Just got a text

[Strike.sixpack]

I don't think they have a tape like that. If they did, we would have heard about it by now.

But those of you who think immunity protects Leo and us if they do are wrong. Immunity is for the player only, not the school, and it applies only to things he told them (and there is no way he mentioned taking money from us) and it only applies to things he told them TSUN did. If they can show that he took money from us, immunity means nothing.

That is why Saban told his players not to say a word, and why we should have, too. If he told them LSU or Alabama offered him money, he has no immunity for that, either, another thing I hear McCreedy is saying.

I am sure it is all ******** during the Egg Bowl week, but if true, we are not in the clear by any means.

Immunity is for the player only. But the NCAA can only ask questions about UM investigation and the players knowledge to confirm information they already have on UM. They never give immunity to find out something. It is to collaborate information they have already obtained elsewhere. And all of this questioning is done with the school's lawyers and athletic department present. There is not one question that will be asked or allowed to be asked that pertains to our recruitment of the player.

Let me know how much probation Tennessee got for the Albert Means case when immunity was given. Fulmer was so deep in that mess he even had to testify in the Grand Jury for the Logan Young trial.

 

[MaroonNation]

I don't post much, but you know the old saying "people who know, don't post. People who post, don't know"

Here's the giveaway. Usually he takes this opportunity to state " I've been hearing this for two weeks
Before you" to always one up any "insider". This is close enough.

 

[AlCoDog]

Explosivo.

 

[tatedog]

Well said.

 

[Drebin]

Here's the giveaway. Usually he takes this opportunity to state " I've been hearing this for two weeks
Before you" to always one up any "insider". This is close enough.

The "I've been here longer than you" comment is a pretty good giveaway, too.

 

[tatedog]

He's the most informed idiot on the internet, yet he has the restraint to only post his most accurate ********. We should be more grateful.

 

[HunterDawg]

Chuck is too busy scouring Youtube for secret videos to post on SPS. I give the man credit for somehow ballooning their hopes for a few days before a mighty, mighty fall.

Don't take my word for it. Do a little research on how the immunity thing works. It is a trap and a terrible idea. Nobody else even thought about giving them anything. Too dangerous.

If nothing else, it leads to the conclusion that he turned down a bunch of money to come play here for free, even with his momma demanding money from everybody in sight. Not a good image for anyone. No reason to expose ourselves to that. Bad decision on Dan's part.

 

[tatedog]

You don't have a 17ing clue what anybody gave to anybody. You can't even carry on a successful 2nd internet persona.

 

[patdog]

The NCAA didn't spend any time or money investigating Cam. This is nothing even remotely like the Cam situation.

 

[HunterDawg]

You don't have a 17ing clue what anybody gave to anybody. You can't even carry on a successful 2nd internet persona.

I am addressing one, and only one, point and that is the position that even if they can prove we paid Leo, they can't touch us because of the immunity deal. That is simply not true. All the immunity thing does is protect Leo's eligibility for things done in Oxford. That is the end of it. It, in no way, protects us, or him, if he admitted that we paid him.

Like I said, it is all Eggbowl week ********, but it is not a laughing matter, if true.

 

[tatedog]

Then go cry yourself to sleep.

 

[HunterDawg]

Immunity is for the player only. But the NCAA can only ask questions about UM investigation and the players knowledge to confirm information they already have on UM. They never give immunity to find out something. It is to collaborate information they have already obtained elsewhere. And all of this questioning is done with the school's lawyers and athletic department present. There is not one question that will be asked or allowed to be asked that pertains to our recruitment of the player.

Let me know how much probation Tennessee got for the Albert Means case when immunity was given. Fulmer was so deep in that mess he even had to testify in the Grand Jury for the Logan Young trial.

Exactly. The immunity thing has nothing whatsoever to do with him taking money from another school. If he did, he can't use the immunity for that, and whoever paid him can't either. It is a very limited and restricted deal. So limited that no one should ever take that bait, and we shouldn't have, either.

