Kash Money
- Thread starter JohnHughsPartner
- Start date
Tag a TI’er that you think can NOT complete a standard pull-up. I’ll start @Larry_Williams
so on one hand it's unfair to have female do a pull up because men's physiology is different than females.On other hand it's ok to have mature males on female sports teams because .......
Correct.
Shot one of my shoulders obnoxiously doing push-ups a couple years ago.
These things are always a disaster.
Wild he would sit there and tell us that the bureau of prisons made the decision to move Maxwell to a club fed. But then Cory Booker's little monologue was embarrassing to me too. And just yelling over each. Every single clip I've seen is completely cringe.
Wild he would sit there and tell us that the bureau of prisons made the decision to move Maxwell to a club fed. But then Cory Booker's little monologue was embarrassing to me too. And just yelling over each. Every single clip I've seen is completely cringe.
He just tears Weasel Adam Schiff a new arsehole. Calls him out to his face. This is glorious.
"YOU ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUD TO EVER SIT IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE" - Amen
"YOU ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUD TO EVER SIT IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE" - Amen
You can literally see Schiff’s lip start quivering
dems: "women can't do pull ups."
dems: "biological men are not stronger than women and have no advantage in women's sports."
dems: "we don't know what a woman is."
Guy looks coked out of his mind at all times.
Show the Epstein files.
Show the Epstein files.
this is the first administration that I can recall that goes to Congress loaded for bear. Trumps appointees give as well as they take.
Did nobody catch the part where Kash Patel claimed Epstein didn't traffic the girls to anybody? Apparently the courts,all the pundits, everybody had it wrong, no sex trafficking at all.
I agree. Not good that the senate and senate hearings have gotten to this point but it is what it is. Glad that the admin's reps are pushing back.
TBH, that's why at the outset there was no direct popular election of senators. The founding fathers were skeptical of the easily swayed, emotional electorate and hoped that the senate, being appoopointed by the state legislatures to represent the state interest would be a more rational and measured than a house of representatives directly elected by popular vote. But then the states legislatures couldn't do their jobs and make sure that there were enough senators to keep a quorum and we got an amendment to the constitution.,
these h
I don't know how intelligent people can sit through these things
these hearings would be so much more worthwhile if the questions weren't totally slanted based on political bias. You just know that when Booker asks questions, he already knows the answer and is just attempting to be confrontational and create sound bites. And republicans aren't any better.
I don't know how intelligent people can sit through these things
I hope this creepy sycophantic ghoul gets the FAFO he deserves in court because I believe he perjured himself in the hearing today. He said he didn't fire the three agents suing for their unlawful dismissal because he was directed to, by saying they were fired for cause. The lawyer for these three exremely decent, long-serving career professionals says he will prove in court that Kash told them to their faces that he was directed by the White House to release them or he would be fired himself and no matter how hard he tries to skirt the truth, we all know he only serves one man and not the country he was sworn to protect. No way a jury would buy his words over theirs. Does he think everyone has forgotten all the despicable horseshit he shoveled on social media and Steve Bannon's show before he was appointed?
Booker is a walking 3 ring circus full of clowns with an attached freak show. He didnt ask questions in the clip. He made statements.
I don't know what the solution is. But im glad that the administration appointees are giving back when statements are made in the place of questions
Edit: damn auto-correct
Last edited:
I’ve been saying it for a while now, they are getting closer and closer to just saying Epstein didn’t do anything wrong
Ha. @dpic73 Looks like i've got me"ANEW" groupie following me. Had 'em before when I was younger . The female kind as in those with a vajayjay,lol.
These oversight hearings are frequently little more than dog and pony shows where both the people called to testify and the House members or Senators are up there pontificating and/or arguing with each other. But they nonetheless serve a useful purpose, IMHO. Executive branch heads need to be able to articulate a defense of their policies and their motives, and the House members and Senators need to demonstrate that they have a grasp of the subject matter. Sometimes, interesting facts are brought to light. Today's exchanges between Booker and Patel, and Schiff and Patel, were somewhat painful to watch but, notwithstanding the partisan disagreements, they highlighted policy differences for those tuning in (especially those who are not steeped in all of this stuff), and are to some extent educational.
I used to do this kind of work...here's how the process functioned...I would get the proposed questions from the committee's professional staff... I went to my principal and gave him the question, his staff gave me the proposed response...I took response back to the committee staff and this process went on to a point where my priniciipal agreed to the question and the committee agreed with the response. That way no one was embarrassed.
Things seem to have changed, but hearing are still just as mundane and boring
Hilarious. You know its heated when Vanilla Oatmeal Milquetoast Grassley gets mad and is telling them to shut up. 1:28 bang bang "Both of you be quiet." LOL.
Last edited:
Didn't catch it because its not true. I am new here, I find you obtuse and mendacious. Not that you will care but you will be put on ignore for your lack of candor.
