Really didn’t go into detail but figured we need all the basketball intel we can get.
Really hope this team excels in the shot blocking department.
Last edited:
Also hoping we are pretty good at three point basket making.
Really didn’t go into detail but figured we need all the basketball intel we can get.
Really hope this team excels in the blocking shot department.
Jackson, Toppin impressive in practice. Expect Ware to be next.
The “Pilgrim” phenomenon.
He could be a little of what MKG was for us, just a bit taller.
If anything it may help actually. Every arena Kentucky plays in is bouncing like crazy at the excitement of Kentucky coming to town. That’ll be negated a bit this year. And let’s be honest, Rupp won’t be that much differentI hope we are good at playing without fans in the stands.
The only thing that concerns me about Jackson is 200lbs. He's gonna struggle in the SEC trying to play power forward or center while only being 200lbs. He will get knocked around like a pinball under the rim. I think he would be a good compliment to Sarr down low, but we need Sarr to be eligible to have any legitimate shot at being a contender.
Agreed....MKG was a beast on boards, could lead the fast break iwht his speed and handles and strong as an Ox. Jackson we know has no handle and isn't a strong dude yet...Marcus Lee comp all the way..Isaiah Jackson is much more Marcus Lee than he is MKG. Just a really bad comp there.
Isaiah Jackson is much more Marcus Lee than he is MKG. Just a really bad comp there.
Specifically why I mentioned Jackson being taller and shot-blocker. I'm not comparing their games.
The comparison I'm making is that Jackson, as our 5th or 6th best player, could be the "do anything, guard anyone" type that MKG was. We won't need Jackson to win us games with scoring, or I hope we don't need him to at least.
Okay. You can put it in whatever terms you’d like, it’s just a comp that doesn’t make sense. Like I said, Marcus Lee would b a good comp. Jackson and MKG’s games are just entirely different and there are so many better comps out there than that one.
Because you're thinking about it in position and size, in measurables. And you're not wrong, For that reason Jackson is in the same mold as Lee.
But, I also expect Jackson to perform a bit better, and be more hungry, than Marcus Lee was, who averaged 2 and 2 for his first two years, had an OK 3rd year, then bailed. I think Jackson's contributions will be closer to MKG's, than Lee's.
Because you're thinking about it in position and size, in measurables. And you're not wrong, For that reason Jackson is in the same mold as Lee.
But, I also expect Jackson to perform a bit better, and be more hungry, than Marcus Lee was, who averaged 2 and 2 for his first two years, had an OK 3rd year, then bailed. I think Jackson's contributions will be closer to MKG's, than Lee's.
The only thing that concerns me about Jackson is 200lbs. He's gonna struggle in the SEC trying to play power forward or center while only being 200lbs. He will get knocked around like a pinball under the rim. I think he would be a good compliment to Sarr down low, but we need Sarr to be eligible to have any legitimate shot at being a contender.
The reports of Jackson’s timing in shot blocking and aggressiveness as a rebounder — and especially Cal’s remark that he’s a tenacious defender capable of guarding 1-through-5 — suggest a player ready to contribute a lot more than Marcus Lee, who was essentially a volley ball player making the transition to basketball when he got to Lexington.
I note Jackson is the same weight and an inch or two taller than Jarred Vanderbilt. Maybe he can bring some of what JV would have if healthy.
No criticism intended. Yeah, we have the benefit of knowing what Marcus Lee’s true skill level was as opposed to his high school rating - and I’m actually appreciative of what Lee contributed. But based on what informed sources have said about Jackson’s instincts as a shot blocker, rebounder abs defender - including Cal and Mintz and others - I think it is realistic to expect him to contribute more as a freshman.A bit of revisionist history here on how we would have looked at Marcus Lee the summer before his freshman year and how we look at him now. Lee was a McDonald’s All-American and a more highly rested player out of high school than Jackson is (overall #19 in his class vs #28). That’s pretty good for a guy who was essentially just a volleyball player. Something tells me if someone would have said that about him here before we saw him play, they would have been torn to shreds.
Also I’m not saying Jackson is 100% Marcus Lee. I was just saying it’s an infinitely better player comparison than MKG, which just makes no sense.
Weird to think Jackson and Vanderbilt weighed about the same. Vanderbilt’s upper body was jacked, Jackson is a toothpick.
Ha, you got that right!!If anything it may help actually. Every arena Kentucky plays in is bouncing like crazy at the excitement of Kentucky coming to town. That’ll be negated a bit this year. And let’s be honest, Rupp won’t be that much different![]()
Yes, I’m thinking about it in every term that makes sense when you’re comparing one player to another.
It’s not an insult to compare Jackson to Lee. Lee was a highly decorated high school player and compares to Jackson very similarly in skill set and measureables. Lee contributed to some big wins with his energy and ability to block shots and crash boards. I’m not insulting Jackson by making the comp. The MKG thing just isn’t anywhere in the same ballpark.
Here you are again trying to sound more knowledgeable than you really are. The MKG comparison is actually a really good one. Both can guard any position, both are high motor and gonna compete every single play. Both need to work on their offensive game, making them both defensive players.
The Marcus Lee comparison is actually a very bad one. But I see, no one is gonna change your low IQ mind!
Facepalm. Okay.
For what it’s worth, MKG was a proficient offensive player in college in spite of his lack of a jump shot. He was a demon leading a fast break and could really put the ball on the floor and pass it as well. MKG was so, so much more than a defensive player at Kentucky.
Never said he was bad at offense but he needed to develop a jump shot. He was known for his defense, which in turn made him a defensive player. His FG % was around 50%. His 3 point percentage was like 25%.
Same exact thing Jackson needs to work on. They are very very similar when you look at what they bring to the table as freshman.
The only thing that concerns me about Jackson is 200lbs. He's gonna struggle in the SEC trying to play power forward or center while only being 200lbs. He will get knocked around like a pinball under the rim. I think he would be a good compliment to Sarr down low, but we need Sarr to be eligible to have any legitimate shot at being a contender.
You’re still just talking about FG% and 3 point % when you’re talking about offense. Like I said, MKG could really put it on the floor. He could pass. He’s a top 3 player for me in the Cal era in leading a fast break. For me it’s MKG, Wall, and Fox. MKG would grab a rebound and just turn it into a fast break the other way all by himself. Jackson will not do that. It’s not who he is.
They’re just not similar basketball players in any way, I’ll be happy to revisit this thread with you once the season starts.
My thoughts exactly, on both fronts.If anything it may help actually. Every arena Kentucky plays in is bouncing like crazy at the excitement of Kentucky coming to town. That’ll be negated a bit this year. And let’s be honest, Rupp won’t be that much different![]()
I hope we are good at playing without fans in the stands.