IU #4 recruiting class

Big John Stud

All-American
Jan 14, 2003
23,281
8,876
0
IU hasn't been to a Final Four since Mike Davis led them there EIGHTEEN YEARS AGO! IU is irrelevant, they can't even consistently make the tournament anymore, and they're fans are still trash. Why are we even talking about them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cattough
Jan 29, 2003
18,120
12,185
0
They do have the #9 ranked class so far, so that's not too shabby. If Archie can keep the Indiana kids home, he will have some really good teams.
Rivals has them at #7 currently. Not bad, but to put that in perspective LSU is #5.

Disclaimer - I totally get that they are geeked to get Romeo. We'd do the same, I'm sure, where the shoes on our feet instead. But.......all this, about one kid, who is only going to be there a season? Is it really worth all the hosannas?
 

CatsPaws270

Heisman
Dec 7, 2015
24,525
64,108
113
Rivals has them at #7 currently. Not bad, but to put that in perspective LSU is #5.

Disclaimer - I totally get that they are geeked to get Romeo. We'd do the same, I'm sure, where the shoes on our feet instead. But.......all this, about one kid, who is only going to be there a season? Is it really worth all the hosannas?
And that #7 really is just because of Romeo alone...take him out and they probably have a big drop.
 

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,814
0
Check out the highlights for Jerome Hunter, Damezi Anderson, Robert Phinisee and Jake Forrester.

Jeez, haven't you learned yet that youtube highlights are fool's gold? EVERYBODY looks awesome when you only show their highlights and cut out their mistakes and weaknesses.

I believe only one of those guys (Hunter) you listed is ranked in the Top 100. That's all I need to know the rest probably are not gonna be impact players for awhile, if ever. I don't care what their "highlights" look like.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: awf

plaxico80

Heisman
Nov 25, 2002
25,233
16,399
113
Jeez, haven't you learned yet that youtube highlights are fool's gold? EVERYBODY looks awesome when you only show out their highlights and cut out their mistakes and weaknesses.

I believe only one of those guys (Hunter) you listed is ranked in the Top 100. That's all I need to know the rest probably are not gonna be impact players for awhile, if ever. I don't care what their "highlights" look like.

Oh, I’m not saying highlights tell the entire story about kids. Obviously not but it can give you a bit of an insight in their games.

Hunter can score and should be able to do that early. Hunter is also a very good defender. Anderson is a shooter. He’ll get minutes if he can defend. Forrester and Race Thompson aren’t scorers but they are perfect bigs for Archie’s style of ball. They run the floor and defend. Both will get a bunch of minutes. Phinisee may be the most important player after Hunter and Langford. Phinisee may end up overtaking Green as PG if Green’s street ball continues to dominate the way he plays.
 

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,814
0
Oh, I’m not saying highlights tell the entire story about kids. Obviously not but it can give you a bit of an insight in their games.

Hunter can score and should be able to do that early. Hunter is also a very good defender. Anderson is a shooter. He’ll get minutes if he can defend. Forrester and Race Thompson aren’t scorers but they are perfect bigs for Archie’s style of ball. They run the floor and defend. Both will get a bunch of minutes. Phinisee may be the most important player after Hunter and Langford. Phinisee may end up overtaking Green as PG if Green’s street ball continues to dominate the way he plays.

Are you aware that nobody here has any idea who any of these names you're talking about (other than maybe Hunter) even are?

UK fans don't pay attention to recruits who aren't ranked in the Top 100. Do you know why? Because we don't need to.

Seems like this conversation you're seeking would work better if you tried having it with some fellow IU fans who actually care about these names like you do.
 
Last edited:

plaxico80

Heisman
Nov 25, 2002
25,233
16,399
113
Are you aware that nobody here has any idea who any of these names you're talking about (other than maybe Hunter) even are?

UK fans don't pay attention to recruits who aren't ranked in the Top 100. Do you know why? Because we don't need to.

Seems like this conversation you're seeking would work better if you tried having it with some fellow IU fans who actually care about these names like you do.

Sorry dude, I thought we were talking basketball.
 

USSLair

All-American
Apr 9, 2017
4,489
6,957
0
Yep, a little disappointing in the moment, but it's pretty sad that a Second Round victory over a mediocre Kentucky team is the most relevant moment an alleged "Blueblood" program has had in the last 15 years.

Indiana is not a Blueblood. Haven't been in a long long long long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf

SIhoosier26

Heisman
Sep 8, 2017
12,908
24,132
0
Jeez, haven't you learned yet that youtube highlights are fool's gold? EVERYBODY looks awesome when you only show out their highlights and cut out their mistakes and weaknesses.

I believe only one of those guys (Hunter) you listed is ranked in the Top 100. That's all I need to know the rest probably are not gonna be impact players for awhile, if ever. I don't care what their "highlights" look like.
3 top 100 recruits, Phinesee, Hunter, and Romeo. 2 top 50, Romeo, and Hunter. Anderson and Forrester can play, all in less than a year, Archie and IU will be fine.
 

awf

Heisman
May 31, 2006
10,411
20,774
0
3 top 100 recruits, Phinesee, Hunter, and Romeo. 2 top 50, Romeo, and Hunter. Anderson and Forrester can play, all in less than a year, Archie and IU will be fine.
Yes, you are absolutely right.....they will be fine for a mid tier Big10 team.....
 

Jonathan40330

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2014
1,279
1,591
81
Well, no joke the title of blue blood doesn't just disappear, but when you've largely been wholly and utterly irrelevant in regards to consistent March and April runs for over a quarter century, then those who exhibit sustained success discount you.
 

namnik

Senior
Dec 21, 2001
4,669
564
0
ESPN was the lowest at 11, but highest in BigTen.
All other pages had IU top 10.

Maybe you looked at a Pre-Romeo ranking?