You should be an expert on "loser mentality", since you and you up-voters fit the definition of one to a tee.We just keep setting the bar lower. Loser mentality.
You should be an expert on "loser mentality", since you and you up-voters fit the definition of one to a tee.We just keep setting the bar lower. Loser mentality.
Nailbiters?I am sorry but is what is “fun” about watching 3 competitive nailbiters out of 4 games vs Q4 cupcakes the highest ranked being #282?
Pikiell hasn’t proved anybody wrong. All signs point to the team being just as bad as everything thought.
lol, Go back to your parents’ basementYou should be an expert on "loser mentality", since you and you up-voters fit the definition of one to a tee.
It is ALWAYS fun to watch RU win, unless the team is really, really miserable to watch. They have not been really miserable to watch this season so far. So .. 4 fun games to date!
And frankly, other than the American game, none of the games were ever really in doubt, just the margin of victory. And even the American game, after RU tied them at the end of the 1st half, I was pretty confident - and when RU went up 45-35 to start the 2nd half (a 15-2 run), RU was never really horribly threatened. Yeah, American got to within 5 towards the end - but never had the ball with a chance to make it a one-possession game, and RU hit their FT's to put it away.
I cannot remember if it was in this thread, or another, but one poster was complaining that it too a strong FT shooting game to beat a low level team ... like they were complaining a=that RU shot FT's in quantity and well in this game! And if RU had shot FT's poorly, they would have said "See, I told you RU sucked" - even if RU had win the game but with poor FT shooting!
Look, RU has a ton of question marks still, looks like they are short talent relative to mist of the other Big Ten teams, and do look like they could get blown out a few times, and struggle in the Big Ten. But ... stranger things have happened. I still see a path to 14-16 overall wins. I admit that 12 wins seems more likely a downside than even 16 wins as an upside. But until they play the games? Who knows?
For example .. here are some "What If's":
1) What if ... Grant is actually a true break-out player, like the 2 Murray brothers were, or a number of other players were for other pas Big Ten teams ... and he can actually average 16 ppg, 7 rpg, with a good efficiency?
2) What if ... Davis can average 9-10 ppg, 4-5 apg, 42%+ FG, 35%+ 3-point shooting, and solid on-ball defense?
3) What if ... Francis can be acceptable defensively, even with his 6'0" or shorter height (like Jameer Young of Maryland, let's say) and average 12-14 ppg with an reaosnable offensive efficiency?
4) What if ... ONE of Badalau or Bichanan can be a reliable #3 scorer behind Grant and Francis? Or between them ONE is a #3 scorer in most games, alternating, ;et's say?
5) What if ... Nwuli gradually develops into an effective reserve, even if only defensively and rebounding? He showed much better, less lost, versus American than in the prior 3 games.
6) What if ... Fall and Dortch, combined, can deliver 15-18 mpg and provide 6-7 reb/g and solid help defense (both likely are too skinny to be too effective in solo post defense - i.e. without help - against any teams with decent post players)?
But were you or the pooch biting your nails?I was concerned up 6 with minutes to do, A 3 and its a 1 possession game. Surely it had to come across your thinking.
I am sorry but is what is “fun” about watching 3 competitive nailbiters out of 4 games vs Q4 cupcakes the highest ranked being #282?
Pikiell hasn’t proved anybody wrong. All signs point to the team being just as bad as everything thought.
We don’t know how this team is going to translate as the competition ratchets up but damn this is a fun team to watch and root for so far. Love the usage of 11 players that each brings something to the table.
I‘m totally enjoying the type of basketball RU is playing this season moreso than last year’s team thus far.
Kudos to Coach Pike and staff for trying to prove the naysayers wrong.
GO RU
Come on man. Going against two top 20 teams in games 6 and 7 (lol) isn’t going to tell us what this team will be in January or March.
