Fun Team To Watch

Loyal-Son

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2016
1,447
2,746
81
I am sorry but is what is “fun” about watching 3 competitive nailbiters out of 4 games vs Q4 cupcakes the highest ranked being #282?

Pikiell hasn’t proved anybody wrong. All signs point to the team being just as bad as everything thought.
Nailbiters?

Were you watching the same games I was? Lots of teams have had games a lot closer than any of ours.

In addition, we have had past tournament teams LOSE some games against "cupcakes" like these.

I have no idea how this team will play when we get to the "big boys", but they have been fun to watch so far.

It is disgusting to me to see people who call themselves Rutgers fans keep denigrating everything this team does.
 

Atlasxal

Sophomore
Mar 7, 2025
83
123
30
It is ALWAYS fun to watch RU win, unless the team is really, really miserable to watch. They have not been really miserable to watch this season so far. So .. 4 fun games to date!

And frankly, other than the American game, none of the games were ever really in doubt, just the margin of victory. And even the American game, after RU tied them at the end of the 1st half, I was pretty confident - and when RU went up 45-35 to start the 2nd half (a 15-2 run), RU was never really horribly threatened. Yeah, American got to within 5 towards the end - but never had the ball with a chance to make it a one-possession game, and RU hit their FT's to put it away.

I cannot remember if it was in this thread, or another, but one poster was complaining that it too a strong FT shooting game to beat a low level team ... like they were complaining a=that RU shot FT's in quantity and well in this game! And if RU had shot FT's poorly, they would have said "See, I told you RU sucked" - even if RU had win the game but with poor FT shooting!

Look, RU has a ton of question marks still, looks like they are short talent relative to mist of the other Big Ten teams, and do look like they could get blown out a few times, and struggle in the Big Ten. But ... stranger things have happened. I still see a path to 14-16 overall wins. I admit that 12 wins seems more likely a downside than even 16 wins as an upside. But until they play the games? Who knows?

For example .. here are some "What If's":

1) What if ... Grant is actually a true break-out player, like the 2 Murray brothers were, or a number of other players were for other pas Big Ten teams ... and he can actually average 16 ppg, 7 rpg, with a good efficiency?

2) What if ... Davis can average 9-10 ppg, 4-5 apg, 42%+ FG, 35%+ 3-point shooting, and solid on-ball defense?

3) What if ... Francis can be acceptable defensively, even with his 6'0" or shorter height (like Jameer Young of Maryland, let's say) and average 12-14 ppg with an reaosnable offensive efficiency?

4) What if ... ONE of Badalau or Bichanan can be a reliable #3 scorer behind Grant and Francis? Or between them ONE is a #3 scorer in most games, alternating, ;et's say?

5) What if ... Nwuli gradually develops into an effective reserve, even if only defensively and rebounding? He showed much better, less lost, versus American than in the prior 3 games.

6) What if ... Fall and Dortch, combined, can deliver 15-18 mpg and provide 6-7 reb/g and solid help defense (both likely are too skinny to be too effective in solo post defense - i.e. without help - against any teams with decent post players)?

Agree. And the following part of your post is so true of comments from many posters who don’t recognize the positives, but only the negatives. Or who point out… had we not done this well, we would have lost. Such a pessimistic loser mentality.

“I cannot remember if it was in this thread, or another, but one poster was complaining that it took a strong FT shooting game to beat a low level team ... like they were complaining that RU shot FT's in quantity and well in this game! And if RU had shot FT's poorly, they would have said "See, I told you RU sucked" - even if RU had won the game but with poor FT shooting!”
 

S_Janowski

Heisman
May 24, 2009
13,903
26,494
113
I am sorry but is what is “fun” about watching 3 competitive nailbiters out of 4 games vs Q4 cupcakes the highest ranked being #282?

Pikiell hasn’t proved anybody wrong. All signs point to the team being just as bad as everything thought.

Your definition of nail biters is different than mine.

Nailbiter for me would be Arkansas barely beating Winthrop last night.
 

S_Janowski

Heisman
May 24, 2009
13,903
26,494
113
We don’t know how this team is going to translate as the competition ratchets up but damn this is a fun team to watch and root for so far. Love the usage of 11 players that each brings something to the table.

I‘m totally enjoying the type of basketball RU is playing this season moreso than last year’s team thus far.

Kudos to Coach Pike and staff for trying to prove the naysayers wrong.

GO RU

I’ve said multiple times since last season ended that I expect to enjoy this season more than last (reason why I kept my season tickets).

It was fun watching Dylan / Ace for a year but the overall team was not that enjoyable last year.

