Honest question for Cal supporters

DelkBowl

Heisman
Oct 4, 2015
10,805
11,876
101
Why do we have to leave we were fans way before he came along ? We can have our opinions just like you can have your opinions . We love the University of Kentucky and not the University of Calipari we just want what's best for our school we have cheered for since we were born!
You don’t have to but why make yourselves miserable when there’s a great big beautiful world out there. Lean to love other things as much as UK. Variety is the spice of life. Sports will always let you down.
 

JoeBolognas

All-American
Feb 10, 2020
3,319
8,238
0
Well you picked a bad comparison. Roy has three titles. Cal has one. Roy has a title in the last five years, Cal has zero.

Sorry about your poor reading comprehension. The OP was about negating past accomplishments and just looking at “the bad stretch.” Starting in 2010, Roy went six straight seasons without a final four, and even missed the tournament.

The same argument being made in this thread about Cal could have been made about Roy then.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
Another reason is that a “miracle” occurred in that game: though Auburn was in foul trouble, in the final 9:17 of regulation, they were not called for a SINGLE foul. https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/threads/no-fouls-on-auburn-in-the-last-9-18.294090/

I looked at the stats for both Auburn’s tournament games as well as the other teams in the Elite Eight and going that long without a foul simply does not happen, and certainly not in a game that goes to Overtime and sends the winner to the Final Four!

Refs were Mike Roberts (officiated this season’s loss to Notre Dame), Terry Wymer (officiated this season’s loss to UNC) and Brian Dorsey.

At the end of regulation, we were ONE point away from another Final Four, and yet again our opponent got help from the stripes to get there.
Oh geeze. Not again.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
Sorry about your poor reading comprehension. The OP was about negating past accomplishments and just looking at “the bad stretch.” Starting in 2010, Roy went six straight seasons without a final four, and even missed the tournament.

The same argument being made in this thread about Cal could have been made about Roy then.
Had we won the natty last year and lost 3-4 seniors, I would expect a down year this year. Having a really good year then losing seniors, a down year is expected. Losing a whole team where none are seniors every year and having down year is not acceptable. That is a failure of recruiting
 

Sparkaces

All-American
Sep 19, 2012
6,157
6,289
0
Another reason is that a “miracle” occurred in that game: though Auburn was in foul trouble, in the final 9:17 of regulation, they were not called for a SINGLE foul. https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/threads/no-fouls-on-auburn-in-the-last-9-18.294090/

I looked at the stats for both Auburn’s tournament games as well as the other teams in the Elite Eight and going that long without a foul simply does not happen, and certainly not in a game that goes to Overtime and sends the winner to the Final Four!

Refs were Mike Roberts (officiated this season’s loss to Notre Dame), Terry Wymer (officiated this season’s loss to UNC) and Brian Dorsey.

At the end of regulation, we were ONE point away from another Final Four, and yet again our opponent got help from the stripes to get there.
I was talking about Okeeke (sp) against UNC.
 

gwjenning

All-American
Mar 6, 2017
3,735
7,670
0
A rational person would realize just how much luck and chance goes into a single elimination tournament, so no, I don’t think it’s “rational” to think it’s “scary” that he didnt win a title with 2010 or 2015. It’s disappointing and will hurt Cal’s final legacy here, but sometimes you win games you’re supposed to lose and sometimes you lose games you’re supposed to win.

A rational person would realize that holding a coach’s talent THAT THEY RECRUITED against them isn’t really an objective view. A part of coaching is recruiting. Cal does that better than any coach we’ve had. Why not just look at his results - which have been extremely good - and stop trying to diminish them by saying he only did it with great players? At the very least, if you’re going to keep trying to throw that in, shouldn’t you also account for the insane lack of experience he’s routinely working with?

I do understand the fear about not landing the top players anymore. That one is fair, but it’s not like we’ve “fallen” completely beyond any success since he stopped landing those top tier recruits. 2016-2020 wasn’t some drastic failure. We still won a lot.