He’s shooting a better percentage from 3 than Ron on similar volume for any year besides his senior year. He’s no Cam Spencer but who is.yeah I wouldn't say "fun" myself but I do find them interesting. I am hoping Big O can hold his own come B1G play. I have always rooted for him and he has clearly put in the work to improve. Hopefully they can continue to gel and Pike shortens the bench. Grant is a player and Denis seems like a fairly heady guy out there even if so far not that "sniper" but fingers crossed there too. (he certainly doesn't stink).
Watch the games…the assist numbers were fine last year because Dylan is Dylan…but the ball isn’t stopping throughout the possession this year* the same way it did last yearUnselfish play? They averaged 12.9 assist per game last year and thru 4 games it is 13.3. Did you see Buchanan pass the ball 1 time? These guys still play 1 on 1 for the most part but I will give you they do seem more "team" oriented and don't appear to have the me players (except #5 as noted above). But at least he does play hard.
It definitely is a lot more fun to watch a team overachieve than under achieve. Looking at all the quality players the other Big Ten teams brought in winning in this league will be no easy task. However, there are a number of positive signs that give some glimmers of hope.
The biggest surprise is how much the returning players have improved. In particular, Grant and Ogbole have far exceeded expectations. Dortch also brings energy and can defend, rebound and dunk. Davis is solid and doesn’t turn the ball over very much. Francis has also far exceeded expectations and has been a good pickup at guard as has Buchanan. Badalau has showed promise and doesn’t play like a freshman, Nwuli and Mark both show promise but play like freshman. The biggest issue is getting all of them to up their defensive intensity, which is something Pikiel has done on the past. It isn’t a given that this team will be bad. It needs to stay healthy and greatly exceed expectations, but so far Rutgers looks like it’s heading in the right direction.
Watch the games…the assist numbers were fine last year because Dylan is Dylan…but the ball isn’t stopping throughout the possession this year* the same way it did last year
*Except for Buchanan, whose defense doesn’t seem to warrant this current ball stopping when he’s not at all scoring well. Hopefully this is a Jacob Young situation where by January he figures out how to make layups and suddenly he’s important
The reality is you will see what you are looking for. If you think they stink, you will find lots of that. If you are happy with what you see, you are looking at the positives. If you ask an expert, they would probably say the team looks better than expected but not sure that changes any of the projections. ESPN and other better services have Rutgers projected at 14-16 for the regular season and 6-14 in the Big Ten.I am sorry but is what is “fun” about watching 3 competitive nailbiters out of 4 games vs Q4 cupcakes the highest ranked being #282?
Pikiell hasn’t proved anybody wrong. All signs point to the team being just as bad as everything thought.
Paul and Cam left in May. Hard to blame Pike on that.Fair but it was a 7 man rotation. Thats on Pike that the team completely fell apart without Mag and offensively was putrid
Roster and recruiting
You are right about regression in the NIL era. But averaging wins over Pike's 10 years is not fair and ignores the deep hole RU was in then he took the job. He really had the program headed in the right direction as a developmental program until NIL came around. Having said that, with NIL the game may have passed Pike by. Even with more money, teams have constant turnover making it hard to run a complicated defensive system and to develop players in that system.This is the ultimate problem. Before last night's game Pikiell had a 150-140 record in his 10th season to date. Obviously this season isn't over but that averages out to 15-14 every season. There have been 4 winning seasons and 5 losing seasons to date. There have been 2 trips to the NCAAs (1-1 and 0-1) and 1 trip to the NIT (0-1). We have had a winning conference record 2 times and a .500 conference record 2 times. I think that we can all agree that the past 3 seasons have been major disappointments. The team has regressed in the NIL age.
Paul and Cam left in May. Hard to blame Pike on that.
You are right about regression in the NIL era. But averaging wins over Pike's 10 years is not fair and ignores the deep hole RU was in then he took the job. He really had the program headed in the right direction as a developmental program until NIL came around. Having said that, with NIL the game may have passed Pike by. Even with more money, teams have constant turnover making it hard to run a complicated defensive system and to develop players in that system.