I expect this team to play hungrier and have much more to prove, defend and rebound better (hopefully).

We might not win as many games or have the entertainment of watching 2 lottery picks put up 20-30 pts. a game each but I’m looking forward to watching a young team grow and develop, play hard and hopefully knock off a few teams we’re not expected to beat.
 

FAT MOON

All-Conference
Mar 27, 2006
4,272
4,464
113
I've enjoyed watching this team. They play hard and have shown they're gonna compete hard all season. Good first step.

I do think they'll struggle against the top half of the B1G this season. To me I'm excited to see if they can show flashes like the 2018-2019 team did before making the leap the next year to a tournie level team. If they do, it will lead to a very important off season. If we can keep the core of the team together and add in an important piece from the portal (cough...a 5...cough) than we can get back to being dangerous/bubble type...if we see another mass exodus then sadly it's probably over for my favorite hoops coach ever (only started following late 90s).
 

littlenis5

Senior
Jun 21, 2004
1,472
985
113
yeah I wouldn't say "fun" myself but I do find them interesting. I am hoping Big O can hold his own come B1G play. I have always rooted for him and he has clearly put in the work to improve. Hopefully they can continue to gel and Pike shortens the bench. Grant is a player and Denis seems like a fairly heady guy out there even if so far not that "sniper" but fingers crossed there too. (he certainly doesn't stink).
He’s shooting a better percentage from 3 than Ron on similar volume for any year besides his senior year. He’s no Cam Spencer but who is.
 

littlenis5

Senior
Jun 21, 2004
1,472
985
113
Unselfish play? They averaged 12.9 assist per game last year and thru 4 games it is 13.3. Did you see Buchanan pass the ball 1 time? These guys still play 1 on 1 for the most part but I will give you they do seem more "team" oriented and don't appear to have the me players (except #5 as noted above). But at least he does play hard.
Watch the games…the assist numbers were fine last year because Dylan is Dylan…but the ball isn’t stopping throughout the possession this year* the same way it did last year

*Except for Buchanan, whose defense doesn’t seem to warrant this current ball stopping when he’s not at all scoring well. Hopefully this is a Jacob Young situation where by January he figures out how to make layups and suddenly he’s important
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

RUfan1977

Senior
Mar 24, 2024
446
742
93
It definitely is a lot more fun to watch a team overachieve than under achieve. Looking at all the quality players the other Big Ten teams brought in winning in this league will be no easy task. However, there are a number of positive signs that give some glimmers of hope.

The biggest surprise is how much the returning players have improved. In particular, Grant and Ogbole have far exceeded expectations. Dortch also brings energy and can defend, rebound and dunk. Davis is solid and doesn’t turn the ball over very much. Francis has also far exceeded expectations and has been a good pickup at guard as has Buchanan. Badalau has showed promise and doesn’t play like a freshman, Nwuli and Mark both show promise but play like freshman. The biggest issue is getting all of them to up their defensive intensity, which is something Pikiel has done on the past. It isn’t a given that this team will be bad. It needs to stay healthy and greatly exceed expectations, but so far Rutgers looks like it’s heading in the right direction.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,642
38,123
113
It definitely is a lot more fun to watch a team overachieve than under achieve. Looking at all the quality players the other Big Ten teams brought in winning in this league will be no easy task. However, there are a number of positive signs that give some glimmers of hope.

The biggest surprise is how much the returning players have improved. In particular, Grant and Ogbole have far exceeded expectations. Dortch also brings energy and can defend, rebound and dunk. Davis is solid and doesn’t turn the ball over very much. Francis has also far exceeded expectations and has been a good pickup at guard as has Buchanan. Badalau has showed promise and doesn’t play like a freshman, Nwuli and Mark both show promise but play like freshman. The biggest issue is getting all of them to up their defensive intensity, which is something Pikiel has done on the past. It isn’t a given that this team will be bad. It needs to stay healthy and greatly exceed expectations, but so far Rutgers looks like it’s heading in the right direction.

Hoping this team looks like the 22-23 Nebraska team that rounded into form just as we played them in February. Started out 3-9 in conference and finished 6-2.