My hope is that he either gets back to landing those top guys or starts returning more good not great players, and I think there’s reason to be optimistic that he’ll do the latter. People think we just never return players here or that this year is the norm, but last year we started three sophomores and a junior. I think it’s very possible we return most of: Askew, Ware, Fletcher, Allen, Brooks, Jackson from this current team. Maybe one leaves early or one transfers, but we should return a solid core, just like we had last year.
A rational person can realize that Cal is more about putting players into the NBA than he is about winning games, making Final Fours, and winning NC’s at UK. He was even greasy enough to have no on court incentives built into his current contract and Barney went for it.
Wording in his current contract.
“There are no bonuses for on-court performance and the only incentive, as was the case under the old deal, is for the program to maintain a score of 950 in the NCAA's Academic Progress Rate. That would earn him another $50,000 per year.”

At least Cal is outspoken about his goal at UK
2015
“Last year we started the season with a goal," Calipari said. "You may think it was to win a national title or win all the games, [but] it was to get eight players drafted. Well, how can you be about your team if you're worried about getting players drafted? We kind of work it the other way. What are your dreams? What are you looking for? What are you trying to get out of life? How can we help you with that?


"For me, the mission for me is to be a vehicle to help others reach their dreams, to be the stone that creates the ripple in their lives that goes on and on and on. Now in our state, they want my mission to be, 'win national titles, win national titles.' My mission is bigger than that."
Cal does tell us it’s ALL about getting players drafted over winning National Titles

Even what Cal thinks is the greatest day in the history of Kentucky basketball is the complete opposite of the fans
2010
“When Kentucky had five players selected in the first round of the 2010 NBA draft, Calipari riled longtime fans and former players by proclaiming it "the biggest day in the history of Kentucky's program."

Only an irrational person can’t realize that Calipari has hijacked the greatest program in college basketball and turned it into a NBA farm league. If you don’t have enough stars as a recruit or aren’t projected to go to the NBA you ride the pine here until you transfer in most cases. Or you just get tired and bolt for the NBA and go undrafted.

Cal is not and will never be about winning at Kentucky. He has stated this himself and even had his contract structured so that his performance at UK had no affect on his salary. His HUGE salary!
If Kentucky wins games as Cal is pumping players into the league, Cal just views that as a bonus for us fans!

We start the season with Pro Day and end it in June with Cal having someone record him watching the draft!
It‘s pathetic!

Have you ever seen a college coach cater to the NBA like Cal? Rupp would’ve never done that. He would’ve told the scouts to come to the games and watch his boys play like everyone else, that he had a team to coach and didn’t have time for that nonsense!
 
Last edited:

Cawood86_rivals

Heisman
Feb 20, 2005
36,711
64,715
0
this entire discussion has been about the direction cal is supposedly headed in. Please try to keep up, I shouldn’t have to explain everything to you multiple times.

You’ve been plenty critical of him, saying he needs to change but he won’t, etc. You would have made those exact same statements about Roy when he hit his bad stretch, and you would’ve ended up looking extremely dumb for it.
I am just fine in what we are talking about. You seem to think you know me or how I would or wouldn't react. You don't. You don't at all.
He does need to change. Everyone sees that. You are the one who can't seem to stay on topic. It's hard to prop up your narrative and pretend to know what I would or wouldn't do.
I have not been as critical of Cal as I am now. Easy for you to check that. This season is a culmination of his way of doing things. Others have seen if before me. The worse thing to happen for UK was Cal getting the HOF.
You could use a team of just his guys in the NBA and likely win a title. Hard for fans to swallow that knowing he has only won one at UK with all that talent.
 

JoeBolognas

All-American
Feb 10, 2020
3,319
8,238
0
I am just fine in what we are talking about. You seem to think you know me or how I would or wouldn't react. You don't. You don't at all.
He does need to change. Everyone sees that. You are the one who can't seem to stay on topic. It's hard to prop up your narrative and pretend to know what I would or wouldn't do.
I have not been as critical of Cal as I am now. Easy for you to check that. This season is a culmination of his way of doing things. Others have seen if before me. The worse thing to happen for UK was Cal getting the HOF.
You could use a team of just his guys in the NBA and likely win a title. Hard for fans to swallow that knowing he has only won one at UK with all that talent.

