Of course, I don’t know whether or not Hopkins wanted to play SF or came to UK with the understanding that he would be allowed to play the 3 instead of the 4. I just know – because we’ve seen it forever – that traditionally (at least the last 40 years or so) almost every high ranked recruit wanted to play down a position because they thought it improved their desirability to the NBA. And I don’t see that what Hopkins is doing now at Providence proves it one way or the other. (But maybe he’s said something publicly that you’ve seen or read)If that were the case, then why is he perfectly happy to play PF now? He plays exclusively at the 4 for Providence and is totally kicking *** there. If he thinks as you suggest, then why would he transfer to a school where the coach intended to use him as Cooley does?
We went through a similar thing with Poythress. For years Cal kept trying to make him into a 3, where he thoroughly struggled. Then his final season, Cal finally let him stay at the 4 and he performed much better. Never got the impression that was Poy’s choice. think it’s mostly Cal’s issue, not theirs, he’s long been known for trying to wedge players into positions where they’re less comfortable in search of bigger longer lineups.
In the end , however, it really doesn’t matter does it? Because I agree with you it’s the coach’s responsibility to put a player in the spot he best helps the team win, regardless of what the player wants. So, whether Calipari pushes this unproductive and harmful (to the team) idea of playing down a position or it’s the player’s desire, the result is usually the same in my opinion – a team prone to offensive struggles and generally not as good as it could be.