 

[HunterDawg]

Now I remember why I don't post on this board. No matter how true, if something upsets the sunshine pumpers, they go ballistic.

Not one person has said, "you know, he is right" even though a lot of you know it is correct. Immunity will not protect us in this situation.

Carry on. See y'all in another couple of years.

 

[L4Dawg]

Don't take my word for it. Do a little research on how the immunity thing works. It is a trap and a terrible idea. Nobody else even thought about giving them anything. Too dangerous.

If nothing else, it leads to the conclusion that he turned down a bunch of money to come play here for free, even with his momma demanding money from everybody in sight. Not a good image for anyone. No reason to expose ourselves to that. Bad decision on Dan's part.

Keep telling yourself he was the only one and we were the only school. Here is a clue: WE AIN'T and HE AIN'T. YOUR problems did not originate with us. Heck we have been turning you in for years, nobody gave a damn. You went and pissed off the wrong people this time. You don't have half the current top 4 and at least 3 of the top 5 programs of all time after your butt and you not go down. That y'all made it easy for the NCAA didn't help your case.

 

[Strike.sixpack]

Exactly. The immunity thing has nothing whatsoever to do with him taking money from another school. If he did, he can't use the immunity for that, and whoever paid him can't either. It is a very limited and restricted deal. So limited that no one should ever take that bait, and we shouldn't have, either.

I agree but no player who has received immunity has had issues from it at a later date. Also the bylaw is very basic. It states that immunity can’t apply to an employee’s involvement of unreported NCAA violations, future involvement in violations, or any action taken by a university. It says nothing about a past infraction of the student athlete. Also I disagree completely with your thought that it is some sort of trap. Immunity is given in about 25% of all NOA and it is granted to the investigative staff by the COI. They have to be told why they want it and what they are trying to collaborate using immunity.

 

[tatedog]

Of course it's a trap. I mean that's what you do to promote honesty in future interviews. You throw people you gave immunity to under the bus!

 

[ShrubDog]

Don't take my word for it. Do a little research on how the immunity thing works. It is a trap and a terrible idea. Nobody else even thought about giving them anything. Too dangerous.

If nothing else, it leads to the conclusion that he turned down a bunch of money to come play here for free, even with his momma demanding money from everybody in sight. Not a good image for anyone. No reason to expose ourselves to that. Bad decision on Dan's part.

Its a trap, dangerous,exposure and a bad decision on Dan's part.

The only bad image is the one OM is portraying. And Dan has nothing to do with this, you are thinking of Freeze.

 

[TBone.sixpack]

You will be missed**

 

[aTotal360]

Thanks for the warning.

 

[Drebin]

I am addressing one, and only one, point and that is the position that even if they can prove we paid Leo, they can't touch us because of the immunity deal. That is simply not true. All the immunity thing does is protect Leo's eligibility for things done in Oxford. That is the end of it. It, in no way, protects us, or him, if he admitted that we paid him.

Like I said, it is all Eggbowl week ********, but it is not a laughing matter, if true.

You're an idiot. You don't have a clue .....no idea what you're talking about.

 

[tatedog]

Now I remember why I don't post on this board. No matter how true, if something upsets the sunshine pumpers, they go ballistic.

Not one person has said, "you know, he is right" even though a lot of you know it is correct. Immunity will not protect us in this situation.

Carry on. See y'all in another couple of years.

But you just said you don't post much because people in the know don't post. Change your mind already? It's amazing how you transformed from mic dropping truth teller to guy who argues with the local idiots only to high tail when somebody hurts his feelings.

 

[Spiderman.sixpack]

Ole Chuck has the goods to bring us down. He has the audio.

I try to be better than this, but I really hope Chuck and John Morgan die a horrible gagging death in a double choking off a homo 69 that went wrong.

