****** LIVE ******
- Thread starter JoelBittner
- Start date
- Status
So, children, let me help you out here. I keep showing you facts and you keep ignoring them and responding with non-sequiturs and/or ad hominem.
Here's what most on this board are thinking right now: "These lost low-info folk and their anti-constitution party have been practicing free speech suppression for over 4 years. So why would I think that voter suppression is where they draw the line?"
Gonna give you another chance to redeem yourself. What are the important FACTS expressed in this video? I'll give you help on the first one: it has something to do with Lois Lerner and the deep state.
A high ranking U.S. Senator has told a close friend that there is little doubt based on statistics that there was wide spread voter fraud in both Michigan and Pennsylvania. The problem is trying to prove it before the certification dates. He says there is little they can do but he's hopeful that time will shed some light on who did what. It will be too late for this election but MAYBE we can prevent this crapfest from happening in the future. Mail in voting HAS TO STOP unless you request an absentee ballot and then have to match a signature at the very least.
Confidence in our election results SHOULD be a priority for both parties. One thing that strikes me as funny. A young black Republican Senate candidate had a large lead pending counting in Detroit. He lost when the "black" vote went overwhelmingly to an old white liberal incumbent in Detroit? Really?
Georgia is doing a recount.
Demand recounts, by hand in WI, PA, MI, AZ, NV, and GA. Have 1-2 representatives for each party examine each ballot and approve or kick aside questionable ones for further review, PER EACH STATES WRITTEN LAWS, not what Jake Tapper and Chuck Todd think should happen. If Democrats suspect that the Trump camp cheated in any state, we're open to recounting those. Crickets.
Pelosi wants more mail in voting. Her bill makes the return envelope postage paid. I think she's even willing to check the boxes for you, but haven't confirmed that yet (sarcasm). Western, democratically run countries require ID to vote and severely limit voting by mail. It is so easy to cheat. I have no doubt they cheated on a large scale. 1) They stopped the counting to check the score (unheard of) and determine 'what it would take' 2) They dropped mail in ballots in the middle of the night (shady af) 3) The mail in ballots were 100% for Sleepy. In some places, the ballots were only marked for the presidency. All other races were left blank. Possible? Yes, but on an extremely small scale. 4) They broke laws by excluding partisan observers.
Demand recounts, by hand in WI, PA, MI, AZ, NV, and GA. Have 1-2 representatives for each party examine each ballot and approve or kick aside questionable ones for further review, PER EACH STATES WRITTEN LAWS, not what Jake Tapper and Chuck Todd think should happen. If Democrats suspect that the Trump camp cheated in any state, we're open to recounting those. Crickets.
It's like magic that Biden experienced a surge ONLY in the battleground states Trump was winning late on election day. Nothing suspicious about that.
In this video the billionaire-controlled group didn't say they were predicting what would happen in November. They tell the interviewer, THE KNOW, what will transpire with the election still months away?
How could they know it? And why does the left tell you that everything that revolves around Trump is a conspiracy? PROJECTION. The democrats are masters of the darkest, most anti-progress conspiracies.
They basically tell the world about their plans, in order to neuter the conspiracy label. How can it be a conspiracy when you tell everyone your plans to subvert the election. They dared the Republicans to stop them. And like they always do, the Republicans (i.e. John Roberts) proved to be their enablers and do nothing about the criminal confession you find in this video.
Last edited:
They are counting on the republicans being okay with the largest, most vile criminal conspiracy in American history.
At the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Franklin was queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation. In the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland’s delegates to the Convention, a lady asked Dr. Franklin “Well Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy.” Franklin replied, “A republic . . . if you can keep it.”
Dingle, I know you want to keep it. At least that's my hope. Everything in life that is freedom-related is special.
The USA and the dream of self-government, is worth fighting for. Stand up and stand by my friend.
Here's the first step; who was this US Senator? I don't care who your friend is, but the Senator is an elected official. Accordingly, there is no need to withhold that info.
Secondly, what is this Senator's proof or basis for this assertion?
That's the problem with all of this; we have unknown people having claims with no proof or evidence. Hell- there's someone in Nevada that is making allegations. Of course, the first place they went with their story was the Trump campaign, not county or state officials. Not to worry- they sent a copy of the affidavit to the State AG. Of course, it's kind of hard to investigate when the name is redacted, and there's no contact information----and this is the Fox News version of the story.
Lastly-- It could also be said that it's pretty suspicious that Biden was winning Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas, and then, later in the evening, Trump surged ahead. Seems just as fishy as anything that went on in any of the states Biden won.
I have seen nothing that would indicate that a Trump supporter is less likely to cheat than a Biden supporter, but yet that's what I'm apparently supposed to believe, and without any proof no less.
Dingle always has an anonymous source, high placed, or an expert.
His sources are gold, but the ones that are close to the President-reject who detailed his dishonesty and true feelings are fake.
This is what someone says when no evidence is presented in a court of law to substantiate a claim of wrongdoing.
Second hand innuendo .
"statistics" LMFAO
So if John James had won that race, and someone from the other tribe said Detroit voters must have supported him just because he is black, wouldn't you be squealing like a stuck pig?
How did James do in Detroit two years ago, when he lost to Debbie Stabenow? She carried Wayne County with more than 60% and Washtenaw County with more than 70%.
