Greg

vkj91

Heisman
Feb 7, 2007
188,318
49,438
98
Some people are to ignorant to understand the second GS declared his return here, every talking head from every sports outlet in the country would immediately scream the guy who built the program and the sole reason they’re in the B1G is coming back.

The entire state would feel a sense of excitement and recruiting would immediately pick up, season tickets would increase and an air of here we go would permeate the program.
Incredibly, they have no idea about perception and the importance of it at this time.



No, these people would rather bring up a Tulane game from 2010...lmao
So we would win the the off season? Then the season would start. How many points would we give up to Iowa? He gave up 55 with a roster of first round picks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brgRC90

RUnewjersey

Sophomore
Sep 21, 2016
111
108
0
Greg Schiano does not want to come back to Rutgers. He sees his career as being on an upward trajectory and taking the head coaching job at Rutgers is a giant step back for him. He wants a head coaching position however, he knows from first hand experience Rutgers is never going to be in a position to invest what is truly necessary to get the football program headed in the right direction.

Even if Rutgers decided to pay a top-flight coach $4-5 million/year, that is only the tip of the iceberg. The Athletic Department does not have the administrative resources (personnel or support) in place to support the program you’re all hoping for. The issues are financial, systemic and they run deep.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,582
86,603
113

 
  • Like
Reactions: brgRC90

IL Lusciato

Heisman
Oct 31, 2011
10,685
13,303
0
Some people are to ignorant to understand the second GS declared his return here, every talking head from every sports outlet in the country would immediately scream the guy who built the program and the sole reason they’re in the B1G is coming back.

The entire state would feel a sense of excitement and recruiting would immediately pick up, season tickets would increase and an air of here we go would permeate the program.
Incredibly, they have no idea about perception and the importance of it at this time.



No, these people would rather bring up a Tulane game from 2010...lmao

So very well said.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Greg Schiano does not want to come back to Rutgers. He sees his career as being on an upward trajectory and taking the head coaching job at Rutgers is a giant step back for him. He wants a head coaching position however, he knows from first hand experience Rutgers is never going to be in a position to invest what is truly necessary to get the football program headed in the right direction.

Even if Rutgers decided to pay a top-flight coach $4-5 million/year, that is only the tip of the iceberg. The Athletic Department does not have the administrative resources (personnel or support) in place to support the program you’re all hoping for. The issues are financial, systemic and they run deep.

All may be true. If it is then we shouldn’t be in this conference and time to drop down a level.
 

KT8813

Senior
Nov 23, 2016
677
672
93
What’s more embarrassing? Losing by 50 to a team that will win by 50 at least 5 times this year or losing to Tulane in year 10?
Didn't Schiano's defense give up a ton of points just last week to Oregon State? With OSUs talent? What would happen with a lesser squad?

Idon't know after all he did give up 3 this weekend! Now stop the obvious hating we all know your agenda.
 

vkj91

Heisman
Feb 7, 2007
188,318
49,438
98
Yes, we’d win recruiting wars.
Is that important?
No we wouldn’t win recruiting wars. I was referring to your assumption people would be excited for a few months. He couldn’t win recruiting wars against wanny and Pitt. Hell, with similar or better facilities to our peers I think Greg finished better than 3rd one time in recruiting against crappy big east schools. But now, oh now, we are gonna out recruit the big boys. Come on zap. I know you go through negative Phases and this is one of them. Let’s revisit this in 5 or 6 weeks.
Not to mention, you guys over estimate the relationship he has/had with local HS coaches.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: redking

vkj91

Heisman
Feb 7, 2007
188,318
49,438
98
Idon't know after all he did give up 3 this weekend! Now stop the obvious hating we all know your agenda.
Sorry bud but giving up 55 to Iowa with his talent would be like us giving up 55 to Norfolk state. Go count how many times he’s given up 30 plus while at OSU. Then do the same for ash and his tenure. Someday you guys will understand it’s ok to criticize the man but still respect what he did here.
 

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
37,312
58,611
113
Greg Schiano does not want to come back to Rutgers. He sees his career as being on an upward trajectory and taking the head coaching job at Rutgers is a giant step back for him. He wants a head coaching position however, he knows from first hand experience Rutgers is never going to be in a position to invest what is truly necessary to get the football program headed in the right direction.

Even if Rutgers decided to pay a top-flight coach $4-5 million/year, that is only the tip of the iceberg. The Athletic Department does not have the administrative resources (personnel or support) in place to support the program you’re all hoping for. The issues are financial, systemic and they run deep.
Where exactly is this magical P5 job that wants him be? You see the school actually has to want him as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MYHATINTHERING

RUnewjersey

Sophomore
Sep 21, 2016
111
108
0
Where exactly is this magical P5 job that wants him be? You see the school actually has to want him as well.

I didn’t say there was a P5 looking for Greg. I’m saying he is not going to leave OSU to take a backward step. Greg is smart enough to know Rutgers isn’t going to get it done. At this stage of his career he isn’t interested in another rebuild. He wants to take over somewhere he can win.
 