Though if be happier not going 3-9 to start
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,087
12,428
78
Watch the games…the assist numbers were fine last year because Dylan is Dylan…but the ball isn’t stopping throughout the possession this year* the same way it did last year

*Except for Buchanan, whose defense doesn’t seem to warrant this current ball stopping when he’s not at all scoring well. Hopefully this is a Jacob Young situation where by January he figures out how to make layups and suddenly he’s important

The biggest upside I see with Buchanan so far this season has been that he finishes in transition. We did a poor job of creating transition opportunities though vs American and Lehigh. That needs to improve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC1984

Mholinko

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2023
1,399
2,150
77
I won’t really even get hung up on how we look against Tennessee or the 3rd opponent in Vegas

to me the notre dame game will give us the best bit of information as to what this team actually is

notre dame is a similarly average on paper power conference team who we have recent history against and will give a solid idea if we’re ready to be competitive against big ten mid to bottom tier teams or if we’re more likely the actual bottom

if you told me we’d be 9-3 going into January and beat notre dame seton hall all the cupcakes and lost the other games I think that’s a reasonable hope
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,566
10,714
78
I am sorry but is what is “fun” about watching 3 competitive nailbiters out of 4 games vs Q4 cupcakes the highest ranked being #282?

Pikiell hasn’t proved anybody wrong. All signs point to the team being just as bad as everything thought.
The reality is you will see what you are looking for. If you think they stink, you will find lots of that. If you are happy with what you see, you are looking at the positives. If you ask an expert, they would probably say the team looks better than expected but not sure that changes any of the projections. ESPN and other better services have Rutgers projected at 14-16 for the regular season and 6-14 in the Big Ten.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC1984

RU-ROCS

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
12,407
7,573
113
This is the ultimate problem. Before last night's game Pikiell had a 150-140 record in his 10th season to date. Obviously this season isn't over but that averages out to 15-14 every season. There have been 4 winning seasons and 5 losing seasons to date. There have been 2 trips to the NCAAs (1-1 and 0-1) and 1 trip to the NIT (0-1). We have had a winning conference record 2 times and a .500 conference record 2 times. I think that we can all agree that the past 3 seasons have been major disappointments. The team has regressed in the NIL age.
You are right about regression in the NIL era. But averaging wins over Pike's 10 years is not fair and ignores the deep hole RU was in then he took the job. He really had the program headed in the right direction as a developmental program until NIL came around. Having said that, with NIL the game may have passed Pike by. Even with more money, teams have constant turnover making it hard to run a complicated defensive system and to develop players in that system.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,642
38,123
113
Paul and Cam left in May. Hard to blame Pike on that.

That was the team with Cam and Paul - but lack of depth behind Mawot killed us. Lack of depth is a fair criticism of Pike and an area we need to improve. Hard to have equivalent or even close depth behind Dylan Harper, but we need to be more resilient when an injury happens.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,642
38,123
113
You are right about regression in the NIL era. But averaging wins over Pike's 10 years is not fair and ignores the deep hole RU was in then he took the job. He really had the program headed in the right direction as a developmental program until NIL came around. Having said that, with NIL the game may have passed Pike by. Even with more money, teams have constant turnover making it hard to run a complicated defensive system and to develop players in that system.

Agreed. I live Pike and hope he can adapt - but when your biggest talent is developing players into legit major players and that skill is less important…

At the same time, the school needs to get its *** in gear. If Pike can’t adapt or has just run out of answers, a solid coach isn’t going to jump into the same piss poor NIL situation.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,062
15,445
72
Agree. And the following part of your post is so true of comments from many posters who don’t recognize the positives, but only the negatives. Or who point out… had we not done this well, we would have lost. Such a pessimistic loser mentality.

“I cannot remember if it was in this thread, or another, but one poster was complaining that it took a strong FT shooting game to beat a low level team ... like they were complaining that RU shot FT's in quantity and well in this game! And if RU had shot FT's poorly, they would have said "See, I told you RU sucked" - even if RU had won the game but with poor FT shooting!”
Agree, and just to add some context about FTs:

If we take 16 shots from the field and make 2-6 (33%) from the arc and 5-10 (50%) from 2-point range, we get 16 points.

If we get fouled 16 times in the act of shooting, we only have to make 50% of 32 shots from the line to match the above total, so it’s like shooting 33% from 3 and 50% from 2.

If we make 63% from the line in that scenario, we score 20 points, which is like 2-6 (33%) from 3 plus 7-10 (70%) from 2.

For me, 63% is the critical percentage to meet or exceed at the line without it costing you the game, because it’s still likely to be as good or better than what you would have shot from the field, had you not been fouled.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Atlasxal

DHajekRC1984

Senior
Jul 20, 2025
1,035
926
113
These are all narratives and mental gymnastics made up by fans who look for any and all excuses to be “positive” for the sake of “just being positive”.

Just like the “this is a scrappy defense first Pikiell roster now!” narrative. Funny…I watched American get uncontested open shots at will in the first half last night.