Last edited:
If he keeps it up long enough to divert these “legal fees” he may just pay off some serious debt.
John James lost to Debbie Stabenow 69.1% to 29% in Wayne County (Detroit) in the 2018 Senate election.
Suddenly, it looks like James might have legitimately lost to Gary Peters in 2020, doesn't it. For the record, it was 67.2% to 30.5% in Wayne County this time.
But we simultaneously must stop counting, keep counting and start recounting...despite margins that are far behind anything any recount has ever changed.
#PayDonnie’sDebts2020
Yeah but Stabenow is nine years older than Gary Peters and not nearly as much of a LIB!!!
Oh wait... that makes the original assertion even more dipshitted.
Right...how can you vote for Biden he built the racist system black people complain about.
moveon.org? That's key to how we arrived at the failed state we are in. If putting a thread on ignore is beyond you, you're not going to like what the future has in store.
You gotta calm down brother. Trump lost and it was all because he couldn't learn to STFU. In 2024 we will all have a chance to voice our opinion once again.
Failed state?
Wait a minute----
Trump has been president for the past 3 years and 10 months.
Republicans have the majority of governorships and state legislatures.
If we're in a failed state, then doesn't Trump and the GOP have some ownership of that?
No proof? You guys boarded up windows. Transparency, you've been against it figuratively and literally. Why do you think that is?
You really just played the "surrender" card as a persuasion point? I'm surprised you can't see the big picture here.
Multiple anti-Trump activists and commentators are signaling a coming broad-based effort to carry out punishment and retribution against Trump supporters and associates for what the activists claim are the irreparable harms that Trump's political movement has wrought upon the United States.
Interesting take, since there are Dem and GOP people watching the votes be counted, and yet somehow none of them have made any claims.
Your inane post also doesn't answer any of the questions I posted to Dingle regarding this US Senator.
While we're at it, are you ever gonna answer the questions I posed to you about the "failed state"?
ROTFLMAO.
So want to explain why you supported Jill Stein and her 3 state recount? Hypocrites. (smh)
Surrender? I haven't seen any concrete evidence that is going to sway the numbers he is down. I might have a different opinion if that was the case, but at no point in the last 8 days has any of that been shown.. I imagine in every election since the start of the USA there has been some sort of small scale fraud. We still have pretty archaic systems and until we can move forward to a lot better system there is always going to be this chance, but until I see some sort of concrete evidence of it happening vs. just people on the right side of the aisle crying foul play with no sense I am not going to go with that narrative. I'm not going to be like Stacey Abrams and claim a win in an election where I lost by 50,000+ votes.
"small scale"? 70 million unsolicited mail-in votes is small scale?
Come on man. I know you understand that the election protocols were violated. The constitution says the legislatures set the rules, not the executive and judicial branches.
TBH, you've seen dozens of threads in this same vein and this is the only one you want to silence? I think there is something else going on here and you're the last one I would've expected to fall into "that camp". (smh)
Has it ever occurred to you that people here would be every bit as tired of your endless gasbagging and tribal copy-and-paste fests if you were a self-important blowhard from the loony left?
Why I supported Jill Stein? WTF are you even talking about?
Why is the Trump admit celebrating AP calls in Alaska while simultaneously denying the AP calls for the election itself.
If Trump would have won, we wouldn't be hearing anything from you about those 70M votes. Like I said, I'm not happy Biden won, but until I see something much more concrete about how there was some sort of corruption I remain skeptical. I think for myself and tend to need facts to back up crazy claims.
He is going to have to overcome some pretty big numbers and I haven't seen anything yet:
WI - 20K Votes
MI - 146K
PA - 50K
AZ - 13K
NV - 36K
GA - 14K
Don't you know that the fact you haven't seen anything just shows how deep the corruption is?
True Republicans should be happy, the state level races broke pretty well in their favor, and despite predictions of the shifting electorate spelling their doom, they made inroads with voters that were expected to vote blue forever. Yes, Trump was defeated, but the Republican Party, which was signaled as dead, still has hope in a post Trump world.
There are plenty of Republicans that are garbage and need to be shown the door. Its been called the swamp for a reason.
Okay, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt you're not a Bloomberg with no core values who just jumps on the bandwagon of whoever the MSM anoints as prom king. But ask yourself this: Trump draws 20-40 thousand to every rally and Joe can't even get 100 people to show for his rally's
And then on election day Joe gets more votes than Obama got in 2008 and 2012? So in your mind Trump lost because of his mouth and those same people have no problem with a guy who is functionally illiterate as a result of being senile? That computes for you?
And BTW, I made my voice clear that mail-in voting (as opposed to absentee ballot) was a bad idea BEFORE the election, so you are factually wrong with your claim I was for it until Joe was declared the victor by a press which has stated point blank they would do anything to defeat DJT.
I'll know you're serious in your position if you comment on the post below. I am troubled you haven't clicked on the videos I've posted demonstrating there is clear and objective evidence supporting my position.
Last edited:
And there you have it, folks - cold, hard evidence of election fraud, because one candidate drew more people to his "rally's."
Call off the transition. The mouth-breathing goobers with way too much time on their hands have spoken.
Last edited:
- Status