KT8813

Senior
Nov 23, 2016
677
672
93
Sorry bud but giving up 55 to Iowa with his talent would be like us giving up 55 to Norfolk state. Go count how many times he’s given up 30 plus while at OSU. Then do the same for ash and his tenure. Someday you guys will understand it’s ok to criticize the man but still respect what he did here.

First not your bud. Second admitting you hate (or strongly dislike) the man is your first step to recovery and ability to read a Schiano thread objectively. But you won't so have a nice season and bring a calculator to the games.
 

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
37,312
58,611
113
I didn’t say there was a P5 looking for Greg. I’m saying he is not going to leave OSU to take a backward step. Greg is smart enough to know Rutgers isn’t going to get it done. At this stage of his career he isn’t interested in another rebuild. He wants to take over somewhere he can win.
What would be considered a forward step? An established P5 school in the top 30? Certainly a G5 school wouldn't be considered a step forward would it? He was willing to take over Tennessee coming off a 4-8 record, I consider that a rebuild. They're not ready to win right now and are proving that after getting blown out by WVU. I'm just wondering what these limited steps up would be? If this is truly how he feels he might just be waiting a long, long time for that perfect opportunity.
 

vkj91

Heisman
Feb 7, 2007
188,318
49,438
98
First not your bud. Second admitting you hate (or strongly dislike) the man is your first step to recovery and ability to read a Schiano thread objectively. But you won't so have a nice season and bring a calculator to the games.
Don’t hate or dislike the man. Have spoken to him many times. What have I said that is factually incorrect?
 

RUnewjersey

Sophomore
Sep 21, 2016
111
108
0
What would be considered a forward step? An established P5 school in the top 30? Certainly a G5 school wouldn't be considered a step forward would it? He was willing to take over Tennessee coming off a 4-8 record, I consider that a rebuild. They're not ready to win right now and are proving that after getting blown out by WVU. I'm just wondering what these limited steps up would be? If this is truly how he feels he might just be waiting a long, long time for that perfect opportunity.

I consider a rebuild a program with a broken infrastructure, no support, and no history of winning and broken recruiting relationships.

I feel a Tennessee is a exactly what Greg would want. It’s a well established brand name, the facilities are the top tier, and the Athletic Department I university have money. He could turn Tennessee around in 2-3 years. Rutgers needs a lot of work before they’ll be competitive.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
74,993
91,781
103
To me, any head coaching job in a P5 conference is a step up.
Greg is not Bud Foster, he has a giant ego and I’m sure being the boss is important to him.
I disagree with anyone who thinks the DC job at any school is above a head coaching position at any P 5 school.
Don’t you people understand no AD will take a chance on him regardless how much they may like him, the political fallout from Tennessee is to much to overcome.
Rutgers is the only chance he has to be the boss again.
He’ll be waiting his entire life for another HC job other than here because it ain’t happening
 

REDRICH65

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2010
2,773
2,186
113
His teams were exciting to watch with anticipation for every game. During his time here the Big East had several teams that were in the top 25 at a time. The B1G had several boring years save for OSU and Michigan. Greg has seen and done a lot more since he was here. Older and wiser with a rep today's kids would respect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TonyVolt

vkj91

Heisman
Feb 7, 2007
188,318
49,438
98
What would be considered a forward step? An established P5 school in the top 30? Certainly a G5 school wouldn't be considered a step forward would it? He was willing to take over Tennessee coming off a 4-8 record, I consider that a rebuild. They're not ready to win right now and are proving that after getting blown out by WVU. I'm just wondering what these limited steps up would be? If this is truly how he feels he might just be waiting a long, long time for that perfect opportunity.
Tennessee was not a rebuild, it has state of the art everything, tons of money, and a team loaded with 4 stars.
 

vkj91

Heisman
Feb 7, 2007
188,318
49,438
98
I’ll leave this argument with this:
Career head coaching record
68-67
In conference record of 28-48. Only 500 after his breakout year.
In 11 years he finished better than 4th 3 times. Only once after his breakout year.
11-21 NFL record
In two years at OSU he has given up 30 or more points 4 times including 55 to Iowa.
He turned us around. A top flight head coach he is not. Look, I wouldn’t cry if he came back but if he came back right after Flood the results would be the same to date.
 

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
His teams were exciting to watch with anticipation for every game. During his time here the Big East had several teams that were in the top 25 at a time. The B1G had several boring years save for OSU and Michigan. Greg has seen and done a lot more since he was here. Older and wiser with a rep today's kids would respect.

Clearly you missed the Sanu Wildcat and Jabu Lovelace years. This tendency to inflate the past is why too many posters remember the Schiano era as being better than it was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking

RUBand

Senior
Aug 4, 2001
1,730
520
0
Greg Schiano does not want to come back to Rutgers. He sees his career as being on an upward trajectory and taking the head coaching job at Rutgers is a giant step back for him. He wants a head coaching position however, he knows from first hand experience Rutgers is never going to be in a position to invest what is truly necessary to get the football program headed in the right direction.

