****** LIVE ******

[Mrs.Jeans15]

Flynn pled guilty to keep the FBI from bankrupting his family and going after his kid.

When they knew Flynn did nothing wrong. They were dropping his case in October because they had nothing.

Then Joe Biden brought up the Logsn act and they had a abnormal meeting with Flynn telling him he didnt need a lawyer and if he did it would make the process harder by bringing in the Justice dept.

Dont listen to Democrats they are dumb and dont know anything thing but their feelings.

 

[JoelBittner]

Some people just don’t know how to take an L. Retain some dignity

Another gratuitous attack on Pelosi/Schiff/Schumer/Obama/Yates and Biden? To be honest I can't disagree with you. I guess their reluctance to accept the 2016 election is why they conspired to cheat in 2020.

https://justthenews.com/politics-po...gan-residents-swear-under-oath-they-witnessed

The media mantra that there is no evidence of voter fraud in the Nov. 3 election for the first time faces a real challenge. Several Michigan residents — ranging from a city worker to a former state assistant attorney general — swear under penalty of perjury they witnessed significant and widespread election tampering in the city of Detroit.


And by significant, they insist thousands of ballots were involved.


Take, for instance, longtime city of Detroit employee Jessy Jacob, who provided among the most startling accounts.


Jacob stated in an affidavit she personally witnessed — and in some cases was instructed — to backdate thousands of absentee ballots the day after the election to make them appear legal even though they were not in the Qualified Vote File and had not arrived by the deadline.


"On November 4, 2020, I was instructed to improperly pre-date the absentee ballots receive date that were not in the QVF as if they had been received on or before November 3, 2020," she testified. "I was told to alter the information in the QVF to falsely show that the absentee ballots had been received in time to be valid. I estimate that this was done to thousands of ballots."

Jacob's claim is stunning. Not only does she risk perjury if she lied, she could lose her livelihood as a city worker.


Just the News reviewed more than a dozen affidavits filed in various election challenge lawsuits in Michigan. All witnesses, like Jacob, signed the affidavits and had them notarized, making them subject to Michigan's perjury law.


Jacob described how she was assigned to work the city's election back in September and for weeks witnessed systemic election fraud and tampering with voters at multiple locations.


"I processed absentee ballot packages to be sent to voters while I worked at the election headquarters in September 2020 along with 70-80 other poll workers," her affidavit stated. "I was instructed by my supervisor to adjust the mailing date of these absentee ballot packages to be dated earlier than they were actually sent. The supervisor was making announcements for all workers to engage in this practice.


"I directly observed, on a daily basis, City of Detroit election workers and employees coaching and trying to coach voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. I witnessed these workers and employees encouraging voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. I witnessed these election workers and employees going over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote."


Officials for the city election clerk's office did not immediately return a call seeking comment.


Alexandra Seely, a Michigan voter who worked as a GOP poll challenger, recounted in a handwritten affidavit how her challenges to suspect ballots were summarily ignored and she was "harassed and threatened" for raising concerns.


"I challenged 10 votes at table 23, they would not take out the log to record my challenges," Seely's affidavit stated. "I had to write names and ballot numbers on my own. I asked to make incident reports. They would not allow me, and said they will make a note in the computer. They did not and proceeded to keep counting."

Zachary Larsen, a GOP lawyer who until earlier this year worked for the state of Michigan as an assistant attorney general, swore in his affidavit he witnessed poll workers violating the secrecy of ballots, apparently peeking to see whom a voter had supported before deciding whether to put them in a pile of problematic ballots that might not count. A fellow poll watcher joined him for part of the observations


"Beyond the legal requirements for maintaining ballot secrecy, both of us were concerned that the violations of the secrecy of the ballot that we witnessed could be or were being used to manipulate which ballots were placed in the 'problem ballots' box," his affidavit alleged.


Larsen also stated he saw evidence the ballots were being approved for non-eligible voters.


