Frost is going nowhere

[Redscarlet]

Here you go. Original schedule included Michigan State.

we win the 3 games we won (Purdue, Penn State and Rutgers), beat Michigan State and win 2 out of 3 non conference games. That’s 6 games.

Now what team are you a fan of again?

Original schedule——- Late Covid 19 schedule

September 5 Home Purdue
October 3 Away Northwestern
October 10 Home Illinois
October 17 bye
October 24 Away Rutgers
October 31 Away Ohio St
November 7 Home PennSt
November 14 Away Ioway
November 21 Away Wisconsin
November 27 Home Minnesota

October 24 Away Ohio St
October 31 Home Wisconsin canceled
November 7 Away Northwestern
November 14 Home Penn St
November 21 Home Illinois
November 27 Away Ioway
December 5 Away Purdue
December 12 Home Minnesota
December 18 Away Rutgers

Comprehension says playing these games in a different order and time of year is completely different than just saying Nebraska played the same teams because when you play a team at a different time during the season makes a difference..

Ya Big difference instead of playing Purdue at home you go to Ohio St and you don’t even get Pundue at home it’s away the 3rd to last game...

Not to mention Nebraska had home games with Western Michigan and South Dakota St and Cincinnati that I already mentioned..

jlb321 isn’t even a Husker fan and just loves stirring $&it...

 

[timnsun]

Wisconsin finished 3-3 in the conference - third in the division

Neb under Frost has never beaten a team that finished in the top 3 of the West div
Neb in 2020 did not beat a team that finished .500 or better in the conference
Neb in 2019 did not beat a team that finished .500 or better in the conference
Neb is 2-6 at home against conf opponents the last 2 years
Neb and Wisc played 4 common opponents in 2020 -- Wisc had a 2-2 record Neb had a 0-4 record

absolutely no logical reason to expect Neb to have beaten Wisc

Upsets happen all the time. To deny that is illogical.

Absolutely stupid to expect Nebraska under Frost will never upset a top 3 team in the conference. Just because he hasn’t yet doesn’t automatically mean he never will.

I really thought you understood how logic works. Sorry this concept is so hard for you.

 

[Headcard]

Wisconsin finished 3-3 in the conference - third in the division

Neb under Frost has never beaten a team that finished in the top 3 of the West div
Neb under Frost is 1-14 against BIG teams with a .500 or better record

Neb in 2020 did not beat a team that finished .500 or better in the conference
Neb in 2019 did not beat a team that finished .500 or better in the conference
Neb is 2-6 at home against conf opponents the last 2 years
Neb and Wisc played 4 common opponents in 2020 -- Wisc had a 2-2 record Neb had a 0-4 record

absolutely no logical reason to expect Neb to have beaten Wisc

Cool story. So now can you answer his question?

 

[Redscarlet]

Cool story. So now can you answer his question?

He doesn’t have any balls he’ll avoid like the plaque...Every post needs to have him be asked this..

 

[Headcard]

 

[Redscarlet]

RollingLaugh

 

[HuskerO58]

Tuco, good to see you posting more once again... this board is better with you posting.

You’re right about the rope given to Frost being longer than an outsider. I’m one of those that is all in on Frost, and hoping the light bulb turns on for him and the team. But if his name was any name other than a former husker, I have no doubt I would be calling for his head.

I am who I am, for better or for worse.

For tim you're consistent so I don't think Tuco's post is directed towards someone like you.

You (like me) defended Riley so if we did that then we're going to defend almost anybody. Haha.

 

[bshirt73]

Haha.....probably the funniest damn movie I've ever seen.

 

[jlb321_rivals110621]

Upsets happen all the time. To deny that is illogical.

Absolutely stupid to expect Nebraska under Frost will never upset a top 3 team in the conference. Just because he hasn’t yet doesn’t automatically mean he never will.

I really thought you understood how logic works. Sorry this concept is so hard for you.

if we are going to go with the logic that upsets happen all the time

then logically Neb gets upset by SDSU or CMU

I said logically expect .... based on the records I posted there is no reason to expect Neb to have beaten Wisc

 

[Redscarlet]

if we are going to go with the logic that upsets happen all the time

then logically Neb gets upset by SDSU or CMU

I said logically expect .... based on the records I posted there is no reason to expect Neb to have beaten Wisc

Who is the team that is the only thing we care about you answering nothing you post from now on matters unless you answer it...
Go ahead we’re waiting...

 

[jlb321_rivals110621]

Who is the team that is the only thing we care about you answering nothing you post from now on matters unless you answer it...
Go ahead we’re waiting...

I haven't seen any logical reason to expect Neb beats Wisc in the original schedule .. that was the deal you proposed

when a team is 1-14 against similar teams under Frost and the records against common opponents is so lopsided in favor of Wisc there is no reason to expect Neb to beat Wisc

 

[timnsun]

if we are going to go with the logic that upsets happen all the time

then logically Neb gets upset by SDSU or CMU

I said logically expect .... based on the records I posted there is no reason to expect Neb to have beaten Wisc

Your initial question below...

deflect .. deflect .. deflect

still interested in a logical explanation of how this team would have gotten to 6 wins

and offering up that had Neb played Team A on date X rather than date Z they would have won is just sad

Not asking for a logical expectation. Just a logical explanation. Logically speaking, Nebraska could win the games they won this year and upset Wisconsin at home.

I did what you asked. Now kindly answer my question.

 

[Redscarlet]

I haven't seen any logical reason to expect Neb beats Wisc in the original schedule .. that was the deal you proposed

when a team is 1-14 against similar teams under Frost and the records against common opponents is so lopsided in favor of Wisc there is no reason to expect Neb to beat Wisc

Don’t care what the hell you think...We‘re all waiting which team you hang you hat on games does.. Don’t care about your opinions..

 

[timnsun]

For tim you're consistent so I don't think Tuco's post is directed towards someone like you.

You (like me) defended Riley so if we did that then we're going to defend almost anybody. Haha.

Don’t know if you remember, but I was on the Riley train right there with you most of the way... midway through season 3 I finally started changing my tune. You may have stayed on a little longer, but we both were on board.

 

[beaglehusker]

I haven't seen any logical reason to expect Neb beats Wisc in the original schedule .. that was the deal you proposed

when a team is 1-14 against similar teams under Frost and the records against common opponents is so lopsided in favor of Wisc there is no reason to expect Neb to beat Wisc

Name your team or STFU.

 

[jlb321_rivals110621]

Your initial question below...

Not asking for a logical expectation. Just a logical explanation. Logically speaking, Nebraska could win the games they won this year and upset Wisconsin at home.

I did what you asked. Now kindly answer my question.

I find your reasoning unsatisfactory

as I said .. I don't engage in quid pro quo

ta-ta, love

 

[timnsun]

I find your reasoning unsatisfactory

as I said .. I don't engage in quid pro quo

ta-ta, love

Lol, no one on here expected you would give it up. It’s not logical. The only thing you do on this board is troll and crap on the coaches.

so yeah, logically speaking, I knew you couldn’t come clean.

Satisfied with my use of logic now?

 

[beaglehusker]

I find your reasoning unsatisfactory

as I said .. I don't engage in quid pro quo

ta-ta, love

Name your team or STFU

 

[Redscarlet]

I find your reasoning unsatisfactory

as I said .. I don't engage in quid pro quo

ta-ta, love

Name your team or STFU and leave.

 

[blackbones]

If we hired an outside name and not SF would we still excuse what's been on the field?.. I think not