Jerry Palm

Kingslayer07

Heisman
Jan 23, 2020
8,525
10,392
113
His updated bracket has us as 5!! LOLOL..cant stand that guy...doesn't make sense whatsoever. Wish I had Twitter to call him out
 
  • Like
Reactions: akaukswoosh

caneintally

Heisman
Oct 1, 2002
27,455
17,056
0
LOL there is no logic whereas the 10th ranked team should be a 5 seed. Hell the logic for a 4 seed is iffy and completely bogus if we win on Tuesday but a 5 seed? Palm is showing his bias so bad. What is funny is we were the 1st 5 when the committee came out and after all that has taken place no one can have us a 5 still logically . But Palm doesnt use logic.
 

jgraf1

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2006
2,050
2,616
113
Louisville still a 2? Wuff....

That's one that doesn't make any sense. 2 straight losses to bad teams and hardly penalized!

It's also funny to me that literally every bracket i've seen has SDSU as the 1 in the east with Duke as the 2. This is seemingly already set in stone for Duke to get a cake walk with a potentially overrated SDSU in the elite 8 for a home game for Duke in the garden. So much for preferential treatment as a 1 seed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf and gharding07

senonesy

All-American
Nov 30, 2017
4,062
8,222
113
I’m telling you guys committee with put a royal screw job on UK this year due to Evansville and Utah losses. The computer’s do not like UK (whether it is justifiable or not). I have never thought UK got bad treatment like some do in the past. This board will explode after selection Sunday this year. It is coming. If they lose couple a more, 6 or 7 seed will not be out of the question.
 

caneintally

Heisman
Oct 1, 2002
27,455
17,056
0
I’m telling you guys committee with put a royal screw job on UK this year due to Evansville and Utah losses. The computer’s do not like UK (whether it is justifiable or not). I have never thought UK got bad treatment like some do in the past. This board will explode after selection Sunday this year. It is coming. If they lose couple a more, 6 or 7 seed will not be out of the question.
No that is the beauty of the early look we got 2 weeks ago . They no longer can do that ( and haven't since they have been releasing the early look) . Now that doesn't mean when we deserve the 2nd seed they end up giving us the 1st 3 seed. But its not like if we win out they can do much but give us a top 10 seed. The committee hasn't screwed UK in terms of seed in 4-5 years . Which isn't a surprise they started giving those early looks 3-4 years ago. Everyone we are around in the 2-3 seed area ( like Penn St , like UL ) has bad losses like that

Again by screwed I mean we deserve a 2 and get a 4-5 . Deserving a low 2 and getting as high 3 isn't being screwed . The difference is so slim.
 

RalphDaltonFan

Heisman
Apr 3, 2002
60,136
41,429
113
Palm is a Purdue fan/Big 10 guy. I'd speculate if UK finishes strong with the 6 remaining games, they'll move up to where some of you want. I honestly don't care about Mock Brackets and in this year, this will be a scary 1st Round game for whomever this year's team plays. Just glad they have no chance of being a 1 because if UK/Cal team was to ever lose in opening round, it would be this year's team against a 16 with their approach to games. Giving away halves of basketball is begging to get beat. To this point, this year's team has shown they are a Sweet 16 caliber without bracket opening up, and peak game will be 2nd round if they can get by the 1st. Hope they grow and improve, but at no point has this team shown they can be trusted to build off a victory. Got their chance to show it here on out, but going to need the guys outside of Richards/Maxey/Quickley to do something consistently to help out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
His updated bracket has us as 5!! LOLOL..cant stand that guy...doesn't make sense whatsoever. Wish I had Twitter to call him out



With some of these guys, we could win out and still be a FIVE seed in their minds. We just need to correct our own problems and be playing better by the SEC tournament.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gharding07

Kingslayer07

Heisman
Jan 23, 2020
8,525
10,392
113
With some of these guys, we could win out and still be a FIVE seed in their minds. We just need to correct our own problems and be playing better by the SEC tournament.
Exactly..not that these projections are the be all end all, but my god, at least try not to look like an idiot and do a realistic projection
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poetax