"I was concerned that this practice of assigning names and numbers indicated that a ballot was being counted for a non-eligible voter who was not in either the poll book or the supplemental poll book," his affidavit stated.


"From my observation of the computer screen, the voters were certainly not in the official poll book," Larsen stated. "Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots I had personally observed being scanned."

Robert Cushman, another poll observer in Detroit, submitted an affidavit that described behavior almost identical to that which the city worker Jacob said she engaged in. Cushman said he saw large swaths of ballots being counted the day after the election for voters who were not in the authorized list of names. In some cases, he added, fake birth dates were being used to fill in birth dates.


"I challenged the authority and the authenticity of all of these ballots that were being processed late with absolutely no accompanying documentation, no corresponding name in the QVF, and no corresponding name in the Supplemental List," Cushman's affidavit stated.


"Every ballot was being fraudulently and manually entered into the Electronic Poll Book (QVF), as having been born on January 1, 1900," Cushman continued. "This 'last' batch of ballots was processed in the 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. time frame. When I asked about this impossibility of each ballot having the same birthday occurring in 1900, I was told that was the instruction that came down from the Wayne County Clerk's office."

 

[JoelBittner]

And there you have it, folks - cold, hard evidence of election fraud, because one candidate drew more people to his "rally's."

Call off the transition. The mouth-breathing goobers with way too much time on their hands have spoken.

Would you agree with me that the married serial plagiarist, bigot and sexual predator in this video is trying to hold black people down and therefore probably isn't the "uniter" this country needs? Especially since there is an abundance of evidence he has violated many laws related to bribery, sexual assault, voter fraud and racketeering?

 

[6OSK3RS]

Another gratuitous attack on Pelosi/Schiff/Schumer/Obama/Yates and Biden? To be honest I can't disagree with you. I guess their reluctance to accept the 2016 election is why they conspired to cheat in 2020.

https://justthenews.com/politics-po...gan-residents-swear-under-oath-they-witnessed

The media mantra that there is no evidence of voter fraud in the Nov. 3 election for the first time faces a real challenge. Several Michigan residents — ranging from a city worker to a former state assistant attorney general — swear under penalty of perjury they witnessed significant and widespread election tampering in the city of Detroit.


And by significant, they insist thousands of ballots were involved.


Take, for instance, longtime city of Detroit employee Jessy Jacob, who provided among the most startling accounts.


Jacob stated in an affidavit she personally witnessed — and in some cases was instructed — to backdate thousands of absentee ballots the day after the election to make them appear legal even though they were not in the Qualified Vote File and had not arrived by the deadline.


"On November 4, 2020, I was instructed to improperly pre-date the absentee ballots receive date that were not in the QVF as if they had been received on or before November 3, 2020," she testified. "I was told to alter the information in the QVF to falsely show that the absentee ballots had been received in time to be valid. I estimate that this was done to thousands of ballots."

Jacob's claim is stunning. Not only does she risk perjury if she lied, she could lose her livelihood as a city worker.


Just the News reviewed more than a dozen affidavits filed in various election challenge lawsuits in Michigan. All witnesses, like Jacob, signed the affidavits and had them notarized, making them subject to Michigan's perjury law.


Jacob described how she was assigned to work the city's election back in September and for weeks witnessed systemic election fraud and tampering with voters at multiple locations.


"I processed absentee ballot packages to be sent to voters while I worked at the election headquarters in September 2020 along with 70-80 other poll workers," her affidavit stated. "I was instructed by my supervisor to adjust the mailing date of these absentee ballot packages to be dated earlier than they were actually sent. The supervisor was making announcements for all workers to engage in this practice.


"I directly observed, on a daily basis, City of Detroit election workers and employees coaching and trying to coach voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. I witnessed these workers and employees encouraging voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. I witnessed these election workers and employees going over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote."


Officials for the city election clerk's office did not immediately return a call seeking comment.


Alexandra Seely, a Michigan voter who worked as a GOP poll challenger, recounted in a handwritten affidavit how her challenges to suspect ballots were summarily ignored and she was "harassed and threatened" for raising concerns.


