JMike

Simce91

All-Conference
Dec 2, 2024
1,482
2,012
113
He's the reason why we won yesterday. If you don't want this kid back next year, your clueless. That said, he's going to need to be reasonable about what's fair compensation.
Agree,

I also think JMike will see the long term benefit of staying/graduating from RU
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUgal and LeapinLou

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,078
12,419
78
He's the reason why we won yesterday. If you don't want this kid back next year, your clueless. That said, he's going to need to be reasonable about what's fair compensation.

Since it seems like it’s already decided that Lino is leaving, it appears we’d be pretty much set at point if we kept TF and J Mike. If they have to play together 15 or so mpg it’s not a disaster. Playing 2 small guards at a time is far from the biggest issue with this team, if fact, I’m not sure that specific thing has cost us much at all. When we’ve had to play all 3 small guards together to press - that’s been a bigger issue once the press is broken.

Buchanan is the only front court piece worth prioritizing and his natural position is really the 3. I would still keep both Ogbole and Dortch if they are cheap enough because I don’t think targeting back up bigs should be a priority either.

We need for someone not currently on the roster to start at both the 4 or 5 (I’m willing to slot Buchanan in at the 3 for 22ish planned minutes).

we still have Michigan state and possibly a one and done game against a good BIg team in the tourney to potentially get blown out in to ensure Dylan Grant collects enough garbage time baskets to stay a double digit scorer. There will be A-10 teams out there willing to pay someone like him way more than he’d be worth to us IMO to be their main guy.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,078
12,419
78
DG is unacceptable there, JMike was attacking the boards
Our 3 smallest players combined for 12 of 26 team rebounds. That’s ridiculous.

Buchanan had 7. The rest of the team combined for 7 rebounds and that included 2 “team” rebounds. So actually 5.

And to your point - yeah - J Mike crashes the boards and his role is to stay back to receive the pass on a rebound to bring the ball up. Either Lino or TF generally have the role of leaking out in the hope of a transition opportunity before the D gets set. Which makes the data even more astounding.
 
Last edited:

G- RUnit

All-American
Sep 13, 2004
14,371
7,973
113
His best game at RU IMHO.
His improvement at foul shooting is very nice to see.
Think he may be better coming off the bench.
Defense was very good and thankfully no matador D.

“Much Maligned.” There were too many games where he disappeared and did absolutely nothing. Simpson was crucified with better numbers and was driven out of town, so not sure if much maligned is entirely accurate.

Deserves credit for very nice game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1751334187

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,078
12,419
78
His best game at RU IMHO.
His improvement at foul shooting is very nice to see.
Think he may be better coming off the bench.
Defense was very good and thankfully no matador D.

“Much Maligned.” There were too many games where he disappeared and did absolutely nothing. Simpson was crucified with better numbers and was driven out of town, so not sure if much maligned is entirely accurate.

Deserves credit for very nice game.

Huh? What does Simpson have to do with where we are right now. you don’t go from what Simpson was to backing up Dylan Harper. Simpson clearly didn’t want that role so it was a mutual decision. I don’t get your comparison. Davis was friends with Ace and wanted to stay to be the back up PG. It’s apples and oranges really.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,638
38,120
113
Since it seems like it’s already decided that Lino is leaving, it appears we’d be pretty much set at point if we kept TF and J Mike. If they have to play together 15 or so mpg it’s not a disaster. Playing 2 small guards at a time is far from the biggest issue with this team, if fact, I’m not sure that specific thing has cost us much at all. When we’ve had to play all 3 small guards together to press - that’s been a bigger issue once the press is broken.

Buchanan is the only front court piece worth prioritizing and his natural position is really the 3. I would still keep both Ogbole and Dortch if they are cheap enough because I don’t think targeting back up bigs should be a priority either.

We need for someone not currently on the roster to start at both the 4 or 5 (I’m willing to slot Buchanan in at the 3 for 22ish planned minutes).

we still have Michigan state and possibly a one and done game against a good BIg team in the tourney to potentially get blown out in to ensure Dylan Grant collects enough garbage time baskets to stay a double digit scorer. There will be A-10 teams out there willing to pay someone like him way more than he’d be worth to us IMO to be their main guy.

