I'm familiar enough with Oregon to know that they are NOT getting an at-large bid, despite the fact that a vaunted authority the likes of SB Nation gave them a mention. Got any keen insights from Bleacher Report, while you're on a roll?
I wouldn't even root for Iowa to lose if it wasn't for the moronic goobers who have nothing better to do than camp on this board.
My personal predictions have nothing to do with it. Oregon finished 6th in a terrible conference that isn't a lock to get any at-large bids. The only reason on God's green Earth you're putting them on the bubble is because they lost to Iowa. But yeh, I'm being too emotional and just am not familiar enough with Oregon to know where they stand in the at-large pecking order.
Dr. Tom would be a great hire but he is long since retired, Nebraska needs to stay in their lane regarding the caliber of coach they could hire in reality.
These two sites are usually pretty reliable. Where do they have Oregon seeded?
SB Nation, which I'm told is a very reliable source when it comes to NCAA bracketology, says Minnesota will get a better seed than Iowa:
I'm confused. If Oregon is "very much on the bubble" as you stated last night, why are they absolutely nowhere to be found in any of these projections? Is it possible that you pulled that statement straight out of your butt because you thought it helped Iowa's case?
That’s a pretty specific example. I like it and plan to use it in performance reviews at work.
No, no, no ---- Oregon is very much on the bubble! I too thought Oregon had absolutely no chance at an at-large, but then someone who says he knows wayyyyyyyyy more than me about Oregon's situation assured me that I was wrong.