"I challenged 10 votes at table 23, they would not take out the log to record my challenges," Seely's affidavit stated. "I had to write names and ballot numbers on my own. I asked to make incident reports. They would not allow me, and said they will make a note in the computer. They did not and proceeded to keep counting."

Zachary Larsen, a GOP lawyer who until earlier this year worked for the state of Michigan as an assistant attorney general, swore in his affidavit he witnessed poll workers violating the secrecy of ballots, apparently peeking to see whom a voter had supported before deciding whether to put them in a pile of problematic ballots that might not count. A fellow poll watcher joined him for part of the observations


"Beyond the legal requirements for maintaining ballot secrecy, both of us were concerned that the violations of the secrecy of the ballot that we witnessed could be or were being used to manipulate which ballots were placed in the 'problem ballots' box," his affidavit alleged.


Larsen also stated he saw evidence the ballots were being approved for non-eligible voters.


"I was concerned that this practice of assigning names and numbers indicated that a ballot was being counted for a non-eligible voter who was not in either the poll book or the supplemental poll book," his affidavit stated.


"From my observation of the computer screen, the voters were certainly not in the official poll book," Larsen stated. "Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots I had personally observed being scanned."

Robert Cushman, another poll observer in Detroit, submitted an affidavit that described behavior almost identical to that which the city worker Jacob said she engaged in. Cushman said he saw large swaths of ballots being counted the day after the election for voters who were not in the authorized list of names. In some cases, he added, fake birth dates were being used to fill in birth dates.


"I challenged the authority and the authenticity of all of these ballots that were being processed late with absolutely no accompanying documentation, no corresponding name in the QVF, and no corresponding name in the Supplemental List," Cushman's affidavit stated.


"Every ballot was being fraudulently and manually entered into the Electronic Poll Book (QVF), as having been born on January 1, 1900," Cushman continued. "This 'last' batch of ballots was processed in the 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. time frame. When I asked about this impossibility of each ballot having the same birthday occurring in 1900, I was told that was the instruction that came down from the Wayne County Clerk's office."

Thank you. I mentioned the affidavits earlier but they carry no weight to the average American leftist. It is disgusting how democrats hate any whistle blower who isn't doing it for their causes.

 

[bshirt73]

Our country is a sht show and it's not because of Trump.

100% correct to say the least.

 

[huskernation1973]

Okay, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt you're not a Bloomberg with no core values who just jumps on the bandwagon of whoever the MSM anoints as prom king. But ask yourself this: Trump draws 20-40 thousand to every rally and Joe can't even get 100 people to show for his rally's
And then on election day Joe gets more votes than Obama got in 2008 and 2012? So in your mind Trump lost because of his mouth and those same people have no problem with a guy who is functionally illiterate as a result of being senile? That computes for you?
And BTW, I made my voice clear that mail-in voting (as opposed to absentee ballot) was a bad idea BEFORE the election, so you are factually wrong with your claim I was for it until Joe was declared the victor by a press which has stated point blank they would do anything to defeat DJT.

I'll know you're serious in your position if you comment on the post below. I am troubled you haven't clicked on the videos I've posted demonstrating there is clear and objective evidence supporting my position.

And why am I supposed to believe that Biden supporters are more likely to cheat than people that will do anything to make sure Trump stays in office?

No one has been able to answer that question.

I'd tell you to find a hobby, but I suspect you already have.

You might enjoy this tidbit:

https://kabir-naim.medium.com/dr-shiva-ayyadurai-the-danger-of-data-charlatans-4f675ffe793c

 

[50Front]

And why am I supposed to believe that Biden supporters are more likely to cheat than people that will do anything to make sure Trump stays in office?

No one has been able to answer that question.

I'd tell you to find a hobby, but I suspect you already have.

You might enjoy this tidbit:

https://kabir-naim.medium.com/dr-shiva-ayyadurai-the-danger-of-data-charlatans-4f675ffe793c

Did you actually read the attachment?

