. But if he does get calls post-signing...they're probably elite programs and serious players, not just the Marylands and the Rutgers of the world out there "gauging interest."
 
G

Go Budaw

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
patdog said:
They're definitely negotiable. If you've got a coach who wants to leave and the only thing preventing it is the buyout, you've got 2 choices. Either negotiate the buyout down or have a disgruntled coach who doesn't want to be there on staff. Option 2 is not a good option.
Click to expand...

Option 2 is actually the coach works for his new employer while being paid by the current one until they finally cave into whatever the buyout demands are from the new employer. That’s why they are meaningless in terms of preventing coaches from leaving...the new employer has all the leverage. The final buyout amount strictly depends on how big of dicks the new employer want to be.

When Mullen left, we got a whole $500k from UF. That’s it....for the best coach in our school’s history who was hired away by another school in our same 17ing conference. Was the actual amount in our contract with Mullen much, much higher? Of course it was. But what were we going to do...argue for weeks about it it with UF while other candidates are being snapped up left and right and all our recruits are jumping ship? And if you don’t believe that figure, it was listed out in one of the USA Today annual revenue articles about AD budgets and coaching salaries.
 
greenbean.sixpack

greenbean.sixpack

All-American
Oct 6, 2012
9,281
8,684
113
patdog said:
I'm not totally buying the huge buyout. Makes no sense that a guy would sign a contract with such a huge buyout and then go on a job interviewing spree a week later. Regardless, he's still our coordinator today and that's good news.
Click to expand...

I think Steve said the details were worked out during the middle of the season, I'm not sure when it was actually signed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Four Bulldogs pick up preseason honors
  2. 02 Maroon and White Jardin Gilbert speaks on Experience and Seniority in Mississippi State Defensive Backfield
  3. 03 Maroon and White New Belief and depth on Mississippi State D-Line
  4. 04 Maroon and White Scouting Ahead: Alabama QB Battle
  5. 05 Maroon and White Mississippi State HC Jeff Lebby answers question on adding Class of 2022 seniors
Top Bottom