Graced 1

Junior
Sep 18, 2017
299
336
63
Palm is a Purdue fan/Big 10 guy. I'd speculate if UK finishes strong with the 6 remaining games, they'll move up to where some of you want. I honestly don't care about Mock Brackets and in this year, this will be a scary 1st Round game for whomever this year's team plays. Just glad they have no chance of being a 1 because if UK/Cal team was to ever lose in opening round, it would be this year's team against a 16 with their approach to games. Giving away halves of basketball is begging to get beat. To this point, this year's team has shown they are a Sweet 16 caliber without bracket opening up, and peak game will be 2nd round if they can get by the 1st. Hope they grow and improve, but at not point has this team shown they can be trusted to build off a victory. Got their chance to show it here on out, but going to need the guys outside of Richards/Maxey/Quickley to do something consistently to help out.
Spot on per usual. Hoping for FF but expecting s16
 

irishcat1965

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
20,450
43,210
113
Palm is a Purdue fan/Big 10 guy. I'd speculate if UK finishes strong with the 6 remaining games, they'll move up to where some of you want. I honestly don't care about Mock Brackets and in this year, this will be a scary 1st Round game for whomever this year's team plays. Just glad they have no chance of being a 1 because if UK/Cal team was to ever lose in opening round, it would be this year's team against a 16 with their approach to games. Giving away halves of basketball is begging to get beat. To this point, this year's team has shown they are a Sweet 16 caliber without bracket opening up, and peak game will be 2nd round if they can get by the 1st. Hope they grow and improve, but at not point has this team shown they can be trusted to build off a victory. Got their chance to show it here on out, but going to need the guys outside of Richards/Maxey/Quickley to do something consistently to help out.
You could say the exact same thing about 20 of the top 25 teams this year.
 

Blueblood410

Heisman
Sep 5, 2004
19,810
13,124
113
LMAO at georgiabasketballblog.com having us as a 7 seed.

When I think "where can I get the most accurate bracket predictions?" my first thought is definitely georgiabasketballblog.com

How much did they pay off bracketmatrix to be included?

Some people just should not cover college basketball.
 

$Z71$

All-American
Nov 14, 2002
3,718
6,030
0
I’m telling you guys committee with put a royal screw job on UK this year due to Evansville and Utah losses. The computer’s do not like UK (whether it is justifiable or not). I have never thought UK got bad treatment like some do in the past. This board will explode after selection Sunday this year. It is coming. If they lose couple a more, 6 or 7 seed will not be out of the question.
Utah is 84 in the NET. Don’t lump that loss in with Evansville. They are completely different time zones in reference to a loss.
 

HerrosHeroes

Heisman
Aug 16, 2018
27,234
38,039
0
Utah is 84 in the NET. Don’t lump that loss in with Evansville. They are completely different time zones in reference to a loss.
and Ohio St is back in the AP top 25 and South Carolina is 4th in the SEC.

So we officially have 1 horrible L all season and that was on Nov. 12 v. Evansville but the NET is hating on us for some reason.
 

woodberry79

Junior
Nov 15, 2019
233
284
0
and Ohio St is back in the AP top 25 and South Carolina is 4th in the SEC.

So we officially have 1 horrible L all season and that was on Nov. 12 v. Evansville but the NET is hating on us for some reason.
I'm going to try this with you one more time as you seem to struggle with it most. The game of basketball is predicated on 2 concepts; putting the ball in the hole and stopping the other team from putting the ball in the hole. We currently rank 32nd and 51st in the country in those 2 areas. In all these computer ranking like the NET, those 2 numbers impact it more than anything else. Instead of beating your head against the wall in every post, just understand that is why the NET and all these other rankings don't line up with the AP. Its that simple.
 

irishcat1965

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
20,450
43,210
113
I'm going to try this with you one more time as you seem to struggle with it most. The game of basketball is predicated on 2 concepts; putting the ball in the hole and stopping the other team from putting the ball in the hole. We currently rank 32nd and 51st in the country in those 2 areas. In all these computer ranking like the NET, those 2 numbers impact it more than anything else. Instead of beating your head against the wall in every post, just understand that is why the NET and all these other rankings don't line up with the AP. Its that simple.
Actually basketball is predicated on winning the games. If the computers say a nine loss Michigan State team is better than a UK team that beat them and has a 20-5 record, then the computer rankings are pure folly.
 

hotelblue

Heisman
Jul 6, 2006
41,683
13,121
0
if sdsu, gonzaga, dayton and baylor are the 1 seeds a 4 or 5 seed isn’t going to bother me much this year. we’re straight up better than gonzaga and sdsu imo. and we would have the fan support over baylor or dayton wherever the location. including dayton even though that probably won’t happen. usually the difference between a 3 and 4 is big but i don’t think it is this year. you play a 5 and a 1 or a 2 and a 7. this year the 2 and 7 could be duke and msu, or ku and lsu. the 1 is probably a mid major and the 5 is going to be in the auburn, oregon, butler range.
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
Just be 22-5 by the end of this week, and the CATS will be firmly on the 3-seed line. But I think we're in for an absolute war tomorrow night, and it may not end well. Would love to see a statement W.





