Iowa news

Corby2

All-American
Jul 14, 2025
4,331
9,405
113
They came in rested and wrestled a great tournament this past season. Bailey and Kueter are strong candidates for HEW, Crookham will struggle to stay healthy and if he does he is a 4th to 6th placer.
My guess is 5 or 6 AAs with a strong effort to finish 4th again.
Penn st Oklahoma st Nebraska then 4th will be a battle with VA tech Stanford Ohio st Iowa is how I see it
 

dicemen99

All-American
Nov 15, 2005
3,513
5,047
113
125 Leo Deluca
133 Ryan Crookham
141 Nasir Bailey
149 Ryder Block
157 V Vonovich
165 Carter Schubert / Joe Kennedy
174 Gabe Arnold
184 Angelo Ferrari
197 Harvey Ludington
Hvy B Kueter

if Gabe can take that next step and Ferrari find some offense this is a very formidable lineup.
They should have AAs at 133-141-149-174-184- HVY

and National Title contenders at 133 and 184
that is not a team to rule out

But a lot of that is contingent on Crrokham being healthy, Gabe taking a next step and Angelo finding some offense!
Nobody is ruling them out for 3rd or 4th if everything breaks right for them.

Formidable is relative unless you’ve been hiding under a rock for the past few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lil Nicky Scarfo

Joejitsu

Senior
Jun 10, 2025
376
522
93
Nobody is ruling them out for 3rd or 4th if everything breaks right for them.

Formidable is relative unless you’ve been hiding under a rock for the past few years.
I mean formidable in the national picture.
obviously... PSU is the front runner but if OKSt would stumble Iowa and ohio state can compete for 2nd. I do think VTech will be in the mix but a lot of unknowns still for VTech... Iowa has a proven lineup and showed compete for 3rd and possibly even 2nd if OKST would have any injuries or setbacks

Top 5 in the country is pretty formidable.
 

dicemen99

All-American
Nov 15, 2005
3,513
5,047
113
Top 5 in the country is pretty formidable.
This is probably the wrong board for that sentiment.

Honestly, it’s pretty bad if the HR is the right board for it as well. It might work well on the Rutgers board though.

There have only been a handful of teams that have won or competed for NCs in the last couple of decades. A team that finished 5th would not be one of the formidable teams for any of them during this time period.
 

El_Jefe

Heisman
Oct 11, 2021
3,660
14,898
113
This is probably the wrong board for that sentiment.

Honestly, it’s pretty bad if the HR is the right board for it as well. It might work well on the Rutgers board though.

There have only been a handful of teams that have won or competed for NCs in the last couple of decades. A team that finished 5th would not be one of the formidable teams for any of them during this time period.
I'm sure it's formidable to the teams Iowa looks to poach from every spring.
 

Joejitsu

Senior
Jun 10, 2025
376
522
93
This is probably the wrong board for that sentiment.

Honestly, it’s pretty bad if the HR is the right board for it as well. It might work well on the Rutgers board though.

There have only been a handful of teams that have won or competed for NCs in the last couple of decades. A team that finished 5th would not be one of the formidable teams for any of them during this time period.
we are in the middle of something very rare... a dynasty is the exception not the expectation!
I think if you are top 5 in the country at anything... you are formidable

by definition : A formidable opponent/adversary: Someone who is extremely difficult to beat in a contest or competition.
I think that there are like 78 or 79 D1 wrestling teams in the country!

If all but 3 or 4 teams in the country find you pretty hard to beat (74 of them would say Iowa is formidable)...
If we are looking at if from the lens of the top two or three teams... then maybe not as much but even the top teams with the exception of us... would not call IOWA an easy out!

I get it.... we are on a PSU board... we see it only from a PSU lens ... but there are nearly 80 teams and we are probably the only team that would be looking at winning 8-10 weight classes vs them

even OKST would be in danger of dropping 3-4 bouts (Arnold, Ferrari, Kueter at least) and a couple others could be close... meaning a slip up here or there could swing the match!
We are the only team that would not feel that way vs IOWA right now.

That is formidable to me! JMO
 

Misalorales

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2025
1,361
4,149
113
we are in the middle of something very rare... a dynasty is the exception not the expectation!
I think if you are top 5 in the country at anything... you are formidable

by definition : A formidable opponent/adversary: Someone who is extremely difficult to beat in a contest or competition.
I think that there are like 78 or 79 D1 wrestling teams in the country!

If all but 3 or 4 teams in the country find you pretty hard to beat (74 of them would say Iowa is formidable)...
If we are looking at if from the lens of the top two or three teams... then maybe not as much but even the top teams with the exception of us... would not call IOWA an easy out!

I get it.... we are on a PSU board... we see it only from a PSU lens ... but there are nearly 80 teams and we are probably the only team that would be looking at winning 8-10 weight classes vs them

even OKST would be in danger of dropping 3-4 bouts (Arnold, Ferrari, Kueter at least) and a couple others could be close... meaning a slip up here or there could swing the match!
We are the only team that would not feel that way vs IOWA right now.

That is formidable to me! JMO
I'm only going to nitpick the " a dynasty is the exception not the expectation" portion of this. This sport, maybe more than any other, is essentially one dynasty after another and has been for basically the entirety of its NCAA history.
 

Joejitsu

Senior
Jun 10, 2025
376
522
93
I'm only going to nitpick the " a dynasty is the exception not the expectation" portion of this. This sport, maybe more than any other, is essentially one dynasty after another and has been for basically the entirety of its NCAA history.
still 3 dynasties ... Iowa / OKST/ PSU
out of 80 programs..... only three has hand their claim (Maybe 4)

that is an exception!
 

vhsalum

All-Conference
Nov 14, 2002
1,558
3,698
113
still 3 dynasties ... Iowa / OKST/ PSU
out of 80 programs..... only three has hand their claim (Maybe 4)

that is an exception!
 

AgSurfer

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2013
671
2,139
92
we are in the middle of something very rare... a dynasty is the exception not the expectation!
I think if you are top 5 in the country at anything... you are formidable

by definition : A formidable opponent/adversary: Someone who is extremely difficult to beat in a contest or competition.
I think that there are like 78 or 79 D1 wrestling teams in the country!

If all but 3 or 4 teams in the country find you pretty hard to beat (74 of them would say Iowa is formidable)...
If we are looking at if from the lens of the top two or three teams... then maybe not as much but even the top teams with the exception of us... would not call IOWA an easy out!

I get it.... we are on a PSU board... we see it only from a PSU lens ... but there are nearly 80 teams and we are probably the only team that would be looking at winning 8-10 weight classes vs them

even OKST would be in danger of dropping 3-4 bouts (Arnold, Ferrari, Kueter at least) and a couple others could be close... meaning a slip up here or there could swing the match!
We are the only team that would not feel that way vs IOWA right now.

That is formidable to me! JMO
I think if you had used the word “competitive” as opposed to “formidable,” most of us would agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: o_Grass

Annieat285

Redshirt
Jan 9, 2016
4
13
3

It seems like the recent williams results have stirred up some discussions, but
"Williams or Teemer type?" Oh no...
 

Lil Nicky Scarfo

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2025
1,709
4,897
113
The Iowa PSU 2027 prediction thread on their board is a hoot.

One of our own, PUR158, is dribbling MSU’s head on the ground.


PUR158

All-Conference​

Some good information put out in this thread. I learned that "offensive dynamos" Blaze and Lilledahl more than doubled or almost doubled the bonus rate of Iowa's highest returning bonus point scorer.
 

mvattivo

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2005
434
2,097
93
I broke it down for them in that thread, but, they had many excuses ready to go.

Bonus rates from starters last year.

125: Lilledahl = 54%, Peterson = 13%
133: Blaze = 71%, Ayala = 39%
141: Davis = 43%, Bailey 20%
149: Van Ness = 74%, Block 31%
157: Duke = 70%, Williams 20%/Voinovich 22%
165: Mesenbrink = 96%, Caliendo = 63%
174: Haines = 78%, Kennedy = 39%
184: Welsh = 54%, Ferrari = 21%
197: Barr = 96%, Arnold = 25%
285: Mirasola = 39%, Kueter = 0%
 

El_Jefe

Heisman
Oct 11, 2021
3,660
14,898
113
I broke it down for them in that thread, but, they had many excuses ready to go.

Bonus rates from starters last year.

125: Lilledahl = 54%, Peterson = 13%
133: Blaze = 71%, Ayala = 39%
141: Davis = 43%, Bailey 20%
149: Van Ness = 74%, Block 31%
157: Duke = 70%, Williams 20%/Voinovich 22%
165: Mesenbrink = 96%, Caliendo = 63%
174: Haines = 78%, Kennedy = 39%
184: Welsh = 54%, Ferrari = 21%
197: Barr = 96%, Arnold = 25%
285: Mirasola = 39%, Kueter = 0%
100% bonus rate for Iowa since all of them scored bonus.
 

Lil Nicky Scarfo

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2025
1,709
4,897
113
I broke it down for them in that thread, but, they had many excuses ready to go.

Bonus rates from starters last year.

125: Lilledahl = 54%, Peterson = 13%
133: Blaze = 71%, Ayala = 39%
141: Davis = 43%, Bailey 20%
149: Van Ness = 74%, Block 31%
157: Duke = 70%, Williams 20%/Voinovich 22%
165: Mesenbrink = 96%, Caliendo = 63%
174: Haines = 78%, Kennedy = 39%
184: Welsh = 54%, Ferrari = 21%
197: Barr = 96%, Arnold = 25%
285: Mirasola = 39%, Kueter = 0%
That’s just nitpicking
 

Sir Pin Alot

All-Conference
Jun 25, 2025
406
1,148
93
I broke it down for them in that thread, but, they had many excuses ready to go.

Bonus rates from starters last year.

125: Lilledahl = 54%, Peterson = 13%
133: Blaze = 71%, Ayala = 39%
141: Davis = 43%, Bailey 20%
149: Van Ness = 74%, Block 31%
157: Duke = 70%, Williams 20%/Voinovich 22%
165: Mesenbrink = 96%, Caliendo = 63%
174: Haines = 78%, Kennedy = 39%
184: Welsh = 54%, Ferrari = 21%
197: Barr = 96%, Arnold = 25%
285: Mirasola = 39%, Kueter = 0%
Adding up all the returning bonus rates barely gets you to 100%. :ROFLMAO:
 

Aardvark86

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
2,066
3,119
113
The Iowa PSU 2027 prediction thread on their board is a hoot.

One of our own, PUR158, is dribbling MSU’s head on the ground.


PUR158

All-Conference​

Some good information put out in this thread. I learned that "offensive dynamos" Blaze and Lilledahl more than doubled or almost doubled the bonus rate of Iowa's highest returning bonus point scorer.
Honestly, when I first peeked at that thread, I was reminded of the inscription at the gates of hell in Dante’s inferno: abandon all hope ye who enter here”
 

Cali_Nittany1

All-Conference
Dec 11, 2019
795
3,403
93
It is all about the duals now, by the end of summer they will talk themselves into a 5-5 split. My personal favorite storyline over there is how Gabe Arnold is going to be "set loose" on the 174 weight class.

After whoever is repping Penn State and Minto, 174 is pretty shallow next season. Arnold is in a group of wrestlers that have a reasonable shot at 3rd (I'm picking Mantanona).
 
  • Like
Reactions: BriantheLion

PUR158

All-Conference
Feb 11, 2025
460
1,635
93
After whoever is repping Penn State and Minto, 174 is pretty shallow next season. Arnold is in a group of wrestlers that have a reasonable shot at 3rd (I'm picking Mantanona).
That is fair, I think Wask and Steed are ahead of him too. Wask beat him last year. He will be in a ton of 4-1 matches. I say he finishes where he was last year at 197. He is who he is, I just thought it comical that they feel a cut down to 74 would now make him more offensive.
 

Coastal2

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2025
439
1,582
93
Did everyone miss the big Iowa news last week? Kale Peterson removed himself from the portal and will stay at Iowa.

Only reason he'd stay is if he expects to be the man at 133 ie Crookham is cooked and will never make it through a season healthy.