Toggle sidebar

Game Thread: Northwestern vs. Michigan

TheC

TheC

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
19,249
1,353
62
7-3 at half would be much different than 14-3. Need a stop here.
 
F

Fanaticat98

Senior
May 29, 2001
9,095
709
113
Ok if we couldn’t get that break on a near sack lame duck throw, we’re not winning this game. What should have been 80% probability a sack, fumble, INT or 4th down, is a first down conversion. Whoa! That play negates it!
 
F

Fanaticat98

Senior
May 29, 2001
9,095
709
113
Missed opportunity. Taking the lead would’ve been huge going into half. Should’ve sold out for that by running on 3rd down with a plan to go for it on 4th, then it takes more time off the clock and/or forced Mich to hurn more time outs. Giving them 1:00 when they complete 8-15 yard passes every few seconds, they’re going to score again. Maybe a pick six?
 
N

NorthwesternFan51234

Freshman
Oct 11, 2025
92
53
17
TheC said:
7-3 at half would be much different than 14-3. Need a stop here.
Click to expand...

Fanaticat98 said:
Missed opportunity. Taking the lead would’ve been huge going into half. Should’ve sold out for that by running on 3rd down with a plan to go for it on 4th, then it takes more time off the clock and/or forced Mich to hurn more time outs. Giving them 1:00 when they complete 8-15 yard passes every few seconds, they’re going to score again. Maybe a pick six?
Click to expand...
It was terrible coaching.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Wildcat Report

Latest

  1. 01 NIL Northwestern's Mark Jackson: New Ryan Field can put Wildcats in 'new stratosphere' of revenue generation
  2. 02 Wildcat Report Ten Questions: 7. Will the Cats be better in the red zone?
  3. 03 Edgy Tim Osterhues is a name to watch
  4. 04 Rivals Nation's No. 3 OT Cannon Zubeck maps out busy fall as top contenders emerge
  5. 05 Wildcat Report Northwestern announces $35 million donation to the football program from the Uihleins
Top Bottom