Bottom line is….its year 10. The team can’t handily beat teams ranked 300 in Kenpom at home. All objective signs point to it being very difficult to get to a 500 record. In year 10.

Yeah, not fun.
I'll tell you 1 thing.. those two end of half plays where the ball was thrown over the top (1h) and then that guard drove uncontested to the rim (2h) were terrible defense. Both of those shots should have been made by Ametican for 4 more points. If you dont focus at those times
He’s shooting a better percentage from 3 than Ron on similar volume for any year besides his senior year. He’s no Cam Spencer but who is.

He’s shooting a better percentage from 3 than Ron on similar volume for any year besides his senior year. He’s no Cam Spencer but who is.
4 games lol.

My new 6 cylinder Toyata SUV is getting 22 mph..vs. the 18.5 my previous Acura 6 cylinder got. Just happens that I only drove the new car home via I-95 vs. The 20 years in the old car.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38

DHajekRC1984

Senior
Jul 20, 2025
1,035
926
113
Watch the games…the assist numbers were fine last year because Dylan is Dylan…but the ball isn’t stopping throughout the possession this year* the same way it did last year

*Except for Buchanan, whose defense doesn’t seem to warrant this current ball stopping when he’s not at all scoring well. Hopefully this is a Jacob Young situation where by January he figures out how to make layups and suddenly he’s important
???? I think that is pretty much exactly what I said. The poster said we were sharing the ball more. I pointed out the asst. Numbers were near the same vs. last year. (so far).
 

DHajekRC1984

Senior
Jul 20, 2025
1,035
926
113
Paul and Cam left in May. Hard to blame Pike on that.
Give you a like for the post prior and bs for this position. Have debated this before. Perhaps Cam used Pike ..check. But Pike pushed Paul off the ball and was completely ignorant to the implications. Nor could he have creatively come up with a way to get Paul back on the roster when he wanted back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

Mholinko

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2023
1,399
2,150
77
Agreed. I live Pike and hope he can adapt - but when your biggest talent is developing players into legit major players and that skill is less important…

At the same time, the school needs to get its *** in gear. If Pike can’t adapt or has just run out of answers, a solid coach isn’t going to jump into the same piss poor NIL situation.
I agree with OP and your reply entirely

Rutgers needs to take a long look in the mirror at the end of the day as to what type of athletic department not just basketball program that it wants to be

the landscape is the landscape and trying to create a winning scenario in revenue sports where NIL and portal chaos aren’t embraced is a losing proposition

You can win overnight now in college sports it just requires a different recipe than pike is an expert at

he is a program builder the old school way and it remains to be seen if that’s feasible at the major conference level in this day and age

if Rutgers had even a mid pack NIL Chest I think pike with his development abilities could do wonders but we don’t even have that
 

JFK20

All-Conference
Mar 8, 2003
2,936
4,004
113
Nailbiters?

Were you watching the same games I was? Lots of teams have had games a lot closer than any of ours.

In addition, we have had past tournament teams LOSE some games against "cupcakes" like these.

I have no idea how this team will play when we get to the "big boys", but they have been fun to watch so far.

It is disgusting to me to see people who call themselves Rutgers fans keep denigrating everything this team does.
It’s disgusting to me how much of this fanbase are losers who live in pollyanna lala land and who have no expectations and hold the program to zero accountability.
 

satnom

All-American
Jun 28, 2002
6,950
8,527
88
That was bad. Ton of missed shots, poor defense and substitution patterns were not good.

No bueno.

GO RU
 

ScarletJocko

Senior
Nov 25, 2019
189
582
93
Well, the good news is it only took 5 games for the fans that have chosen to live in LaLa Land about the state of this program to come crashing back to earth
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38

biazza38

Heisman
Nov 18, 2012
14,427
17,472
81
At least with football we have some NFL bound players and even the biggest GS fans (myself being one of them) are honest about the defense.
Saying this is a “fun team to watch” prior to tonight is just straight delusional. Yes, it’s so much fun trotting out a team with almost no B1G players
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUbyRED

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,301
1,809
42
Yeah. Watching since ‘92 (freshmen year).

Newbie? lol.

Quality of opponent is what it is. Team effort travels and translates.

GO RU
The team is awful. Effort yes but undersized, out matched, and out coached. Watch our offensive sets vs our opponents it’s laughable.

Wait on how bad it gets!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Magoo1

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,301
1,809
42
It’s not really fair to include his first 3 seasons in that metric.

But he does need to get better, quickly.
Ok throw them out! Pike peaked during Covid and has been in a downward spiral every year since. Crashing into a Moutainside last year. The only reason he is still coaching is RU refuses to act like a true power 4 school.