You’re correct, I don’t know you. Tend to hang out with more intelligent people that can present more supportable arguments than silly narratives based on emotions and not facts.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
I am just fine in what we are talking about. You seem to think you know me or how I would or wouldn't react. You don't. You don't at all.
He does need to change. Everyone sees that. You are the one who can't seem to stay on topic. It's hard to prop up your narrative and pretend to know what I would or wouldn't do.
I have not been as critical of Cal as I am now. Easy for you to check that. This season is a culmination of his way of doing things. Others have seen if before me. The worse thing to happen for UK was Cal getting the HOF.
You could use a team of just his guys in the NBA and likely win a title. Hard for fans to swallow that knowing he has only won one at UK with all that talent.
I can personally vouch for this. Cawood once was a huge sunshine pumper, because he and I had many arguments about Cal and the direction we were headed. Cawood and several more that once were huge pumpers have seen the light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cawood86_rivals

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
42,777
65,109
113
Interesting question. A bit disingenuous to ask people to disregard Cal’s full record, but interesting. The coach you describe would have entered this season at 140-39 (78% winner) with only one double loss season (26-11 in his third year). He has two Elite Eight finishes out of four trips to the tourney, and one sweet 16 and one second round departure. I think that winning percentage would be behind Adolph and Rick and ahead of Joe B and Tubby.

In a COVID season with all new players he starts 1-6 with what looks like a bad team that most UK fans thought would be very good.

An AD would be reamed for firing that coach.

[edit: that coach also has a .500 record with Duke and UNC, a winning record over MSU and UL]
 
Last edited:

Cawood86_rivals

Heisman
Feb 20, 2005
36,711
64,715
0
I can personally vouch for this. Cawood once was a huge sunshine pumper, because he and I had many arguments about Cal and the direction we were headed. Cawood and several more that once were huge pumpers have seen the light.
So very true. We had several matches. I was very defensive of Cal. Probably to a fault.
I was drunk on the first 6 years. Not sure what has happened in detail since then, but it's obvious Cal's recruiting is not as elite. His staff has completely changed and his approach. I couldn't see it. I do now.
It's not just about this year. People seem to miss this point. Ths year is just the proof of the fears and concerns many on here had well before this year.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
So very true. We had several matches. I was very defensive of Cal. Probably to a fault.
I was drunk on the first 6 years. Not sure what has happened in detail since then, but it's obvious Cal's recruiting is not as elite. His staff has completely changed and his approach. I couldn't see it. I do now.
It's not just about this year. People seem to miss this point. Ths year is just the proof of the fears and concerns many on here had well before this year.
Correct. It is NOT just about this year. It is the trend and this year is the culmination of that trend. It won’t be much, if any, better next year after we lose 6/8 off this team
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
So very true. We had several matches. I was very defensive of Cal. Probably to a fault.
I was drunk on the first 6 years. Not sure what has happened in detail since then, but it's obvious Cal's recruiting is not as elite. His staff has completely changed and his approach. I couldn't see it. I do now.
It's not just about this year. People seem to miss this point. Ths year is just the proof of the fears and concerns many on here had well before this year.
I was on the Cal train till 2015 and saw his pitiful game management. I knew after that game Cal would never win another title here. Then we we got to losing too many guys that were not ready for the draft, Cal dumbed down the schedule and got too wrapped up in the draft. Then all the transfers and I sensed a problem retaining players. Each year I was more convinced than ever I was right. You just saw it later than I did.
 

FtWorthCat

All-Conference
Aug 21, 2001
6,721
4,532
0
I know Cal watched the NBA bubble and is going to adjust lofl, but look at the team he assembled, he has to know the NBA is going more towards shooting and skill and he literally is recruiting the complete opposite guys. He could have handpicked multiple grad transfers that could shoot the lights out, but left 2 scholarships empty. I like Mintz but he prob could have got a more traditional PG and he could've easily got the Powell kid of the kid from Belmont, instead he literally gets 4 6'7 guys that play the same position and have no skill.

