He wants it to go to the Supreme Court where he thinks he’s stacked the deck in his favor with a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court. If you have evidence go to court if you don’t have evidence you’re wasting everyone’s time. I don’t know how you can’t tell the difference. The reason why you are so confused is because the rambling was what I was originally talking about which you didn’t care about you saw the word Jew in my post got triggered didn’t read any of the things I actually said and went on a side rant about Jews Israel and Obama. You brought up Obama sir. I have nothing to say about him because he is irrelevant to the discussion at hand I then gave an example of how Obama handles transition of power compared to trump that is literally the only reason I even typed his name. Now kindly reread our entire discussion or just shut up. I’m not interested in what Obama did 4 years ago at this moment. Again for the 100th time I would like to talk about how trump is circumventing the process without evidence hoping the Supreme Court will back him up, or the fact that he is going into meetings with heads of states trying to pressure them into just giving the votes to himself. But you don’t want to actually talk about that. It’s misdirection to change the discussion. It’s sensationalizing things that I say to make my points seem crazy. It’s ridiculous and high school debate team crap. But you learn from the best
You think it is a real thing that the Supreme Court is going to not apply the law and do whatever they want because they have an agenda? I don't have to sensationalise anything, you do "crazy" very well, all by yourself. And it's worth noting that what you suggest is how liberal judges rule, not the way conservative judges rule.
Do you know that someone, even without evidence or a good legal argument, is allowed by law to file a lawsuit. If that person doesn't have a sound case, it will go away eventually. You keep throwing a fit about how he has no evidence, but that doesn't mean he can't pursue a legal remedy. I don't think you understand what "circumvent" means.
You claimed prior to Trump that our system of democracy was peachy-keen, and that Trump is destroying it. O'bama was the president immediately before Trump. I was simply pointing out the egrigious acts of the president at that time, which was a direct assault on democracy, and which you were comparing to Trumps legal and transparent actions in this democracy.
It is also worth noting that commas and periods are a good thing.
If you want to go find your safe space now because you're scared the Supreme Court is going to crown Trump, please do. Wimp.