Head over to peegs

[anon_9qtxg60vqzy0y]

nm

 

[hootervillearnolds]

Your last paragraph is puzzling. Did you watch UK's game Sunday? Probably not. The 3-seed to drop to a 4 in favor of UK is not complicated at all. It's Texas A&M. The 4 seed to swap with Indiana is also easy, it's Duke. A 10 loss Duke team or the winner of the Big10? Hmmm... no brainer. I don't even know why you'd argue with me on this.

Actually I did see the aTm game, sitting in The Linq sports book which is where I also watched IU fall to UM.

As for UK and aTm they split two very close games in last three weeks.

So one could argue that head to head is a push. So go to big wins vs big losses. aTm has 5 top 50 wins and one 100+ Loss.

UK has 2 top 50 wins and 2 sub 100 losses with one of those sub 150.

There is an argument for you.

As for IU / Duke... Did you see their head to head?

 

[Aike]

Actually I did see the aTm game, sitting in The Linq sports book which is where I also watched IU fall to UM.

As for UK and aTm they split two very close games in last three weeks.

So one could argue that head to head is a push. So go to big wins vs big losses. aTm has 5 top 50 wins and one 100+ Loss.

UK has 2 top 50 wins and 2 sub 100 losses with one of those sub 150.

There is an argument for you.

As for IU / Duke... Did you see their head to head?

So a road loss in OT on a controversial call vs. a neutral court win is a push? Get out of here with that crap!

You want to cling to RPI top 50? You're as bad as those committee clowns.

We had 3 RPI top 50 wins, not 2, by the way.

But you're right about one thing. RPI top 50 wins are the only thing that puts aTm ahead of us.

EVERY SINGLE RANKING has us higher.

Our neutral court championship win obviously trumps an OT loss, on the road, with key players injured.

What a joke.

 

[jaknfo90]

Actually I did see the aTm game, sitting in The Linq sports book which is where I also watched IU fall to UM.

As for UK and aTm they split two very close games in last three weeks.

So one could argue that head to head is a push. So go to big wins vs big losses. aTm has 5 top 50 wins and one 100+ Loss.

UK has 2 top 50 wins and 2 sub 100 losses with one of those sub 150.

There is an argument for you.

As for IU / Duke... Did you see their head to head?

Head to head is not a push, take the Pat Adams call out of the equation and odds are its UK twice in the win column. Brad Nessler called out Adams repeatedly during the SECT for his BS calls, the "T" on Humphries at the game in College Station was even worse. UK head and shoulders more deserving of the 3.

 

[hootervillearnolds]

Head to head is not a push, take the Pat Adams call out of the equation and odds are its UK twice in the win column. Brad Nessler called out Adams repeatedly during the SECT for his BS calls, the "T" on Humphries at the game in College Station was even worse. UK head and shoulders more deserving of the 3.

Objectively admit it is close. And if close SC can defend either way, so they go with order that gives TV IU vs UK and aTm vs Texas. And Duke a good chan e to make week 2.

 

[.S&C.]

My god if you're still denying the committee hates UK, loves Duke, and isn't consistent at all, then I'd just ban you if I were a mod. You're too stupid to post.

 

[hootervillearnolds]

My god if you're still denying the committee hates UK, loves Duke, and isn't consistent at all, then I'd just ban you if I were a mod. You're too stupid to post.

They don't hate UK they love TV money

 

[jaknfo90]

Objectively admit it is close. And if close SC can defend either way, so they go with order that gives TV IU vs UK and aTm vs Texas. And Duke a good chan e to make week 2.

Not close, UK plays them to a an OT loss that shouldn't have happened and then settled things once and for all in the SECT. They shared the regular season title, again due to the BS call, and UK wins the tournament...not close by any standard.

 

[.S&C.]

They don't hate UK they love TV money

Yea well that explains our difficult roads and Duke's cake walks.