Even if Rutgers decided to pay a top-flight coach $4-5 million/year, that is only the tip of the iceberg. The Athletic Department does not have the administrative resources (personnel or support) in place to support the program you’re all hoping for. The issues are financial, systemic and they run deep.
Sad, but true. Perhaps one day this will change.
 

TonyVolt

Senior
Nov 12, 2015
580
941
0
Clearly you missed the Sanu Wildcat and Jabu Lovelace years. This tendency to inflate the past is why too many posters remember the Schiano era as being better than it was.

It was better than the crap they’re putting out there today, that’s for sure.
 

BlockR

Heisman
Dec 28, 2015
22,062
20,843
113
I’ll leave this argument with this:
Career head coaching record
68-67
In conference record of 28-48. Only 500 after his breakout year.
In 11 years he finished better than 4th 3 times. Only once after his breakout year.
11-21 NFL record
In two years at OSU he has given up 30 or more points 4 times including 55 to Iowa.
He turned us around. A top flight head coach he is not. Look, I wouldn’t cry if he came back but if he came back right after Flood the results would be the same to date.
we have a never been HC now who has three losses to OSU by a 163 to 3 margin,three times over 50pt beat downs,and thats improvement??
Ash posts a loss to kansas and Buffalo then Hobbs needs to have serious considerations of replacing Ash. Losing to Kansas alone will show there is zero progress..
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking

BlockR

Heisman
Dec 28, 2015
22,062
20,843
113
Sorry bud but giving up 55 to Iowa with his talent would be like us giving up 55 to Norfolk state. Go count how many times he’s given up 30 plus while at OSU. Then do the same for ash and his tenure. Someday you guys will understand it’s ok to criticize the man but still respect what he did here.
wake me up when Ash ever beats a ranked team,takes RU to a bowl game,wins a bowl game,has RU ranked.. Lets see if Ash can beat Kansas and mighty Buffalo.
Doubtful he will ever achieve any of those benchmarks at RU. It starts with recruiting and Ash is not a good recruiting HC,nor is he a closer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TonyVolt

RU4Real

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,955
30,733
0
So that settles it because you weighed in:D

I don't really give a f*ck whether anyone thinks it's "settled" or not. Clearly it's a religious issue and nobody's mind is going to be changed. So do not for second think that I'm actually trying to do that.

The guy was a solid program builder, a moderately above average recruiter and a piss-poor game day coach.

We don't need a program builder. We need a great recruiter and a very good game day coach.

Incidentally... I notice that the hard-core Garyphiles are, for the most part, the same as the hard-core Trumpers.

Some people are enamored of demagoguery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
74,993
91,781
103
I don't really give a f*ck whether anyone thinks it's "settled" or not. Clearly it's a religious issue and nobody's mind is going to be changed. So do not for second think that I'm actually trying to do that.

The guy was a solid program builder, a moderately above average recruiter and a piss-poor game day coach.

We don't need a program builder. We need a great recruiter and a very good game day coach.

Incidentally... I notice that the hard-core Garyphiles are, for the most part, the same as the hard-core Trumpers.

Some people are enamored of demagoguery.
Mad much!
Take a f’n chill pill dude
 
  • Like
Reactions: TonyVolt
Apr 24, 2015
613
603
57
I don't really give a f*ck whether anyone thinks it's "settled" or not. Clearly it's a religious issue and nobody's mind is going to be changed. So do not for second think that I'm actually trying to do that.

The guy was a solid program builder, a moderately above average recruiter and a piss-poor game day coach.

We don't need a program builder. We need a great recruiter and a very good game day coach.

Incidentally... I notice that the hard-core Garyphiles are, for the most part, the same as the hard-core Trumpers.

Some people are enamored of demagoguery.
Bad generalization
 

RU_DIO

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
16,872
17,103
113
I find it so weird that people are against GS after watching terrible football for the last 5 years. And find it weirder that people think we will never win in our lifetime.
 
Oct 17, 2007
69,704
47,621
0
Well sh$t he squeaked by a sun belt team with a winning record a decade in. Let’s build a statue. Yes we made third rate bowls for finishing 3rd and 4th in a watered down Big East. You guys are crying about Ash. schiano managed to give up 55 points as DC at OSU. But he’d make us respectable against the big boys. Too rich.

I know reading and not trolling aren't strengths of yours, but I specifically said I'm not upset with Ash about yesterday not expecting to beat tOSU at this time.

But shrieking about Schiano is laughable. He's lost, what, one-two games a year as DC?

Want to play the comparison game, let us know when Michigan scores 78 on tOSU...or anyone...
 
Oct 17, 2007
69,704
47,621
0
Yes, we’d win recruiting wars.
Is that important?

It's really fascinating how the people who cry that GS gave up 55 points in a season where as DC he lost one game, can't pick cherries like the fact that we beat out tOSU for Anthony Davis and the Cult for countless players while in the BE with GS at the helm. Meanwhile these days other than perhaps Maryland which is a program in severe disarray we're not beating out conference foes on the recruiting trail with any kind of regularity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlockR