Lively Decision next week!

4UK4life1

All-Conference
Dec 21, 2004
3,142
1,322
111
No, those scenarios are not what I'm talking about.
Before all these guys started flipping their picks to duke, NOBODY said anything about Bona being the better fit, now that there is doubt, we're already seeing the ole "we didn’t want him anyway" posts.
Totally predictable
I definitely wanted Lively, I wanted both obviously. I did however see one person say they thought Bona was a better fit before the duke stuff came out. I believe it was in the Lively set to announce thread when most thought it was good news for KY. I think for most it's clear Lively would have been better but they're perfectly fine with Bona without Lively on board. I know I am
 

jrpross_rivals

Heisman
Feb 21, 2008
17,561
36,107
113
No, those scenarios are not what I'm talking about.
Before all these guys started flipping their picks to duke, NOBODY said anything about Bona being the better fit, now that there is doubt, we're already seeing the ole "we didn’t want him anyway" posts.
Totally predictable
To be fair, I’ve seen a few people say they thought Bona was a better fit over the last couple months or so. But they probably didn’t think Kentucky was getting Lively then either.

Lively is a physical freak of nature. 7’1” with like a 7’8” wingspan. It would have been sweet to add him to this super class. But I also think Rivals has grossly underrated Bona by putting him at 30. I honestly don’t think he’s that big a step down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: westerncat

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,412
99,673
113
We did well against Duke before 2015 when it came to landing higher-end recruits: We beat them for: Wall, Noel, Randle, Poythress, Booker and lost to them for Irving and Parker.

Since then, we've beaten them for Murray, Montgomery, Knox, Gabriel, and if you count transfers - Reid Travis.

During that recent span, they've cleaned our clock for all of the top 5 guys: Ingram, Giles, Bagley, Tatum, Zion, Reddish, Barrett, Johnson, Carey, and now probably Lively. They've also beaten us for a few guys in that 10-15 range: Hurt, Kennard, Bolden, Thornton, etc.

It's kind of sickening at this point. They continue to own Kentucky in the elite battles.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,261
72,027
113
I definitely wanted Lively, I wanted both obviously. I did however see one person say they thought Bona was a better fit before the duke stuff came out. I believe it was in the Lively set to announce thread when most thought it was good news for KY. I think for most it's clear Lively would have been better but they're perfectly fine with Bona without Lively on board. I know I am
There are several in this thread. It's building like a thunderstorm, you can see it happening. All it took was a few dudes switching to Duke and it immediately started.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,261
72,027
113
To be fair, I’ve seen a few people say they thought Bona was a better fit over the last couple months or so. But they probably didn’t think Kentucky was getting Lively then either.

Lively is a physical freak of nature. 7’1” with like a 7’8” wingspan. It would have been sweet to add him to this super class. But I also think Rivals has grossly underrated Bona by putting him at 30. I honestly don’t think he’s that big a step down.
We say every year that so and so is underrated, but I bet Bona is at least close to what they think he is, which is fine if he'd stay here 2 or 3 years, but he'd most likely only stay 1 and have nowhere near the impact Lively will have.

Just wait, if Lively picks Duke, it will be a race to see who can tell everyone how much better a fit Bona would be and that's not even close to true. Lively us better in every way.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,261
72,027
113
Basketball is a guard and wing game now. We've already got the elite guards and wings lined up, and will probably add more.

For me, however, it was about taking Duke down a bit. Guess we'll have to wait even longer for that to happen.
Yup, it's been a guards game for a long time and now it's also about the outside shot.

But yeah, taking food off Duke's table needs to start happening, especially knowing the fact that Sheyer will be their coach
 
  • Like
Reactions: kywildcat41086

tmuck

All-Conference
Oct 2, 2009
10,982
3,850
0
LOL, typical RR, got fans already saying Bona is the better fit.
Don't kid yourself, Lively is the better fit any way you shake it.
We'll get Bona and a big time transfer big. I'm not really worried about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheRick

jrpross_rivals

Heisman
Feb 21, 2008
17,561
36,107
113
We say every year that so and so is underrated, but I bet Bona is at least close to what they think he is, which is fine if he'd stay here 2 or 3 years, but he'd most likely only stay 1 and have nowhere near the impact Lively will have.

Just wait, if Lively picks Duke, it will be a race to see who can tell everyone how much better a fit Bona would be and that's not even close to true. Lively us better in every way.
Rivals is the only service that has him anywhere near this low though. 247 has him at 10, On3 has him 13, and ESPN has him 17. I’m not an expert, but everything I’ve seen of him looks very five-starrish to me.
 

4UK4life1

All-Conference
Dec 21, 2004
3,142
1,322
111
It was Dariq Whitehead that tweeted he had just had a chat with Lively and said something like let’s see how this goes BBN with a bunch of laugh emojis. Some figured he was just stirring the pot including myself but maybe Livey really told him he was coming
 

Bigblue2023

All-American
Jun 22, 2019
2,236
6,984
0
No, those scenarios are not what I'm talking about.
Before all these guys started flipping their picks to duke, NOBODY said anything about Bona being the better fit, now that there is doubt, we're already seeing the ole "we didn’t want him anyway" posts.
Totally predictable


That’s not true at all. I’ve read many posts, although mostly on HOB wondering is Bona was the better fit. Many were saying we need to take Bona now and then take our chances with Lively assuming he’s deciding late.

I don’t see anyone saying we never wanted Lively, I’d take him in a heartbeat. However myself and many others openly thought Bona was a better fit for 1 year of college all along.
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
Even if we get Lively, I still want Bona. Bona is the 5 we need. Lively needs to play the 4 in a 4 out system. His skill set is much better suited to play a stretch 4. Lively would be incredible for us as a stretch 4, IMHO. And Bona would be the perfect complement at the 5. I think it would be like having WCS and Bam together, except Lively has a jumper and WCS never did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: westerncat

CarolinaCatsFan

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2015
1,290
2,086
0
Was totally orchestrated. This includes leaking stuff to make recruiting insiders make picks for UK going into this week. So it gives the appearance that Duke came in and stole away a recruit, when in reality he is already a Duke lean.
1000% dude — no question
 

JAC71

All-American
Jun 28, 2015
5,013
9,422
113
It would be sweet if UK lands commitments from Wallace and Bona the very next day
 

TomTraubertsBlues

All-American
Oct 13, 2014
4,910
8,243
113
Was totally orchestrated. This includes leaking stuff to make recruiting insiders make picks for UK going into this week. So it gives the appearance that Duke came in and stole away a recruit, when in reality he is already a Duke lean.
A bit conspiracy theory-ish for me, but wouldn't put it past them, after getting Bolden to follow Brad the day before he committed to Duke. Dick move.
 

LmdCat

Heisman
Jan 8, 2006
23,627
18,894
0
Really wanted lively to. Pick UK
7 footer that can shoot, rare ability
Tired of losing recruits to duke
AD could shoot too but you would have never known it based on how he was anchored under the basket. So, why do you think Lively would ever get the chance to display his outside shooting at UK? I wouldn't be surprised to learn that this is some of the negative recruiting that Duke has used against coming to UK. If I was recruiting against UK, I would ask the recruit if UK showed him any video of how they have previously used other versatile big men anywhere other than under the basket?
 
Last edited:

OmahaCats

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2020
2,209
2,740
0
LOL, typical RR, got fans already saying Bona is the better fit.
Don't kid yourself, Lively is the better fit any way you shake it.
Lively is clearly better. Bona looks great. But he’s not Lively. Plus I’d rather have a 7ft plus guy. Bona is 6’9” or 6’10”
 
  • Like
Reactions: gharding07

OmahaCats

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2020
2,209
2,740
0
We did well against Duke before 2015 when it came to landing higher-end recruits: We beat them for: Wall, Noel, Randle, Poythress, Booker and lost to them for Irving and Parker.

Since then, we've beaten them for Murray, Montgomery, Knox, Gabriel, and if you count transfers - Reid Travis.

During that recent span, they've cleaned our clock for all of the top 5 guys: Ingram, Giles, Bagley, Tatum, Zion, Reddish, Barrett, Johnson, Carey, and now probably Lively. They've also beaten us for a few guys in that 10-15 range: Hurt, Kennard, Bolden, Thornton, etc.

It's kind of sickening at this point. They continue to own Kentucky in the elite battles.
It’s a new
Recruiting battle. We have a new staff. They have a new head coach soon. The past is irrelevant. Kentucky is showing they can recruit elite talent again. We’ll be great. Kentucky and Duke might just both be the kings of recruiting
 

UK-Chulo

All-American
Mar 22, 2007
3,472
5,005
98
Really wanted lively to. Pick UK
7 footer that can shoot, rare ability
Tired of losing recruits to duke
Here's how I've felt all along. Cal is not going to let a 7-footer shoot. So if push comes to shove Bona probably fits what we need more than the player with a much higher ceiling. The ceiling we don't benefit from while he is at UK. But we can use a low post banger to grab boards and bully SEC front court players.

Not saying Lively wouldn't be great to get, but one is for the NBA and one may contribute more to winning college games.
 

akaukswoosh

Hall of Famer
Jan 14, 2006
81,347
124,913
93
Here's how I've felt all along. Cal is not going to let a 7-footer shoot. So if push comes to shove Bona probably fits what we need more than the player with a much higher ceiling. The ceiling we don't benefit from while he is at UK. But we can use a low post banger to grab boards and bully SEC front court players.

Not saying Lively wouldn't be great to get, but one is for the NBA and one may contribute more to winning college games.
He let Sarr shoot all he wanted. Lively is a UK type player and Flip is a pure Duke player but looking like they got both. smh
 

$Z71$

All-American
Nov 14, 2002
3,718
6,030
0
We did well against Duke before 2015 when it came to landing higher-end recruits: We beat them for: Wall, Noel, Randle, Poythress, Booker and lost to them for Irving and Parker.

Since then, we've beaten them for Murray, Montgomery, Knox, Gabriel, and if you count transfers - Reid Travis.

During that recent span, they've cleaned our clock for all of the top 5 guys: Ingram, Giles, Bagley, Tatum, Zion, Reddish, Barrett, Johnson, Carey, and now probably Lively. They've also beaten us for a few guys in that 10-15 range: Hurt, Kennard, Bolden, Thornton, etc.

It's kind of sickening at this point. They continue to own Kentucky in the elite battles.
Im glad that recruiting titles isn’t a thing then. We’ve done just fine and none of the above mentioned recruits were that big of a miss over who we ended up with. It’s the nature of the beast, but at the end of the day doesn’t count for anything. They don’t give out championships for landing a recruit.
 

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,944
34,463
113
honestly I think Lively is overrated and I'll take Bona who plays with a chip on his shoulder and is stronger . but Lively is better defensively and can hit the face up jumper some. I think in year one, Bona will be able to rebound and bang inside better than lively and if you already have stars like Sharpe and Livingston, Bona would definitely do well with them. if and thats if we get Bona or someone comparable to him, imo its no real huge deal of missing on Lively outside of Cal losing a player to Scheyer ....yuck
 

TomTraubertsBlues

All-American
Oct 13, 2014
4,910
8,243
113
Listening to the Sources Say podcast, and based on what they are saying, everyone at Duke and UK were of the mind it was going to be UK, and then over the next few hours it did a 180. Very fishy. They talked about a guy called Tipton Edits, sorry but I don't know who that is, and that he is one of the 3 people who know what Lively is going and he won't tell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarolinaCatsFan

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,944
34,463
113
LOL, typical RR, got fans already saying Bona is the better fit.
Don't kid yourself, Lively is the better fit any way you shake it.
I would say it depends.. are sec refs gonna start calling it when teams manhandle our bigs down low? physicality is a great equalizer if refs let it go and they always do against us...... so at any other school i think Lively would be better but at UK.... its possible that the stronger guy with a chip on his shoulder would do the little things for us to win more. maybe... i mean for all i know lively might be a player that wants to fight through contact ... its just i dont get that impression from his highlights