Well it is at LSU, which is a benefit for them plus being raped there has happened a lot by the refs. ESPN has LSU % of winning 65% to UK 35%.
 

awf

Heisman
May 31, 2006
10,411
20,774
0
Well it is at LSU, which is a benefit for them plus being raped there has happened a lot by the refs. ESPN has LSU % of winning 65% to UK 35%.
Of course they have the percentages like that........they know ahead of time how the refs will screw UK at LSU.........UK has to be far and away superior to the opposing team to win on the road in the SEC.........UK has a talented squad...........I don't know that they are a superior talented over LSU.........I haven't seen them play yet.......I am still on my anti NCAA protest and not watching anything that doesn't have UK on the floor or field........:boxing:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poetax

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
63,696
105,620
78
I always preach matchups.....I mean other than a few teams, and even then maybe, is there ANYONE you worry about playing. This year more than any in memory, let the cards fall where they may in regards to matchups. There are no world beaters out there this year. None.

For me, the biggest factor is which seeds are playing where and how conducive is that to travel for BBN. If we're playing somewhere out West first weekend after SEC tournament reality is we arent as plentiful coming off a big weekend of spending in Nashville.

I dont even know where the game locations are. 3 4 or 5 seed is what we'll end up with, so Im not going to waste time getting fired up about it. Give us the best locations based on those seedings
 

EliteBlue

Heisman
Mar 27, 2009
16,751
20,269
0
I'm going to try this with you one more time as you seem to struggle with it most. The game of basketball is predicated on 2 concepts; putting the ball in the hole and stopping the other team from putting the ball in the hole. We currently rank 32nd and 51st in the country in those 2 areas. In all these computer ranking like the NET, those 2 numbers impact it more than anything else. Instead of beating your head against the wall in every post, just understand that is why the NET and all these other rankings don't line up with the AP. Its that simple.
I’d argue it’s based on one thing....score. And the system that uses that one metric alone (Sagarin) has us at #8 in the country and their top 10 matches the eyes test much better.

Sure, the concept of O and D efficiency being what determines games is logical. However, what variables are given weighted value to determine/make up “efficiency”?...when points is all that matters.

Bc logically 32nd/51st combo shouldn’t only have 5 L’s w wins over multiple top 15 teams. Especially when 1 L was w injuries and another was crossing multiple time zones and an 11pm tip Eastern time while the team that didn’t have to travel mid week played in their time zone.
 

Sparkaces

All-American
Sep 19, 2012
6,157
6,289
0
if sdsu, gonzaga, dayton and baylor are the 1 seeds a 4 or 5 seed isn’t going to bother me much this year. we’re straight up better than gonzaga and sdsu imo. and we would have the fan support over baylor or dayton wherever the location. including dayton even though that probably won’t happen. usually the difference between a 3 and 4 is big but i don’t think it is this year. you play a 5 and a 1 or a 2 and a 7. this year the 2 and 7 could be duke and msu, or ku and lsu. the 1 is probably a mid major and the 5 is going to be in the auburn, oregon, butler range.
Kansas is prob the best team and they will prob beat Baylor 2 out of 3. Other than Kansas I would def take any of the other one's in a sweet 16 matchup. Duke will be tough, but just because of refs and location (they are a lock in the East) so I would rather not go East or Midwest.
 

Sparkaces

All-American
Sep 19, 2012
6,157
6,289
0
I’d argue it’s based on one thing....score. And the system that uses that one metric alone (Sagarin) has us at #8 in the country and their top 10 matches the eyes test much better.

Sure, the concept of O and D efficiency being what determines games is logical. However, what variables are given weighted value to determine/make up “efficiency”?...when points is all that matters.

Bc logically 32nd/51st combo shouldn’t only have 5 L’s w wins over multiple top 15 teams. Especially when 1 L was w injuries and another was crossing multiple time zones and an 11pm tip Eastern time while the team that didn’t have to travel mid week played in their time zone.
Yeah, I mean the computers don't factor in EJ being out and Hagans playing on one leg. Look we shouldn't have lost, but you would think humans on the committee would see that was a fluke and somewhat explainable especially if this team only loses one more game the rest of the season. I will bet any amount of money Palm has no idea or doesn't care that UK had injuries in the Evansville game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gharding07
Jan 30, 2018
16,155
24,635
0
His updated bracket has us as 5!! LOLOL..cant stand that guy...doesn't make sense whatsoever. Wish I had Twitter to call him out
Common sense and the eye test has us as #10 in the country. The AP doesn't love us so that's good enough for me. Screw metrics this year the NET has ARZ as a Top 10 team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gharding07

chhawaten64

Sophomore
Jan 7, 2017
249
110
38
if you are in first one or two fine but i think any where else in order to win national title you have to win six games i do not care who we play on the way there i would prefer to beat the best in the field