This guy states: "Why Ayyadurai Is Probably Wrong". 'Probably' being the keyword. He then states in his summation:

It’s possible I misinterpreted what the Dr. here was trying to say, or maybe I missed some footnote/slide where he controlled for this astoundingly simple and natural explanation for the pattern he observed.
But right now it’s just looking like a bit of dangerous misinformation. People are very quick to trust something just because it’s got some numbers on it — especially if it agrees with them — but numbers don’t make an analysis bulletproof. Not inspecting even the quant-iest of presentations can leave you vulnerable to this new breed of snake-oil salesman. Case in point: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai. U.S. Senate Candidate. That goes double for me, too. Inspect my argument carefully. If you see trouble, send me a rebuttal right here.

So it's possible he might have misinterpreted the article. So he discredits his own rebuttal. In addition, he tries to discredit Dr. Ayyadurai by saying his work is disingenuous because he's a potential Senate candidate. What does that have to do with anything? In final, he states numbers don't make an analysis bulletproof - well it definitely helps don't ya think? Kind of like Biden saying "we choose truth over facts".

Who is this guy anyways? Good grief *facepalm*

 

[JoelBittner]

Did you actually read the attachment?
But right now it’s just looking like a bit of dangerous misinformation. People are very quick to trust something just because it’s got some numbers on it — especially if it agrees with them — but numbers don’t make an analysis bulletproof. Not inspecting even the quant-iest of presentations can leave you vulnerable to this new breed of snake-oil salesman. Case in point: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai. U.S. Senate Candidate. That goes double for me, too. Inspect my argument carefully. If you see trouble, send me a rebuttal right here.

So it's possible he might have misinterpreted the article. So he discredits his own rebuttal. In addition, he tries to discredit Dr. Ayyadurai by saying his work is disingenuous because he's a potential Senate candidate. What does that have to do with anything? In final, he states numbers don't make an analysis bulletproof - well it definitely helps don't ya think? Kind of like Biden saying "we choose truth over facts".

Who is this guy anyways? Good grief *facepalm*

Oh I love this collection of words. Especially the ones in bolded red. So the Dums says not to trust something if it relies on numbers!
I seem to recall myself questioning the Covid-19 numbers since last spring. And I seem to remember the same old alts on this board kept telling me that this scamdemic was a threat to the entire population. And I kept repeating this flu is a threat to the same people every other flu is a threat too. And why we are idiots to destroy/alter our lives because of it.
And now the walking-dead Coup leader wants a 90 day total shut down. @leodisflowers, can ya see why it's a bad idea to support this coup d'etat?

 

[GBRforLife1]

And why am I supposed to believe that Biden supporters are more likely to cheat than people that will do anything to make sure Trump stays in office?

No one has been able to answer that question.

I'd tell you to find a hobby, but I suspect you already have.

You might enjoy this tidbit:

https://kabir-naim.medium.com/dr-shiva-ayyadurai-the-danger-of-data-charlatans-4f675ffe793c

Yet you have no problem believing people who made up lies about Russia collusion and spent 4 years telling you they'd do anything they could to get Trump out of power. #LiberalLogic

You may want to get that TDS checked.

 

[huskernation1973]

Did you actually read the attachment?

This guy states: "Why Ayyadurai Is Probably Wrong". 'Probably' being the keyword. He then states in his summation:

It’s possible I misinterpreted what the Dr. here was trying to say, or maybe I missed some footnote/slide where he controlled for this astoundingly simple and natural explanation for the pattern he observed.
But right now it’s just looking like a bit of dangerous misinformation. People are very quick to trust something just because it’s got some numbers on it — especially if it agrees with them — but numbers don’t make an analysis bulletproof. Not inspecting even the quant-iest of presentations can leave you vulnerable to this new breed of snake-oil salesman. Case in point: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai. U.S. Senate Candidate. That goes double for me, too. Inspect my argument carefully. If you see trouble, send me a rebuttal right here.

