Kentucky Got Screwed.

Dakota25

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2014
2,460
1,027
0
Those games were in November and December and as others have said, 5 games is not a decent sample size. Think about playing in the SEC or ACC. You have the really good teams and you have the bottom teams. But the bottom line is you have 18 conference games against P5 level competition when you are in the ACC or SEC. Sometimes you play well and get a quality win and other teams you stink it up against a bottom feeder that if an outsider looked just at those one or two or three games they may assume you are overrated.

Look at the Noles: We lost at Georgia Tech and at Pitt who are in the bottom of the ACC and lost at Syracuse who didn't make the field. We also lost to Temple on a Neutral floor in November and Temple has an RPI in the 100s. If you isolated those four games you would think we stink. At the same time the Noles won 13 games against teams that made the NCAA Tournament field. That is why it is a total body of work. Playing 5 games against P5 competition is not enough games to truly evaluate a team's level based only on those 5 games. You have to look at the total 35 game schedule. Wichita dominated their conference. Their opponents were overmatched. But it doesn't mean they aren't better than a lot of the Power 5 teams they might play in the NCAAT.
Good point but Wichita State didn't beat any good teams. Dayton is their best win and that was a back and forth down to the wire game.
 

Chuckinden

All-American
Jun 12, 2006
19,000
5,953
113
Wichita got screwed
We have some Calipari haters (The CLOD) that I'm sure are delighted with the draw. They are no doubt waiting to pounce on an early round exit and rip at Cal and the players. Of course they will dismiss any team that manages to beat us as pathetic just to make Kentucky look worse.

I expect them to be disappointed. I plan to laugh at them.
What was the purpose of making a post like that at this point and juncture? Just seems unuseful.
 

turkeywildturkey

All-Conference
Oct 23, 2003
2,647
2,202
0
First off, let me say that I expect Kentucky to advance tomorrow. Where I am saying Kentucky got screwed is because of Wichita State being a 10 seed. Kentucky shouldn't be having to play a team the caliber of Wichita State in the 2nd round. Wichita is a 4 or 5 seed level of a team. Basically Dayton got screwed and Kentucky got screwed. Once you get to the Sweet 16 seeds are thrown out the window and everything is fair game but a team like Wichita State being off seeded by 5 or 6 seeds affects everybody in their pod. That said, I still think Kentucky will win. But it won't be an easy game.

If they're not good enough to beat Wichita State, they don't deserve to be a number 2 seed anyway.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
What was the purpose of making a post like that at this point and juncture? Just seems unuseful.

You doubt it will happen if we lose? The KY haters abound. We have many in our own fan base. They have been vile this year.
 
Mar 23, 2012
23,493
6,068
0
The other 2 seeds are playing st Mary's, South Carolina, and Michigan. Who would you prefer?

The 1 seeds are playing Wisconsin, michigan state, northwestern, and Arkansas? Who would you prefer?

Seems to me we got one of the weaker 2nd round opponents for a top seed.
Northwestern would be my top choice followed by St. Mary's and Wichita State
 

Chuckinden

All-American
Jun 12, 2006
19,000
5,953
113
You doubt it will happen if we lose? The KY haters abound. We have many in our own fan base. They have been vile this year.
Oh, I'm sure fans will be upset over two straight early exits...I will too. If we are going to continue to play this OAD game and not have the results we have had before last year, then Cal will deserve some heat. However, you've lured me into discussing something that may not happen and for that I apologize.
 
Mar 23, 2012
23,493
6,068
0
Wichita St is rated higher than all of those above teams. Every single one of them.
So you legitimately think Wichita is a top 5 team because Pomeroy has them top 5? lol

You know who else is way overrated? Gonzaga is +2.5 points better than the second place team, UVA 10th, St. Mary's 14th.

Also way underrated, Kansas 9th, UCLA 18th, Arizona 20th. Pomeroy is a nice metric but it has it's faults, especially with mid major teams, and is hardly a clear cut indicator of overall strength.

For example, the rankings composite averages out 74 ranking systems. Wichita is only 18th on there.

Underseeded, yes, probably should have been a 7 based on resume, they didn't have the resume to deserve better, so pretty much irrelevant as we would have played a 7 if Dayton won.
 
May 27, 2007
31,937
25,074
113
So you legitimately think Wichita is a top 5 team because Pomeroy has them top 5? lol

You know who else is way overrated? Gonzaga is +2.5 points better than the second place team, UVA 10th, St. Mary's 14th.