Do you think that changes - he’s playing a lot better and has been rewarded with PT as a result?
 

G- RUnit

All-American
Sep 13, 2004
14,371
7,973
113
Simpson was a 6th man at St. Joes last year no? So the idea that he wouldn’t have played behind Harper rings hollow as does the lol, “mutual decision”.

In any event my commentary was addressed to “much maligned” and not apples or oranges at all. If JMD is much maligned, then what the heck was Simpson who was far more maligned. Think if anything JMD had gotten a relative free pass as there were many games he completely disappeared. That’s what has to do with right now.

In any event, I thought JMD had his best game at RU. Great to see improvement at the line, hustle, steals and rebounds. (All the stuff Simpson did well ;-)).

Funny when we don’t turnover the ball we have a shot.(No pun intended).

Maybe coming off the bench is a better role for him.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,078
12,419
78
Do you think that changes - he’s playing a lot better and has been rewarded with PT as a result?

With Lino? My guess (though I really have no idea) is probably not. In his case, the “money” consideration will probably be more forward looking ahead to potential for his junior season. Just think there will be more uncertainty around what his sophomore statistics would look like returning to RU vs going to a MWC or that level and putting up pretty looking stats where he earns a large check as a junior.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,078
12,419
78
Simpson was a 6th man at St. Joes last year no? So the idea that he wouldn’t have played behind Harper rings hollow as does the lol, “mutual decision”.

In any event my commentary was addressed to “much maligned” and not apples or oranges at all. If JMD is much maligned, then what the heck was Simpson who was far more maligned. Think if anything JMD had gotten a relative free pass as there were many games he completely disappeared. That’s what has to do with right now.

In any event, I thought JMD had his best game at RU. Great to see improvement at the line, hustle, steals and rebounds. (All the stuff Simpson did well ;-)).

Funny when we don’t turnover the ball we have a shot.(No pun intended).

Maybe coming off the bench is a better role for him.
Do you think he thought he was going there to be a 6 man? Come on. He started at RU and thought he’d be the main guy in the A-10. Who are you kidding with that one. Stop.

Besides which he played 30 mpg at St Joes as a junior despite coming off the bench and attempted almost as many shots as he did at RU that season. He was not going to be playing close to that at RU and both sides knew it.
 

RU-ROCS

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
12,405
7,571
113
Very nice game for the much maligned Davis - 4-8 from the field and 4-5 from the line for 12 points, 3 steals and 6 rebounds (second on the team). He also drew 2 key offensive fouls in the last 5 minutes when things got close. We don't win without him.
I agree. I thought he was the MVP of yesterday's game.
 

seansherm

Heisman
Feb 20, 2009
13,981
14,906
113
Our 3 smallest players combined for 12 of 26 team rebounds. That’s ridiculous.

Buchanan had 7. The rest of the team combined for 7 rebounds and that included 2 “team” rebounds. So actually 5.

And to your point - yeah - J Mike crashes the boards and his role is to stay back to receive the pass on a rebound to bring the ball up. Either Lino or TF generally have the role of leaking out in the hope of a transition opportunity before the D gets set. Which makes the data even more astounding.
So many things factored into those numbers. For EO, seemed like much of his time out there UMD barely took shots because they were turning it over. He again also took himself out of a few plays by staying on the pick and roll. I'd love to know if they tell him to hedge and stay rather than hedge and retreat to his man. The announcers made it seem like it's planned. Dortch just isn't physical enough. I really don't know what Grants issue is. I don't want to say he wasn't mixing it up, because I think he had a few blocks. Weird game.
 

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,372
6,304
113
I never understood the hate that Davis gets from SOME on here.

Yeah. He’s limited. Not the best player in the world. We know.

but he plays hard and really plays within himself.

His freshman year he would force things - a LOT - but you don’t see him doing that much at all anymore. So he’s improved his game in that way dramatically AND has improved his FTs.

. Having a steady upperclassman guard (assuming reasonable $) is a no brainer imho

regarding Simpson - his game at RU was different - he was MUCH more of a high volume shooter - not going to revisit history - but any comparison to the situation with Simpson from several years ago to Davis now is apples-oranges
 

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,401
4,777
113
Our 3 smallest players combined for 12 of 26 team rebounds. That’s ridiculous.