So it's possible he might have misinterpreted the article. So he discredits his own rebuttal. In addition, he tries to discredit Dr. Ayyadurai by saying his work is disingenuous because he's a potential Senate candidate. What does that have to do with anything? In final, he states numbers don't make an analysis bulletproof - well it definitely helps don't ya think? Kind of like Biden saying "we choose truth over facts".

Who is this guy anyways? Good grief *facepalm*

And Joel's mention of Ayyaduri was also an instance when he (Ayyaduri) "might" have found 69,000 votes, so it appears they might both be talking out of their arses.

And I'm still waiting for someone to tell me, with actual proof and evidence, how it is that Trump supporters are somehow less likely to cheat than Biden supporters.

 

[huskernation1973]

Yet you have no problem believing people who made up lies about Russia collusion and spent 4 years telling you they'd do anything they could to get Trump out of power. #LiberalLogic

You may want to get that TDS checked.

I've never said anything about Russia. But for the record, no, I don't believe they actively colluded. I DO however, believe, per our intel folks, that the Russians did try to do things to help Trump win.

Now that we got your deflection out of the way, can you tell me how it is that a Trump supporter is less likely to cheat than Biden supporter?

If cheating is so easy, why am I supposed to believe, with no proof, that only one side does it?

 

[mwulf]

The cheating was so intricate that they kept Republican senators in power but not the President. This was a landslide.. You have to call it that way because we were told 2016 was a landslide and this is a wider margin

 

[leodisflowers]

Oh I love this collection of words. Especially the ones in bolded red. So the Dums says not to trust something if it relies on numbers!
I seem to recall myself questioning the Covid-19 numbers since last spring. And I seem to remember the same old alts on this board kept telling me that this scamdemic was a threat to the entire population. And I kept repeating this flu is a threat to the same people every other flu is a threat too. And why we are idiots to destroy/alter our lives because of it.
And now the walking-dead Coup leader wants a 90 day total shut down. @leodisflowers, can ya see why it's a bad idea to support this coup d'etat?

Please tell me how I am supporting a coup... I'll wait.

 

[mwulf]

Speaking of coups...I mean it wont work, but burning the place to the ground on the way out seems pretty unAmerican. Surprised the cult cant see this for what it is.



also cant miss out on one last grift from his minions

 

[GBRforLife1]

I've never said anything about Russia. But for the record, no, I don't believe they actively colluded. I DO however, believe, per our intel folks, that the Russians did try to do things to help Trump win.

Now that we got your deflection out of the way, can you tell me how it is that a Trump supporter is less likely to cheat than Biden supporter?

If cheating is so easy, why am I supposed to believe, with no proof, that only one side does it?

The answer to this question will shed some light on how you're viewing it incorrectly.

When you say "only one side does it" what side are you referring to and what do believe the other side is?

 

[huskernation1973]

The answer to this question will shed some light on how you're viewing it incorrectly.

When you say "only one side does it" what side are you referring to and what do believe the other side is?

I'm referring to the belief of Trump worshippers that if there was voter fraud, it was only done by Biden supporters, or that the dead people that voted only cast votes for Biden.

Why am I supposed to believe those accusations?

 

[schuele]

Please tell me how I am supporting a coup... I'll wait.

Thank you for speaking out on behalf of functional adults who, regardless of whether they like or dislike the outcome of this election, just want to get on with their lives.

Thankfully, the vast majority of people recognize that pissing away hour after hour, day after freaking day, copying and pasting bucketloads of mindless ******** to internet message boards is not a good use of one's time, regardless of which tribe it originates from. Too bad the exceptions seem to love camping out here, screaming the same crap over and over again.

 

[GBRforLife1]

I'm referring to the belief of Trump worshippers that if there was voter fraud, it was only done by Biden supporters, or that the dead people that voted only cast votes for Biden.

Why am I supposed to believe those accusations?