Also way underrated, Kansas 9th, UCLA 18th, Arizona 20th. Pomeroy is a nice metric but it has it's faults, especially with mid major teams, and is hardly a clear cut indicator of overall strength.

For example, the rankings composite averages out 74 ranking systems. Wichita is only 18th on there.

Underseeded, yes, probably should have been a 7 based on resume, they didn't have the resume to deserve better, so pretty much irrelevant as we would have played a 7 if Dayton won.

No. And I don't think I ever said that I did think of them as top 5.

But like u said......take the full composite.......so 18th?

That's alot different than a 10 seed........or even a 7 seed. That suggests 4/5 seed. Much tougher than a second round game should be.
 

lennyd250cat

Sophomore
Apr 23, 2007
1,336
134
0
They have beaten NO ONE!! There schedule is horrible. They are Ole Miss of the SEC. It will be close for 30 minutes and we will win by 10-12pts at end. Got my tickets for Memphis.
 
Mar 23, 2012
23,493
6,068
0
No. And I don't think I ever said that I did think of them as top 5.

But like u said......take the full composite.......so 18th?

That's alot different than a 10 seed........or even a 7 seed. That suggests 4/5 seed. Much tougher than a second round game should be.
But they didn't have the resume to be a 4 or 5 seed. No ranking is going to change the fact that they beat nobody and had a **** schedule.
 
May 27, 2007
31,937
25,074
113
But they didn't have the resume to be a 4 or 5 seed. No ranking is going to change the fact that they beat nobody and had a **** schedule.

People arent upset at the seeding. Wichita St got what they deserved in terms of seeding.

Regardless of that, when the ball tips at 2:45 tomorrow, that's not going to matter. It's not going to change the fact that UK has to play a tougher opponent than they should as a 2 seed had the committee just used decent metrics.

I mean you have 74 computer systems on that massy composite rankings and they average 18th. That's way different than 10 seed. I think it at least needs to be looked into by the committee as there is obviously a huge gap with some of these mid majors.
 

Dore95

All-Conference
Mar 2, 2008
2,435
1,906
0
Wichita is 32 in the NCAA RPI. As others have said, no reason to overvalue kenpom.

Actually, I don't think too many UK fans are worried about this matchup. But it provides something else to complain about so the conspiracy theorists latch onto it.
 

Dakota25

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2014
2,460
1,027
0
Much better teams are usually bigger favorites than 3.

You might be underrating Wichita St a little bit.
Well I must have saw their worst five games this year. They just don't look as good as UK. UK beat mid majors as bad as Wichita did. Stephen F Austin, Duquesne, Cleveland State, Valpo, UT Martin, Canisius, and Hofstra are on the same level as the Missouri Valley teams that Wichita dominated.
 
May 27, 2007
31,937
25,074
113
Wichita is 32 in the NCAA RPI. As others have said, no reason to overvalue kenpom.

Actually, I don't think too many UK fans are worried about this matchup. But it provides something else to complain about so the conspiracy theorists latch onto it.

The RPI is pretty much one of the worst metrics available to rate a team.
 
Mar 23, 2012
23,493
6,068
0
People arent upset at the seeding. It's not going to change the fact that UK has to play a tougher opponent than they should as a 2 seed had the committee just used decent metrics.

I mean you have 74 computer systems on that massy composite rankings and they average 18th. That's way different than 10 seed. I think it at least needs to be looked into by the committee as there is obviously a huge gap with some of these mid majors.
Wichita didn't have the resume to deserve better than. The two sentences I have isolated at the top of the quote contradict each other.

And lastly, all the metric generally struggle with ranking mid-major teams who play weak schedules. That's why the standard deviation with Wichita's ranking on the composite is massive at 10.68. One ranking has them as high as 3, another has them as low s 47. No one else in the top 30 has a standard deviation about 8.68. You don't generally find that kind of standard deviation until you get to the bubble teams and the teams seeded 8 and below. Maryland was the only team with a standard deviation above 9 to get higher than an 8 seed, and it's pretty much universally recognized that Maryland was way overseeded.
 
May 27, 2007
31,937
25,074
113
Wichita didn't have the resume to deserve better than. The two sentences I have isolated at the top of the quote contradict each other.

And lastly, all the metric generally struggle with ranking mid-major teams who play weak schedules. That's why the standard deviation with Wichita's ranking on the composite is massive at 10.68. One ranking has them as high as 3, another has them as low s 47. No one else in the top 30 has a standard deviation about 8.68. You don't generally find that kind of standard deviation until you get to the bubble teams and the teams seeded 8 and below. Maryland was the only team with a standard deviation above 9 to get higher than an 8 seed, and it's pretty much universally recognized that Maryland was way overseeded.

Except they don't contradict at all.

The committee bases their seeding on resumes. Wichita St did not have a good one because they played no one. In my mock draft, I had Wichita St a 10 seed. Exactly what they ended up getting.

But Good/Bad resume doesn't always equate to good/bad team.

It's perfectly ok to say this team deserves X seed because they didn't have a good resume but they have the talent level that's better/worse than X seed.

They got a 10 based on resume. They have talent to suggest a 4/5 seed IMO.

You do get a wide standard deviation with them and your right. It shows that it's hard for people to judge how good this team really is. So what do you do in that circumstance. Wisdom of the crowds. Usually if you take the average, that's a pretty good estimator on where they are at.

IMO we are looking at a 15-20 ranked team. Not a 10. Not a 7. A 4/5.
 

tnttnt1959

Redshirt
Apr 12, 2008
288
1
0
Wichita State may be a 5 seed, but really? If Kentucky is not good enough to beat them
at this point, then we have a problem.

I am not happy with how strong the South region is, and that Ky has many tough games
to play, but this is March Madness, there are very few teams gonna lay down and let
us roll over them.

You have to win four games to get to the Final Four, so everyone quit whining about
the seeding and the tough region, Ky is certainly capable of getting there.
 

3Ringer

Freshman
Feb 1, 2011
539
79
0
We could get a bye into the Final Four and some fans would still think the committee screwed us if we faced the highest ranked team still alive. I have never understood this mentality.

If you want to win a Championship, you need to have the mindset that you can beat everyone in the field. If you just want an easy draw so you can watch us blow out our post-season opponents .... decline the NCAA invite and roll the dice in the NIT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tnttnt1959

CoachR35

Senior
Apr 1, 2007
4,046
431
0
The other 2 seeds are playing st Mary's, South Carolina, and Michigan. Who would you prefer?

The 1 seeds are playing Wisconsin, michigan state, northwestern, and Arkansas? Who would you prefer?

Seems to me we got one of the weaker 2nd round opponents for a top seed.
If you're going to win it all, you gotta be prepared to beat the best, regardless when you play them.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
The RPI is pretty much one of the worst metrics available to rate a team.
I do agree with this, but I also think people over-value kenpom on here. It's a pick and choose based on the narrative you're looking for. Out of one side of their mouths, some of our fans are saying, "Gonzaga is not a 1 seed...they are 8th in the rpi" and in the next breath, they are saying, "Wichita State is not a 10 seed...they are 5th in kenpom".

I agree that Wichita State is not a 10, but based on their schedule and just how terrible their conference was this year, I think they are more of a 7-8 than a 4-5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PokerCat72

Schwagg

All-American
Feb 4, 2003
2,729
5,127
0
Wichita State should have switched seeds with Minnesota. Wichita's losses would have probably been wins later in the season.
 

kevcat

Heisman
Feb 26, 2007
27,686
32,625
0
If we're as good as some of our blowhard fans think, we shouldn't have trouble beating anybody.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crpoore

Dakota25

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2014
2,460
1,027
0
If we're as good as some of our blowhard fans think, we shouldn't have trouble beating anybody.
Yeah just because I think we can beat a low mid major, not even a high mid major, but a low mid major team I have unrealistic expectations! Don't get me wrong Wichita State is the second best low mid major behind Gonzaga but I think UK should beat Gonzaga too.

Teams such as UCLA and UNC will be tough and I honestly think we have under a fifty percent chance of beating both, but maybe one will get upset.
 

Schwagg

All-American
Feb 4, 2003
2,729
5,127
0
Minnesota's wins over rummies like Rutgers, Nebraska, Illinois, etc aren't any different than Missour Valley wins. But the combination of good coaching & past tournament performance make WSU much more dangerous than teams with better seeds. When a team loses many quality players like WSU did, it takes time to get your rotation set & for team chemistry to be up to par.