Buchanan had 7. The rest of the team combined for 7 rebounds and that included 2 “team” rebounds. So actually 5.

And to your point - yeah - J Mike crashes the boards and his role is to stay back to receive the pass on a rebound to bring the ball up. Either Lino or TF generally have the role of leaking out in the hope of a transition opportunity before the D gets set. Which makes the data even more astounding.

Our 3 smallest players combined for 12 of 26 team rebounds. That’s ridiculous.

Buchanan had 7. The rest of the team combined for 7 rebounds and that included 2 “team” rebounds. So actually 5.

And to your point - yeah - J Mike crashes the boards and his role is to stay back to receive the pass on a rebound to bring the ball up. Either Lino or TF generally have the role of leaking out in the hope of a transition opportunity before the D gets set. Which makes the data even more astounding.
Watch Buchanon' - after he he gets a defensive rebound he almost never outlets it to a guard. He almost always takes it by itself. That slows down the break - one of my 100 problems with the staff.
 

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,601
3,129
113
He's the reason why we won yesterday. If you don't want this kid back next year, your clueless. That said, he's going to need to be reasonable about what's fair compensation.
Agree on compensation and he can’t necessarily expect to start
 

RUBubba

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2002
4,941
2,612
113
I hope JMike does stay next year. Having that consistency is a big plus. He really would be a "loyal son".
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUgal

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,415
7,677
113
Very nice game for the much maligned Davis - 4-8 from the field and 4-5 from the line for 12 points, 3 steals and 6 rebounds (second on the team). He also drew 2 key offensive fouls in the last 5 minutes when things got close. We don't win without him.
JMike did some things he hasn’t done in almost any other game this year . He defended Cout , stole the ball and converted , took a great charge at the end and was a pest and caused Lopino to push off for another offensive foul. He hasn’t been that disruptive all year. Plus he got 6 rebounds including skying for one among 5 bodies when we seemed allergic to get a rebound. Guards have to rebound and he finally did the correct thing .
Now this is the issue , next game consistency. . He has had maybe 7 or so decent to good games but 22 others where he made no impact offensively ,defensively or setting us up. Next game Jeremy Fears so when he comes off the bench for Lino let him get in his grill , force them to start their offense further away from the hoop , pick pocket him , draw a charge and help on the defensive glass because they are big. Let’s see it. He is a junior. He knows the system and knows Michigan State . The last game turned when Fears started driving past him and others last game. That cannot happen . He stops Fears from getting into his drives that is a huge win . Let’s see it.
 

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,659
3,048
66
Said it a few weeks back. Jmike has gotten too much negativity. He's a bona fide B10 player.

Not a starting pg on a good B10 team, but like last night, he can a give a spark off the bench in B10 play. He has a place on next years team for many reasons
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeapinLou

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,415
7,677
113
Said it a few weeks back. Jmike has gotten too much negativity. He's a bona fide B10 player.

Not a starting pg on a good B10 team, but like last night, he can a give a spark off the bench in B10 play. He has a place on next years team for many reasons
You impact 7 of 29 games. That is a player you think is indispensable ? So many games he was in position to impact the game with a lot of minutes and did not . I like him as a person as a Rutgers guy but in 3 years his improvement if any if very very slight.
 

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,659
3,048
66
Back up pg needs to be there for stability and giving the team energy.

Using "indispensable" as the standard is just creating the test and result sought.

There's really no one indispensable on this team.

Is he a serviceable back up pg who has impacted some games for the good like yesterday-absolutely.
 

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,008
12,811
113
Back up pg needs to be there for stability and giving the team energy.

Using "indispensable" as the standard is just creating the test and result sought.

There's really no one indispensable on this team.

Is he a serviceable back up pg who has impacted some games for the good like yesterday-absolutely.

Since we are all knee deep in roster construction for next season, this leads to the obvious question

1. Backup PG to who: Francis? Mark? Powers? Transfer?
2. If he is the backup PG - what about the rest of those players? What are their roles (and as importantly their $$?)