Generally, I don't see much benefit for a coach to complain to the ref about an individual call or calls in general. In fact, if I were a ref (I would never do that), it might tick me off enough to subconsciously bias me against a team that complains too much. So educate me about the effectiveness of working refs. In particular, who are the coaches who effectively and ineffectively lobby coaches? I assume that opinions here will particularly vary depending on voices from coaches, refs, and fans.
DISCLAIMER: I often don't know what I am talking about. I feel right at home on this forum.
Usually no, unless you're a successful older coach who is also a colossal prick or a massive b**** (in the case of the ladies i.e. Mulkey).
The refs seem to have that "oh you....stop" playful thought process behind listening to these "almighty" venerable veteran coaches bark at them. Either that or they're genuinely scared, if they're younger, because they know what kind of pull these older coaches can have with the jobs these refs get (and don't get).
Otherwise, no.........the vast majority of the time, it's in one ear and out the other, much like when trying to teach students or coach players who act like they have a "listening" disability.
And then you wonder why so many people get frustrated...........
And yes, there's very much the other side of the argument with immature coaches who make it their "character" to go after officials for every perceived slight.
..........and then you wonder why so many people get frustrated.
