We have no PG, that’s what kills this team. Askew just can’t do it and honestly Idk if it matters if he stays 10 years. He just to slow to guard and to slow to get in the paint.
He is the biggest problem on the team. When you have a PG that can’t get in the lane it’s impossible to generate any kind of offense.Askew is not the problem with this team
Askew is doing exactly what he is asked to do. He is not the problemHe is the biggest problem on the team. When you have a PG that can’t get in the lane you get what you get what you seen tonight.
He’s to slow,if you can’t beat your man off the dribble on a pick then something is wrong.
On the basketball court? NothingCan someone tell me what Boston is good for ?
How many shooters we have last year?what good would a normal Cal pg do? The team is horrible because its made of up of only 2 players that can shoot.
Boston would be a lot better if he had good PG. It is nearly impossible for a guy his size to get to basket if you have to drive with the whole defense focused on you.Can someone tell me what Boston is good for ?
That’s probably the best way to describe it lol.what Shackelford did to Askew tonight is usually only witnessed in prison showers.
Hair?Can someone tell me what Boston is good for ?
Quickly, Richards (good shooter for the position and shots he took) , sestina, and Juzang was at least a threat that kept people on him because people knew his reputation even if he didnt shoot well for us on the season.How many shooters we have last year?
It doesn’t matter if askew stays 6 years, he isn’t getting any quicker.Askew is not the problem. The problem is that we try to cram 3-4 years of development into one season.
There is more to being a good pg than quicknessIt doesn’t matter if askew stays 6 years, he isn’t getting any quicker.
TheYea, but it makes things a lot easier when you got a guard that has no chance of getting in the lane and drawing defenders.
Yea I agree but it definitely helps.There is more to being a good pg than quickness
Even if they do, doesn’t help us much now. In years past we could say, so and so team just shot lights out and no one was beating them. But Bama was just being Bama tonight. They weren’t jaggernauts. NO ONE is intimidated by UK anymore, especially not n the SEC. So that whole, X team played crazy against UK and then was their normal self next game **** just doesn’t play out anymore. If we stay on this path, will UK even be Bball royalty outside of this state in 5 years? We make fun of Indiana a lot, but how far away are we from that fate? Tell you what, 20 point home losses to Alabama are definitely enough to make me worry about it No matter how poorly they shoot next game.Watch, Alabama will go 10-35 from 3 their next game and lose.
Then explain Gonzaga, Baylor, Nova, Texas, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Creighton, Wisky and Tennessee are able to generate offense? There is maybe 2 point guards on those teams I'd consider as a 'penetrator' per se.He is the biggest problem on the team. When you have a PG that can’t get in the lane it’s impossible to generate any kind of offense.
You have to be kidding....Are you honestly putting the horrendous year of Boston at the feet of PG play?Boston would be a lot better if he had good PG. It is nearly impossible for a guy his size to get to basket if you have to drive with the whole defense focused on you.
He is the biggest problem on the team. When you have a PG that can’t get in the lane it’s impossible to generate any kind of offense.