They're right
Talking heads at ESPN say " WVU you have to beat someone first". Before you are in any conversation
We beat no one. Sure the ranking system is flawed but the premise doesn't change if we were unranked or preseason top 5. We have to beat quality teams, we haven't so far. BYU might be a 6-6 type of bowl team, Mizzou may not win a conference game.
OK, let's put it this way.
Give any team this schedule over its last 9 games:
Texas Tech W
Texas W (by 18)
@Kansas W (by 49)
Iowa State W (by 24)
@Kansas State L (by 1, thought by many to be Coach Snyder's finale)
@* Arizona State W ('neutral' site in the opponent's city)
Missouri W (by 15)
Youngstown State W
(N) BYU W
That is 8-1, one play from 9-0...
Loser by 18 to WVU Texas was anointed for the playoffs after having beaten now 1-3 Notre Dame.
Not one single AP vote for WVU last week.
Arizona State now getting more votes than WVU in both polls. Finished 6-7 last year. Could not beat WVU in Phoenix.
Many WVU fans have learned to believe that the Mountaineers deserve routine disrespect, disparate treatment and disparagement.
Don't git above yer raisin', yokels!
What does last year have to do with this year? We may or may not deserve to be ranked, but it doesn't matter we have to beat OU, BU, Texas, and TCU to make the playoff. If we're not in the playoff who really cares what # the AP decides to put next to our name? 1-4 are all that matter.
I think last year means a lot to the pollsters when it comes to Arizona State.....cause we return our weapons on offense (as ASU did), and their defense is worse than 75% of all teams out there. So.....why do they get the nod over WVU in the polls????
Beat two new coaches and an FCS school, beat Synder and okTalking heads at ESPN say " WVU you have to beat someone first". Before you are in any conversation
Tell them to go blow Notre Dame as they have every pre season rankings. There knowledge is for ****.Talking heads at ESPN say " WVU you have to beat someone first". Before you are in any conversation
Whole thread seems like a crybaby festival to me...just keep winning already.I thought we hated ESPN?? ....yet we yearn for their attention.
Kind of sad in the same way (yet not as serious) as a physically abused child that still craves the approval/attention of his/her parents.
Whole thread seems like a crybaby festival to me...just keep winning already.
Agree 100%.History serves us better the longer we stay under the radar.
Well Buck...as I said. WIN . Psychological disadvantage my ***.B.S.
Every other school is getting noticed. Being talked about. Having highlights shown. Being seen BY RECRUITS that can change future fortunes.
WVU being disrespected and people talking about the FACT is not "crying"--its discussing a real problem--the "psychological disadvantage" OU's president brought up.
Other schools are LOSING and have no better resume than WVU at this point-but are ranked and will remain ranked.
Its not good--its bad for WVU. WVU is one of a very few programs that must win half the season or more to be ranked.
The polls are extremely biased in favor of certain schools and conferences and this will determine who is in major bowls, playoffs, who gets the top recruits etc.
B.S.
Every other school is getting noticed. Being talked about. Having highlights shown. Being seen BY RECRUITS that can change future fortunes.
WVU being disrespected and people talking about the FACT is not "crying"--its discussing a real problem--the "psychological disadvantage" OU's president brought up.
Other schools are LOSING and have no better resume than WVU at this point-but are ranked and will remain ranked.
Its not good--its bad for WVU. WVU is one of a very few programs that must win half the season or more to be ranked.
The polls are extremely biased in favor of certain schools and conferences and this will determine who is in major bowls, playoffs, who gets the top recruits etc.
B.S.
Every other school is getting noticed. Being talked about. Having highlights shown. Being seen BY RECRUITS that can change future fortunes.
WVU being disrespected and people talking about the FACT is not "crying"--its discussing a real problem--the "psychological disadvantage" OU's president brought up.
Other schools are LOSING and have no better resume than WVU at this point-but are ranked and will remain ranked.
Its not good--its bad for WVU. WVU is one of a very few programs that must win half the season or more to be ranked.
The polls are extremely biased in favor of certain schools and conferences and this will determine who is in major bowls, playoffs, who gets the top recruits etc.
I think last year means a lot to the pollsters when it comes to Arizona State.....cause we return our weapons on offense (as ASU did), and their defense is worse than 75% of all teams out there. So.....why do they get the nod over WVU in the polls????
Well Buck...as I said. WIN . Psychological disadvantage my ***.
I thought we hated ESPN?? ....yet we yearn for their attention.
Kind of sad in the same way (yet not as serious) as a physically abused child that still craves the approval/attention of his/her parents.
Hey how bout some Xs and Os from you for once. Do you know anything about football or just satisfied being the local trouble making prick?
All those posts and only 31 likes. Odd.
...and the closet I've seen you get to X's and O's is the post where you just whined about somebody not writing about them.
Not my home board. Why would I get likes. I just grew up a WVU fan as well. I follow two teams closely. WVU is my second. .
OK Buck...yes let's think before posting...right when you tell me how BYU is a Power 5 at this current juncture first. I'll wait ...glad you're awake.3-0 is not winning? SINCE WHEN IS 3-0 with TWO P5 caliber wins NOT winning?
Do some of you even think before posting?
Still waiting for someone to answer who in the top 25 WOULD NOT BE RANKED with WVUs exact results? WVU has played better than some of these schools and just as impressive opponents, but they will have to have half a season or more wins compared to some schools one or two just to be ranked? WHY????
Psychological Disadvantage--same reason 2-2 OU with losses to top two Ohio State and top six Houston ISN'T ranked, but somehow, Ole Miss still is? and in the top 20 to boot?
Wake UP.
3-0 is not winning? SINCE WHEN IS 3-0 with TWO P5 caliber wins NOT winning?
Do some of you even think before posting?
Still waiting for someone to answer who in the top 25 WOULD NOT BE RANKED with WVUs exact results? WVU has played better than some of these schools and just as impressive opponents, but they will have to have half a season or more wins compared to some schools one or two just to be ranked? WHY????
Psychological Disadvantage--same reason 2-2 OU with losses to top two Ohio State and top six Houston ISN'T ranked, but somehow, Ole Miss still is? and in the top 20 to boot?
Wake UP.
OK Buck...yes let's think before posting...right when you tell me how BYU is a Power 5 at this current juncture first. I'll wait ...glad you're awake.
We beat no one. Sure the ranking system is flawed but the premise doesn't change if we were unranked or preseason top 5. We have to beat quality teams, we haven't so far. BYU might be a 6-6 type of bowl team, Mizzou may not win a conference game.
What does last year have to do with this year? We may or may not deserve to be ranked, but it doesn't matter we have to beat OU, BU, Texas, and TCU to make the playoff. If we're not in the playoff who really cares what # the AP decides to put next to our name? 1-4 are all that matter.
We are getting all of the respect we are due to this point.Talking heads at ESPN say " WVU you have to beat someone first". Before you are in any conversation
We are getting all of the respect we are due to this point.