Now Feinstupid says she doesn't know if it's true? It's a **** show perpetrated by Feinstein and the liberals. Putting a statement about somebody into the public domain that accuses a judge of a felony that can not be proved or unproved after 35 years.
I actually agree but for reasons we all know, some individuals argue and make ridiculous statements to every comment I make.
And who is at fault for that? All she has to do is go to the police and file the report. Right? It’s pretty clear what this is, Bru, and the opposition’s reaction to it is justified.
The fact she took a poly means jack and **** on its face. You have no idea what the questions were, you have no idea about anything related to it, you only know she took one and supposedly passed it. Wonder if she would submit to a bi-partisan list of questions in a poly?
Agree, The can of worms has been opened. Going silent now does her cause no good whatsoever.
I actually applaud Feinstein for that statement because it's truthful. She has no idea if the accusation is accurate or not. That's where the value of the testimony lies. Get it on record, and let the committee vote after hearing both sides. I think it's a fair way to move forward.
A drunk teenager isn't too likely to file a police report. A lot of folks live with traumas like this in their pasts and choose to stay quiet about them for various reasons. I think she could have a legitimate complaint, and it could simply be that the prospect of her alleged attacker rising to the Supreme Court finally made her decide to come forward. Without hearing both sides out, it's hard to decide what's real here, and it may still be difficult after hearing them out. Also, if she's legit, no matter what Kavanaugh has become since that day, to her he's still the guy who assaulted her.
Its not hard to see what is going on here. If she was legit this would have come up 10 years ago. Anyone dumb enough to fall for this is lost.
I watched her lawyer say she will cooperate with the committee in whatever way they want her to on air, “even if that means testifying without an investigation”. So, I don’t know where all the “if she doesn’t testify, she’s a liar” talk came from in the first place.
And the motivations come through at last.
Sure, this woman has built a very strong resume and career. To think that she's needs to be treated like a 6 year old is ridiculous. She's made the allegation almost 2 months ago, more than enough time to pull up her big girl panties, and she either comes to testify Monday or the committee should proceed as if there were was no claim.
Not sure what you have been watching but she is not going to testify Monday. She's built a very impressive resume over the years and to think she has to be treated like a 6 year old is making her an infant. She's not. She made these claims in a letter almost two months ago, the committee has granted her an audience this Monday and she is balking. Put your big girl panties on and back up your claim. If not, the committee should vote on the info in the record.
Is it not relevant to points being made in this thread?
Makes no difference it's accurate or not......the damage intent is done. And Feinstein should have been doing the investigating,they do it all the time, to determine it's validity.
No, it’s not relevant unless you just want to continue to whine about it. That seat has been filled.
I’d have to be a moron to think it’s above members of either political party or even the US Senate to use something like this as a despicable delay tactic. But allowing testimony in this situation, or just slowing the process to ensure something isn’t missed isn’t so horrible, imo.
Nothing is wrong unless there is something to hide. They simply don't want Kavenaugh to talk to the FBI on this subject. Just like they don't want Trump to talk to the Special Council on that investigation.
Then don’t act like you’re above the political football bs here......same as Garland.....it’s despicable on both sides of the 50.
I think you know me better than that......I have/do admit that I'm not. However I do like to shine the hypocrisy spotlight on others.
?