Gary Parrish on NCAA and immunity

[johnson86-1]

Those shitheads also forget that one of their own squealed on us about 12 years ago. This is not some unprecedented deal, what likely happened is they suspect a severe violation took place and the school keeps giving them the runaround. If it's discovered the school/coach lied, that school/coach is in major ****.

The Devinner situation was no where near 12 years ago.

 

[Strike.sixpack]

I was curious about the possible ramifications of the immunity issue so I did the logical thing: I asked someone who could give me a valid, and non-biased answer. So, I asked a family friend who is a Div. 1 head coach about it. Regarding the immunity issue, his words were "granting immunity is the NCAA's ultimate power-play" and is utilized only rarely by them. When used, the school on the receiving end of it are "in deep ****".

Yep. Our friends to the north believe the NCAA is using it as a final last ditch effort to find something. When in actuality it's used to put the big red bow and final touches on what they already know the school and/or coaches may have lied, covered up, etc. significant major violations. They just need to corroborate what they have discovered. They are NOT trying to dig up a violation with immunity. They already know a major stinking turd of a violation has occurred. They just want to clean it up because turning a big pile of misinformation diarrhea from UM to the COI just makes you feel so unclean. Clean that baby up and put a bow on it.

 

[patdog]

I don't think even Bruiser believes that. He knows this is going to end very badly for them. But he's going to toe the party line right down to the bitter end.

 

[drt7891]

No one from OM was offered immunity in the Redmond case. I was talking about Doug Buckles in the 2003-04 investigation (there were a few others that went to other schools, as well). He was offered immunity in that deal.

 

[coach66]

Clarify, who is on the receiving end.

nm

 

[drt7891]

I was told the same thing by a close friend. They only do it when they know something happened, the school won't give it to them, and they want to get to the bottom of it.

 

[Dolphus Raymond]

"On the receiving end" the school that is the target of the NCAA /who's investigation necessitated that the NCAA offer immunity. In this case receiving end= Ole Miss.

 

[Junction John]

Unless you're completely full of ****, I approve this first post*

I was curious about the possible ramifications of the immunity issue so I did the logical thing: I asked someone who could give me a valid, and non-biased answer. So, I asked a family friend who is a Div. 1 head coach about it. Regarding the immunity issue, his words were "granting immunity is the NCAA's ultimate power-play" and is utilized only rarely by them. When used, the school on the receiving end of it are "in deep ****".

especially the 'deep ****' part.

 

[coach66]

Ok, agree.

Mm