Because it's Trump supporters against everyone else. Those are the 2 sides. It's not Dem vs GOP. And one of those sides is much more prevalent in the do nothing liberal govt.

 

[Mrs.Jeans15]

The cheating was so intricate that they kept Republican senators in power but not the President. This was a landslide.. You have to call it that way because we were told 2016 was a landslide and this is a wider margin

They had the highest turnout ever and lost seats in the house even in states Biden won.

Yeah right.

Anytime Democrats turnout they dominate. What happened?
Most votes ever and they are losing house seats in Democrat districts.

That doesn't compute to most votes ever.

Trump had 11 million more people vote for him than 2016 and Dems loss some minority vote and they are winning seats they lost in 2018.

They cheated.

 

[huskernation1973]

Because it's Trump supporters against everyone else. Those are the 2 sides. It's not Dem vs GOP. And one of those sides is much more prevalent in the do nothing liberal govt.

So by your rationale, it would seem to me that the Trump supporters are more likely to cheat. Not sure what you're getting at.

Just say that you have no proof that the anti-Trump side would be the only ones to cheat.

 

[dinglefritz]

They had the highest turnout ever and lost seats in the house even in states Biden won.

Yeah right.

Anytime Democrats turnout they dominate. What happened?
Most votes ever and they are losing house seats in Democrat districts.

That doesn't compute to most votes ever.

Trump had 11 million more people vote for him than 2016 and Dems loss some minority vote and they are winning seats they lost in 2018.

They cheated.

exactly. There's way to many coincidences in voting patterns including a popular young black Republican leading by a bunch losing the mail in black vote for Senator to an old fat white liberal incumbent when the votes were tallied in Detroit. Not likely.

 

[GBRforLife1]

So by your rational, it would seem to me that the Trump supporters are more likely to cheat. Not sure what you're getting at.

Just say that you have no proof that the anti-Trump side would be the only ones to cheat.

What are you looking for? A signed affidavit where a person identifies themself as an unscrupulous never-trumper? Don't be a clown.

You'd expect a glitch or mistakes to go both directions. It obviously hasn't. Whether they find enough to change the results, we'll see.

 

[huskernation1973]

They had the highest turnout ever and lost seats in the house even in states Biden won.

Yeah right.

Anytime Democrats turnout they dominate. What happened?
Most votes ever and they are losing house seats in Democrat districts.

That doesn't compute to most votes ever.

Trump had 11 million more people vote for him than 2016 and Dems loss some minority vote and they are winning seats they lost in 2018.

They cheated.

So, in your world, everyone always votes a straight ticket until now, so there must be cheating? That's interesting, because I'm nearing 50, and this is the first time I voted a straight ticket in any general or mid-term election.

You're making this much more complicated that it is.

There was a lot of people that voted for Trump because he wasn't Hillary. Not too far fetched to believe that some of those people voted for Biden because he wasn't Trump.

Biden won more counties in FL than Hillary did, and yet he lost--because Trump did better with the Hispanic vote in Miami-Dade (Hillary won that county by almost 30%; Biden won it by 10%).

Biden did better in the Philly area suburban counties than Hillary did, as well as some other areas of the state. That's why he won PA.

People from both parties voted to get rid of Trump because they felt he is a POS. I don't get why you don't understand that.

 

[huskernation1973]

What are you looking for? A signed affidavit where a person identifies themself as an unscrupulous never-trumper? Don't be a clown.

You'd expect a glitch or mistakes to go both directions. It obviously hasn't. Whether they find enough to change the results, we'll see.

You're talking out of your ***.

Just say you have no proof that only Biden supporters would cheat, and we'll move on.

 

[Mrs.Jeans15]

So, in your world, everyone always votes a straight ticket until now, so there must be cheating? That's interesting, because I'm nearing 50, and this is the first time I voted a straight ticket in any general or mid-term election.

You're making this much more complicated that it is.

There was a lot of people that voted for Trump because he wasn't Hillary. Not too far fetched to believe that some of those people voted for Biden because he wasn't Trump.

Biden won more counties in FL than Hillary did, and yet he lost--because Trump did better with the Hispanic vote in Miami-Dade (Hillary won that county by almost 30%; Biden won it by 10%).

Biden did better in the Philly area suburban counties than Hillary did, as well as some other areas of the state. That's why he won PA.

People from both parties voted to get rid of Trump because they felt he is a POS. I don't get why you don't understand that.

80% usually vote straight down ticket.

No way Democrats are going to support Trump supporting Republicans in Democrat states.

Democrats lost support among blacks and Hispanics

They had the most votes ever and keep losing seats.

People in traditional Democrat states aren't going to vote Republican in this climate. No way. We are totally divided.

Because they know they need the House and the Senate to implement their policies.

 

[mwulf]

They had the highest turnout ever and lost seats in the house even in states Biden won.

Yeah right.

Anytime Democrats turnout they dominate. What happened?
Most votes ever and they are losing house seats in Democrat districts.

That doesn't compute to most votes ever.

Trump had 11 million more people vote for him than 2016 and Dems loss some minority vote and they are winning seats they lost in 2018.

They cheated.

Does everyone just vote the same party on their ballot top to bottom? I sure as hell dont. This was the most secure election of our lives. Its legit and if anyone remotely cares about the future of the country they would demand those in the White House that are trying to hold up the transfer teams be relieved of their duties immediately. Its time for adults to take over

 

[huskernation1973]

80% usually vote straight down ticket.

No way Democrats are going to support Trump supporting Republicans in Democrat states.

Democrats lost support among blacks and Hispanics

They had the most votes ever and keep losing seats.

People in traditional Democrat states aren't going to vote Republican in this climate. No way. We are totally divided.

Because they know they need the House and the Senate to implement their policies.

Pretty interesting that you seem willing to accept the "bucking of the trend" in Trump winning WI, MI, and PA in 2016, but there's no possible way that a trend can be bucked in 2020.

The Nebraska 2nd elected Biden, and yet still sent their GOP Congressman back to Washington. Are you saying that there were fraudulent votes there?

 

[GBRforLife1]

You're talking out of your ***.

I had to figure out a way to get on your level. Bye.

 

[GBRforLife1]

Does everyone just vote the same party on their ballot top to bottom? I sure as hell dont. This was the most secure election of our lives. Its legit and if anyone remotely cares about the future of the country they would demand those in the White House that are trying to hold up the transfer teams be relieved of their duties immediately. Its time for adults to take over

Do you really believe you're representative of the majority of voters?

 

[huskernation1973]

I had to figure out a way to get on your level. Bye.

So, no proof. Thanks for confirming.

 

[mwulf]

 

[huskernation1973]

exactly. There's way to many coincidences in voting patterns including a popular young black Republican leading by a bunch losing the mail in black vote for Senator to an old fat white liberal incumbent when the votes were tallied in Detroit. Not likely.

I thought someone had gone over this with you before---

2018 US Senate- Wayne County (Detroit)
Debbie Stabenow- Age 68 (D): 69.1%
John James (R): 29.0%

2020 US Senate- Wayne County (Detroit)
Gary Peters- Age 62 (D): 67.2%
John James (R): 30.5%

Given the 2018 results, Peters winning Detroit seems pretty likely to me. Or are you now going to tell us there was fraud then as well?

And while I have you- who was the US Senator that told your friend about all the fraud?

 

[schuele]

exactly. There's way to many coincidences in voting patterns including a popular young black Republican leading by a bunch losing the mail in black vote for Senator to an old fat white liberal incumbent when the votes were tallied in Detroit. Not likely.

You already made the mistake of screaming this nonsense outside of your echo chamber, and it was easily debunked.

Did you even know that John James ran two years ago? Debbie Stabenow beat him even worse in the Detroit metro area than Gary Peters did, despite Donald Trump being nowhere on the ballot. Do five minutes of research next time, and you won't look a complete fool who has no Earthly idea what he's talking about.

