Impeach Trump
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
It's because they have no other reason to convince voters to pull a lever for them. Trump hatred, is all they have to sell.
If they think this is a winning strategy, why aren't they running on it instead of trying to hide it? What would they impeach him for? They don't say do they?
It's a dangerous platform to run on - win and impeach and remove - because if it doesn't happen then it will get ugly.
It's not their platform. It just something lazy, partisan hacks say. It's a midterm election. Some are running on trade policies, healthcare, etc. Races are even more local in a midterm and yet EVERY midterm is a referendum on the President.
Exactly. In my district, the incumbant is a lazy Trump sycophant who hasn't done crap. Her challenger is embracing all sorts of local programs to improve local businesses.
It shouldn't be. Every one (D or R) bows down to their party leaders on votes, unless they can vote the opposite because it doesn't impact the results.
which is the way it should be......congrats to the challenger....run on positives instead of hatred.....I could vote for that
You mean like when the Repubs regained the majority in Congress? But...you are correct and it goes both ways.
Agree...but the Dems and the media have taken this hate and negative campaign to a whole new level.
I'm not exactly sure what part of my post you are referring to, but yes, generally the party out of power wins power in the midterm election.
some of them.....not all of them.....but still too many...like I said yesterday...the textbook is being written and the world is watching
I'm not sure what that has to do with my post. Are you suggesting that all races should be run on national issues only? Well.....good luck.
You are correct. Asa a side note, North carolina is not going to have to redraw their districts. Federal judges ruled it was too late.
I certainly do and think you do as well, but chalk it up to you having a senior moment. Or was the terrorist fist bump coverage for the early Trump Presidency?
The **** are they going to impeach him for? There has to be some crime he is guilty of. With Mueller acquiescing to written responses of Trump, that ship has sailed babygirl.
There doesn't need to be a guilty verdict for impeachment. The impeachment rules are vague. It's a political thing and not a true legal things. My guess is it will be for obstruction and the campaign finance violations. That's my 2 cents, dollface.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Senior moment? And as for a "terrorist fist bump coverage"........I have no idea what you're talking about.
Impeachment is for those that "may have committed" what you listed. Removal is on conviction. Did they have civics class when you old farts went to school?
Ok, but they're nowhere near close to any of those, with Mueller heeling for a written statement.
The House doesn't need anything from Mueller. They can go off the Cohen case. I'm not saying they will or should, just clarifying.
You think that is a good thing? This nonsense should be taken away from the states since both parties draw ridiculous districts.
I hope God that doesn't happen. We have enough partisan political shenanigans without that.
I don't see much happening because I don't think the party is energized enough right now. Although the upset in Mass last night gives me hope that grass roots efforts can get the minorities and the students to the polls.
And given to whom? The congress? Another bad institution. I'm pretty sure that winners draw up the boundaries and the losers have to work harder to get that privilege. I believe that in the constitution, all rights not given to the federal govt are given to the states. Drawing up the boundaries is a legitimate right of the states. The judicial might be overstepping it's right.