From transcript
" NOW, I AM NOT
3:14
SAYING THAT OTHERS WERE NOT
3:15
TRAFFICKED AND OTHERS WERE NOT
3:18
INVOLVED. WHAT I AM TELLING YOU
3:19
IS THAT BASED ON THE
3:21
INFORMATION WE HAVE AND WE HAVE
3:22
CONTINUOUSLY, PUBLICLY ASKED
3:24
FOR THE PUBLIC TO COME FORWARD
3:25
WITH MORE INFORMATION. IF THERE
3:27
IS, WE'LL LOOK AT IT. BUT BASED
3:29
ON CREDIBLE INFORMATION, WE
3:30
HAVE RELEASED ALL CREDIBLE
3:31
INFORMATION AND THE INFORMATION
3:32
THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
3:34
AND THE FBI NEVER RELEASES IS
3:36
INFORMATION ON INVESTIGATIONS
3:38
THAT ARE NOT CREDIBLE, AND WE
3:40
DON'T RELEASE THE NAMES OF
3:41
VICTIMS WHO WEREN'T CREDIBLE.
3:42
BUT AT THE SAME TIME, WE DON'T
3:44
RELEASE THE NAMES OF VICTIMS
3:45
WHO WERE CREDIBLE. AND SO THE
3:47
INFORMATION THAT'S BY LAW. AND
3:49
SO THE INFORMATION WE ARE
3:50
RELEASING NOW IS HISTORIC, AND
3:52
IT IS ALSO TO THE MAXIMUM
3:53
CAPACITY THAT THE LAW ALLOWS."
He is saying that they have no proof that there was trafficking. Why then was Maxwell in prison?
Do you truly believe that the FBI has no proof of trafficking?
And ignore? Why, because you don't like a differing opinion?
She was directly involved in getting girls for Epstein. The only thing provable at this point.
I do not know. I feel strongly that others were involved. I mean the letch Clinton surely was checking the oil. I cant prove it.
But read what Kash said. Now he could be lying or not. But what you said was false. You said "Did nobody catch the part where Kash Patel claimed Epstein didn't traffic the girls to anybody?" He said he lacked evidence, not that it did not happen.
Like I said he could be lying.
Nope because you are either obtuse, mendacious or both. I have only been following this site for a few weeks after the on3 merger canceled the site I frequented and put another behind a paywall.
Obviously I have not put you on ignore yet.
I am waiting (probably in vain) to see if you retract your statement.
She was directly involved in getting girls for Epstein. The only thing provable at this point.
I do not know. I feel strongly that others were involved. I mean the letch Clinton surely was checking the oil. I cant prove it.
But read what Kash said. Now he could be lying or not. But what you said was false. You said "Did nobody catch the part where Kash Patel claimed Epstein didn't traffic the girls to anybody?" He said he lacked evidence, not that it did not happen.
Like I said he could be lying.
Nope because you are either obtuse, mendacious or both. I have only been following this site for a few weeks after the on3 merger canceled the site I frequented and put another behind a paywall.
Obviously I have not put you on ignore yet.
I am waiting (probably in vain) to see if you retract your statement.
I will retract that I claimed he said that Epstein never trafficked girls... I assumed anyone who watched the video would understand I was being satirical. That said, it sure doesn't seem that he's being completely honest.
Natural born grifter mentored by Fred Trump, Norman Vincent Peal and Roy Cohn
Epstein trafficked by arranging for the victims to serve his acquaintances in both the US and foreign locations
10 unnamed sources? Wow is that a record? I do agree that they ran on exposing Epstein's clients and can't or won't do it. Its like a fart that lingers.
BTW I also have a lazy eye.
Schiff is the idiot. He is a moron that could only be elected in Cali or NY. Should I mention that he is bug eyed?
GOP shuts down House Democrats' effort to subpoena banks handling Jeffrey Epstein money
Rep. Jamie Raskin wanted to subpoena four banks he says flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious financial transactions linked to the disgraced financier.
www.usatoday.com
Satire and mendacious are not synonyms
See this is an honest opinion. I can respect that. And I will admit that it is not an unreasonable opinion.
30K pages? Is the font set to 144? There is no way he or anyone else has read all of it.
I appreciate your respect I guess?
Now I fully expect for you to call out the lack of mendaciousness by the other psited on this board.
I am a nobody. LOL
I am lazy and rarely bother checking up on others sources. Especially statistics from some unknown think tanks most of whom lean left.
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics" - supposedly Twain
Rules of thumb:
Liberal = half truth
Leftist = outright lies
Right = does it pass the smell test, if not make sure its not from Alex Jones or other conspiracy nuts.
I am to the right. I have seen one poster from my side who constantly gets historical facts wrong. I am tempted to correct but its akin to policing grammar or spelling.
The clip was short or I probably would not have watched it. I watch youtubes on 2x. They seem to be getting longer and longer much to my disappointment. But you can fit in more commercials for longer vids.
I use the Brave browser and thankfully it blocks them.