 

[schuele]

I thought someone had gone over this with you before---

2018 US Senate- Wayne County (Detroit)
Debbie Stabenow- Age 68 (D): 69.1%
John James (R): 29.0%

2020 US Senate- Wayne County (Detroit)
Gary Peters- Age 62 (D): 67.2%
John James (R): 30.5%

Given the 2018 results, Peters winning Detroit seems pretty likely to me. Or are you now going to tell us there was fraud then as well?

And while I have you- who was the US Senator that told your friend about all the fraud?

The gymnastics displayed in this thread are hilarious. We're supposed to believe that people not voting a straight party ticket is proof of voter fraud. And almost in the same breath, we should be appalled because a black Republican Senate candidate performed poorly in Detroit (almost, but not quite, as poorly as two years ago).

Four years ago I tired very quickly of all the blubbering and pants-pissing about how Hillary Clinton had the election stolen from her. But the dipshittery displayed this time around will easily put that to shame.

 

[MOHUSKER]

exactly. There's way to many coincidences in voting patterns including a popular young black Republican leading by a bunch losing the mail in black vote for Senator to an old fat white liberal incumbent when the votes were tallied in Detroit. Not likely.

So you support James? Because you’ve been very outspoken that systemic racism doesn’t exist, but James has shared his very experiences and says it does exist.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/us/politics/john-james-michigan-senate.html

Mr. James’s response is simply that he is an American. But other answers haven’t come so easily. He said his impulse after seeing the Floyd tape was to call his father and head to a Black Lives Matter protest.

Mr. Trump won Michigan in 2016 by just 10,000 votes — his thinnest margin in any state. But that edge is gone today. Public polling, along with private Republican surveys of the state, show Mr. Trump has slipped far behind former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., in some cases by double digits. And while the latest internal Republican surveys show Mr. James doing slightly better than the president, Republicans familiar with the numbers said he was still behind.

 

[huskernation1973]

The gymnastics displayed in this thread are hilarious. We're supposed to believe that people not voting a straight party ticket is proof of voter fraud. And almost in the same breath, we should be appalled because a black Republican Senate candidate performed poorly in Detroit (almost, but not quite, as poorly as two years ago).

Four years ago I tired very quickly of all the blubbering and pants-pissing about how Hillary Clinton had the election stolen from her. But the dipshittery displayed this time around will easily put that to shame.

The other fun part of this is the hollering about the media referring to Biden as the "president-elect", even though the media has done this every other election I can remember, including 2016.

 

[GBRforLife1]

So, no proof. Thanks for confirming.

Maybe you could apply your super spot on deductive reasoning skills to find out why there are no votes for Trump from anyone born in 1900? Yet there are for Biden...

 

[huskernation1973]

Maybe you could apply your super spot on deductive reasoning skills to find out why there are no votes for Trump from anyone born in 1900? Yet there are for Biden...

Maybe you can educate yourself. The head of the CISA is a Trump appointee that is likely to be fired soon because he dares to debunk the ********.

Second one down on Rumor Control as of 8:22 am.

BTW- And your proof that the "person" born in 1900 voted for Biden is......?

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-g...wsuit-never-cast-ballot-michigan-records-show

 

[GBRforLife1]

Maybe you can educate yourself. The head of the CISA is a Trump appointee that is likely to be fired soon because he dares to debunk the ********.

Second one down on Rumor Control as of 8:22 am.

BTW- And your proof that the "person" born in 1900 voted for Biden is......?

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-g...wsuit-never-cast-ballot-michigan-records-show

That's a lot of words to say you can't answer it. I guess you have no proof.

 

[huskernation1973]

That's a lot of words to say you can't answer it. I guess you have no proof.

You're right. I can't answer why there was someone born in 1900 that voted for Biden--especially when there's no proof that such a thing actually occurred.

I'll take your inquiry to mean that you have zero interest in reading something from a Trump appointee that actually debunks what you're claiming.

OK. Good to know.