Yes, it's a real head scratcher why Cal takes some of the guys that he does. I don't even follow recruiting that much, and it was obvious just looking at the roster before the season that we were hurting in the backcourt. We have two guards on the whole roster, neither of which is a primary ball handler. Both of them are combo guards. To this point in the season, this is easily the worst ball handling team in my lifetime, and I remember every team back to Rupp's final season. Our current assist to turnover ratio: 75 assists 111 turnovers
 
Last edited:

NC Weasel

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2002
18,602
2,027
0
Just as a reminder.

At least 2 of Roy's titles are tainted. One should gmhave come down and they should have been on a post season ban for another.

Just sayin'
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
Yes, it's a real head scratcher why Cal takes some of the guys that he does. I don't even follow recruiting that much, and it was obvious just looking at the roster before the season that we were hurting in the backcourt. We have two guards on the whole roster, neither of which is a primary ball handler. Both of them are combo guards. To this point in the season, this is easily the worst ball handling team in my lifetime, and I remember every team back to Rupp's final season. Our current assist to turnover ratio: 75 assists 111 turnovers
Well, Cal sells “positionless” basketball to recruits, this is why he always has big holes in the roster. He takes the highest ranked recruits he can get, regardless of their position and skill set.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
Just as a reminder.

At least 2 of Roy's titles are tainted. One should gmhave come down and they should have been on a post season ban for another.

Just sayin'
That is very true. But the NCAA was too afraid to do it, so they are still in the record books. And the fact does remain that they played those games and won them. Just like Cal won all the games the NCAA stripped from him
 

Bkr5ky

Sophomore
Jul 4, 2009
492
151
43
My take, Cal has earned grace and patience period. Now, I am not in the lifetime corner but I will give this and next year. I am hopeful and believe the negitive Nancy's will go back to being the silent minority. Currently you are the loudest but not the majority. I still think this team has the talent and will go on a run.
 

FrankUnderwood

Heisman
May 26, 2017
15,912
27,971
0
First off AU had their best 2 players, those guards. I know who you are talking about and he may have went higher in the draft but at that point and time those two guards were the problem.
2ndly we were trying to beat them for a 3rd straight time that season, thats hard.
3rdly its UKs worst start since 1923 not 1911 so get your facts straight.
4thly 5-7 v UT since 2016 and 4-4 v Auburn is not “getting owned.”

1-6 doe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie

FrankUnderwood

Heisman
May 26, 2017
15,912
27,971
0
Your question may be honest but it is stupid. Sure, let's just forget maybe the best five year run in Kentucky basketball history between 2011-2015. Special pleading formulations never work.

And this may be an hottest refute but it’s a stupid refute. It’s clear that the program and success has been trending downward including a 1-6 start which is the worst start in over 100 years. A century.

Keep up friend.
 
Mar 25, 2004
393
574
0
So next year with Brooks, Jackson, ware , toppin, askew, and Mintz, along with the new comers Cal needs to make a big splash and have an exciting year with a great tournament run, elite eight or final four. Other than that I’m with you. May have to make a change.
I hope they recruit at least one shooter.
 

BlobUK

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2009
1,689
1,723
113
Let’s say Cal left after the 2015 38-1 season for the NBA and we hired coach x who took over in 2016

Over the past 5 seasons coach x performed exactly like Cal has, roster turnover and all
Home losses to Evansville and Richmond, going 1-4 against Kansas while allowing them to close in on our all time wins
Losses to terrible Indiana, Kansas State, and Auburn without their best player in the NCAA tournament
Tennessee owning us and Auburn as far as that goes in the SEC

Sitting at 1-6 this season, worst start since 1911 and probably won’t even make the NIT
Taking jabs at the fans and won’t give Allen a chance

Would you still be willing to hang onto Coach x or ready to find someone new?
Our last two teams have been really good. We made the elite 8 and who knows what we would have done last year. You run Cal out of here you better have a really good coach lined up.
 

qwesley

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
23,461
0
Our last two teams have been really good. We made the elite 8 and who knows what we would have done last year. You run Cal out of here you better have a really good coach lined up.
True...but a team with Hagans and Montgomery starting was not going to make a deep run. Hagans being a head case on a successful team is an example of the mindset we need to avoid.

The flip side is also relevant in that we were two very late unexpected commits (Murray and Knox) from two NIT teams.