Agree, and just to add some context about FTs:Agree. And the following part of your post is so true of comments from many posters who don’t recognize the positives, but only the negatives. Or who point out… had we not done this well, we would have lost. Such a pessimistic loser mentality.
“I cannot remember if it was in this thread, or another, but one poster was complaining that it took a strong FT shooting game to beat a low level team ... like they were complaining that RU shot FT's in quantity and well in this game! And if RU had shot FT's poorly, they would have said "See, I told you RU sucked" - even if RU had won the game but with poor FT shooting!”
I'll tell you 1 thing.. those two end of half plays where the ball was thrown over the top (1h) and then that guard drove uncontested to the rim (2h) were terrible defense. Both of those shots should have been made by Ametican for 4 more points. If you dont focus at those timesThese are all narratives and mental gymnastics made up by fans who look for any and all excuses to be “positive” for the sake of “just being positive”.
Just like the “this is a scrappy defense first Pikiell roster now!” narrative. Funny…I watched American get uncontested open shots at will in the first half last night.
Bottom line is….its year 10. The team can’t handily beat teams ranked 300 in Kenpom at home. All objective signs point to it being very difficult to get to a 500 record. In year 10.
Yeah, not fun.
He’s shooting a better percentage from 3 than Ron on similar volume for any year besides his senior year. He’s no Cam Spencer but who is.
4 games lol.He’s shooting a better percentage from 3 than Ron on similar volume for any year besides his senior year. He’s no Cam Spencer but who is.
???? I think that is pretty much exactly what I said. The poster said we were sharing the ball more. I pointed out the asst. Numbers were near the same vs. last year. (so far).Watch the games…the assist numbers were fine last year because Dylan is Dylan…but the ball isn’t stopping throughout the possession this year* the same way it did last year
*Except for Buchanan, whose defense doesn’t seem to warrant this current ball stopping when he’s not at all scoring well. Hopefully this is a Jacob Young situation where by January he figures out how to make layups and suddenly he’s important
Give you a like for the post prior and bs for this position. Have debated this before. Perhaps Cam used Pike ..check. But Pike pushed Paul off the ball and was completely ignorant to the implications. Nor could he have creatively come up with a way to get Paul back on the roster when he wanted back.Paul and Cam left in May. Hard to blame Pike on that.
I agree with OP and your reply entirelyAgreed. I live Pike and hope he can adapt - but when your biggest talent is developing players into legit major players and that skill is less important…
At the same time, the school needs to get its *** in gear. If Pike can’t adapt or has just run out of answers, a solid coach isn’t going to jump into the same piss poor NIL situation.
Me. I'm the one with 4 paws. I was biting those annoying nails on the side of my paw. Still don't know what they are for.But were you or the pooch biting your nails?
It’s disgusting to me how much of this fanbase are losers who live in pollyanna lala land and who have no expectations and hold the program to zero accountability.Nailbiters?
Were you watching the same games I was? Lots of teams have had games a lot closer than any of ours.
In addition, we have had past tournament teams LOSE some games against "cupcakes" like these.
I have no idea how this team will play when we get to the "big boys", but they have been fun to watch so far.
It is disgusting to me to see people who call themselves Rutgers fans keep denigrating everything this team does.
Or spelled backwards as in ive had NUF.
Sure will.
GO RU
The team is awful. Effort yes but undersized, out matched, and out coached. Watch our offensive sets vs our opponents it’s laughable.Yeah. Watching since ‘92 (freshmen year).
Newbie? lol.
Quality of opponent is what it is. Team effort travels and translates.
GO RU
Ok throw them out! Pike peaked during Covid and has been in a downward spiral every year since. Crashing into a Moutainside last year. The only reason he is still coaching is RU refuses to act like a true power 4 school.It’s not really fair to include his first 3 seasons in that metric.
But he does need to get better, quickly.