Is it true about the impeachment process

[Original Mountaineer1]

Yes you can. Its called a defense.

Wow Dave. You can’t just call anyone.

 

[dave]

Wow Dave. You can’t just call anyone.

Yes you literally can.

 

[Original Mountaineer1]

Yes you literally can.

I call Melania Trump. She hot.

 

[dave]

I call Melania Trump. She hot.

If you were on trial mounting a defense you could call her. Of course your fat and ugly like me so you would end up mounting your bedpost again.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

Wow Dave. You can’t just call anyone.

Objection, your honor. Relevance.

Sustained.

***** dave is irrelevant.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

Wouldn't it be awesome if this was the plan all along. Exposing the deep state in a show trial in the Senate for all the world to see in real time.

I'd love to spend a day in your coked up world of nonsense.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

If you were on trial mounting a defense you could call her. Of course your fat and ugly like me so you would end up mounting your bedpost again.

Are you talking about an impeachment trial or a regular civil/criminal trial?

 

[dave]

Objection, your honor. Relevance.

Sustained.

***** dave is irrelevant.

Except the senate can overrule the judge. Poor kkkwrong. BTW, relevance is an issue when making a case mire so than when defending one.

 

[dave]

Are you talking about an impeachment trial or a regular civil/criminal trial?

I dont know, based on the thread how could anyone know?

 

[WVUCOOPER]

I dont know, based on the thread how could anyone know?

lol. Well you keep answering as if you did know. I have no idea about an impeachment trial, but a defense cannot call any person they want in a general civil/criminal trial.

 

[dave]

lol. Well you keep answering as if you did know. I have no idea about an impeachment trial, but a defense cannot call any person they want in a general civil/criminal trial.

Yes they can. It would be sad if I had to qualify it by saying the defense can call anyone they want who is relevant to their case, because I assumed everyone here is older than 9.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

Yes they can.

 

[dave]

My bad. I assumed you were older than 9.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

My bad. I assumed you were older than 9.

I apologize. That was literally my favorite post in the history of this board.

Can we pin this thread?

 

[WVUCOOPER]

My bad. I assumed you were older than 9.

lmao. Now I see you went back and edited your post. Good god. It was so beautiful.

 

[dave]

lmao. Now I see you went back and edited your post. Good god. It was so beautiful.

I had to edit my post because I was wrong to assume you and others were intelligent. If that is beautiful to you, I will pray for you.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

Except the senate can overrule the judge.

No they can't moron. The Chief Justice presides over the trial. That's like saying a jury can override a judge in a criminal trial. JFC, you're a moron.

 

[dave]

No they can't moron. The Chief Justice presides over the hearing. That's like saying a jury can override a judge in a criminal trial. JFC, you're a moron.

There is actual precedent for it. It has happened already. Any smart person could even look it up.

 

[TarHeelEer]

Can we pin this thread?

No

 

[dave]

No they can't moron. The Chief Justice presides over the trial. That's like saying a jury can override a judge in a criminal trial. JFC, you're a moron.

Its not a criminal trial dummy.

 

[dave]

No

Seriously should pin it. My favorite was when he asked if we were discussing a criminal trial or an impeachment proceeding given the title of the thread.....and then tried to mock anyone else.

 

[MountaineerWV]

There is actual precedent for it. It has happened already. Any smart person could even look it up.

Evidence? Link it. [thumbsup]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[MountaineerWV]

There is actual precedent for it. It has happened already. Any smart person could even look it up.

Waiting on the link to back up your claim.....waiting anxiously to read it. Thanks.