 

[tatedog]

I try to be better than this, but I really hope Chuck and John Morgan die a horrible gagging death in a double choking off a homo 69 that went wrong.

You are only posting what we all are thinking.--not that there is anything wrong with that.

 

[thf24]

Don't take my word for it. Do a little research on how the immunity thing works. It is a trap and a terrible idea. Nobody else even thought about giving them anything. Too dangerous.

If nothing else, it leads to the conclusion that he turned down a bunch of money to come play here for free, even with his momma demanding money from everybody in sight. Not a good image for anyone. No reason to expose ourselves to that. Bad decision on Dan's part.

If you'd done any research yourself, you'd realize that the NCAA does not offer immunity in order to find new information; only to corroborate information they already have. We are not under investigation, therefore the NCAA is not interested in us; they were asking questions about Ole Miss and Ole Miss only, pertaining to information they already knew. The only way we could possibly get in trouble is if Leo was stupid enough to volunteer information about us (almost non-existent chance), and even then, it's very doubtful the NCAA would then move to open an investigation on us voluntary admissions of a single player when they're already in the thick of the deepest known cheating ring in college sports history. In other words, there is absolutely nothing for us to worry about. Quite the opposite of you guys up in Oxford.

 

[messageboardsuperhero]

Exactly. The immunity thing has nothing whatsoever to do with him taking money from another school. If he did, he can't use the immunity for that, and whoever paid him can't either. It is a very limited and restricted deal. So limited that no one should ever take that bait, and we shouldn't have, either.

No one should ever take that bait?? Do you really think that the NCAA's intention with this immunity stuff is to bait the other school they are not investigating into getting themselves in trouble? You do realize that Auburn and Alabama both had players (possibly more than one) interview with the NCAA for immunity too- at least according the Forde article. That seems to be the lost point in this whole BS narrative... Leo Lewis is far from the only person who has talked to the NCAA with immunity, he's just the easy target for the UM media shills because he plays for MSU.

(And I know that Forde never explicitly said Alabama, but when it came out, EVERYONE was 99% sure that the other school was Bama.)

 

[Lawdawg.sixpack]

I'm disappointed no one has replied with the Curly Bill gif yet...

 

[tatedog]

Bama had at least one player testify with NO immunity deal. Why would they balk at players testifying with immunity? As a matter of fact, he testified and was punished for what he told them.

 

[gymdawg.sixpack]

Felicia?

 

[Dogariffic]

Leo is in the clear. He did not know his momma was shopping him around. Cam told me, so it must be true ***

 

[IBleedMaroonDawg]

Now I remember why I don't post on this board. No matter how true, if something upsets the sunshine pumpers, they go ballistic.

Not one person has said, "you know, he is right" even though a lot of you know it is correct. Immunity will not protect us in this situation.

Carry on. See y'all in another couple of years.

Ok... is it sunshine pumpers, apologists or sheep. Gotta keep it straight which crowd you are talking about.

 

[squirldawg]

No one even knows the questions that were asked of Leo Lewis by the NCAA. NCAA could have recovered a burner phone that had Leo Lewis's number on it. Could have asked him who gave him a burner phone. No one knows if the questions were around pay for play or simply around evidence the NCAA has already found, which seems like what the immunity is normally used for in these cases. Regardless the Leo Lewis tape is another lie in a series of outright lies by the Ole Miss media.

 

[tatedog]

No one even knows the questions that were asked of Leo Lewis by the NCAA. NCAA could have recovered a burner phone that had Leo Lewis's number on it. Could have asked him who gave him a burner phone. No one knows if the questions were around pay for play or simply around evidence the NCAA has already found, which seems like what the immunity is normally used for in these cases. Regardless the Leo Lewis tape is another lie in a series of outright lies by the Ole Miss media.

Why wouldn't Yancy, Chuck, Neal, et al know? Hell they know what's on Barney's phone and the burner phones. All this despite the fact they din' kno' nuffin' about anything but women's bball and track til mid spring.