Does Cal win another title?

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Welcome back, Zay. It's just so shocking to me that he picks this exact time to start posting again - to lead his legion of idiots who legitimately argue that a guy who has the second most championships, most wins, most final fours, and by far the most E8s (6/8) of any coach in the country while at UK is underachieving.
I'm not an idiot. I simply believe Cals method of team building is fatally flawed.
 

ZaytovenCat

All-American
Apr 25, 2013
23,889
8,435
97
Welcome back, Zay. It's just so shocking to me that he picks this exact time to start posting again - to lead his legion of idiots who legitimately argue that a guy who has the second most championships, most wins, most final fours, and by far the most E8s (6/8) of any coach in the country while at UK is underachieving.
Since you obviously can't read or check my posting history I'll just tell you that I never left.

Btw he's also had by far the best talent in that stretch. It's an absolute joke that we don't have ATLEAST 2 titles under Cal already.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Um, you think some of those guys are drafted on potential and get much better after they leave here. we get them when they are 18 years old, what kind of season do we have if we have a Jr Booker this year?
That isn't relevant and you know it. We will never have a top talent as a jr or sr. If they are still here they will be recruited over and will primarily ride the pine, or transfer....please see Hump.
 

Jkwo_rivals113955

All-American
Apr 6, 2007
28,225
7,410
0
I'm not an idiot. I simply believe Cals method of team building is fatally flawed.
Idiot? Maybe, maybe not - different people have different gifts, but your inexperience argument is terrible. Like, I do stats for a living and I would automatically cross your name off my list if your resume showed up in the inbox entirely based on your approach to the data. Confirmation bias, not considering the sample size, not isolating variables. It's really, really poor.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
I agree and that's the hard part. I'm sure that with a combination of our freshman this year and incoming freshman, there would be some that we could live without.

That's why Cal is the highest paid coach in college athletics.


That's the only part.

He recruits kids that are the best or think they are the best and most leave as they should.

If the ones with no business leaving would stay, the ones Cal told you likely wont be first round stayed we would be fine.

What if Orton was healthy and stayed with 2011?
Liggins could have helped 2012 even more.
Teague and Lamb in 2013 make that club 100 times better.
Archie is the only questionable one - twins and young coming in... who knows.
They stayed for 2015 and we lost the last 3 minutes of one game the entire season.
Booker and Dakari, on paper should have stayed along with the twins for 2016.
Then we have Mathews and Lee puss out.


But until someone shows the formula for which top 25 kid you turn down for a top 150 then it is a nonstarter.

And yes, most top 100 kids want a bunch of PT, so dont even consider that a top 50-75 kid is willing to come and wait his turn or roll the dice that he will ever get a turn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ineverplayedthegame

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Idiot? Maybe, maybe not - different people have different gifts, but your inexperience argument is terrible. Like, I do stats for a living and I would automatically cross your name off my list if your resume showed up in the inbox entirely based on your approach to the data. Confirmation bias, not considering the sample size, not isolating variables. It's really, really poor.
Quit being an arrogant ***. I run businesses. I have no need for a job from you. Now, try a direct response instead of your straw man argument.
 

51stFan

Junior
Dec 30, 2005
405
341
0
This is probably the hardest title to win in sports. It takes a lot of luck and Cal has not really had a whole lot. Saw a stat on here earlier and at UK Cal had only played two games against a double digit seed after the first round and one of those was this year against a mis-seeded Wichita State.

In comparison when UofL won in 2013 they played a 12 seed to go to elite 8. Played a 9 seed in final four and a 4 seed to win it. Kentucky played an 8,4,3,4,2 in 2012. 2011 final four UK played a 5,1,2,3. 2010 team did get a break and play a 12 seed to get to elite 8. For reference Duke played a 7 seed to make the title game in 2015. It's hard to win when your bracket never seems to fall apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

KYFOSSIL

Heisman
Jan 13, 2005
7,733
10,301
62
Yeah. Kinda like Bill Self does at Kansas, right? Win a bunch of games during the year and lose in the tournament. What's that get ya? Is the ultimate goal not a national title?
So like has been said time and again you must be one miserable jackass because championships are ver rare.
 

BigBlueCatNation

All-Conference
Jan 31, 2006
77,489
4,424
113
That's the only part.

He recruits kids that are the best or think they are the best and most leave as they should.

If the ones with no business leaving would stay, the ones Cal told you likely wont be first round stayed we would be fine.

What if Orton was healthy and stayed with 2011?
Liggins could have helped 2012 even more.
Teague and Lamb in 2013 make that club 100 times better.
Archie is the only questionable one - twins and young coming in... who knows.
They stayed for 2015 and we lost the last 3 minutes of one game the entire season.
Booker and Dakari, on paper should have stayed along with the twins for 2016.
Then we have Mathews and Lee puss out.


But until someone shows the formula for which top 25 kid you turn down for a top 150 then it is a nonstarter.

And yes, most top 100 kids want a bunch of PT, so dont even consider that a top 50-75 kid is willing to come and wait his turn or roll the dice that he will ever get a turn.

I don't necessarily disagree with you and good point on all the players that should've stayed. This part is on Cal, as much as I hate to admit it. He needs to let these guys know that there's no way they need to go yet and do everything he can to force them to stay, not only for their benefit but his and ours as well.

It's definitely a slippery slope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavyKat

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
I'm getting in on this late Brian, sorry, but I have to comment. I do not believe Cal will win another title and I'm not whining. Cals theory doesn't work. Relying on inexperience, man did it show today, will cost us at the end of every season. I've held this position for a while and I've stated it numerous times.

Next year we will have no upperclassmen. None. We will have a fantastic group of freshmen who will wilt at the end of the season, yet again. Hump will be a fool not to transfer and I'm sure he will.

So long as you like the "almost" years, Cals experiment is great. I prefer a little more considering the incredible talent that has passed through.

Cal had a really bad day today. For 8M I expect a bit more than that too.



Again, tell us which Top 25 recruit you say no to for the Top 150 kids you want to come and stay?


Wasn't Cal's best day, I agree. I will say that with the awful refereeing and his 2 guards on the bench his hands were tied a bit, but the end of the game wasn't the best coaching job.
 
Sep 13, 2003
23,905
33,655
0
How many of our 2017 recruits are rated as top 10 players? Hami Diallo may be the only one, if we don't sign anyone else.

Cal is the BEST recruiter/coach in college basketball. We have a shot at the NCAA Title EVERY YEAR with him !! It's beyond ridiculous for anyone to even attempt to prove otherwise.
 

Calsthebomb

All-American
Mar 7, 2016
7,406
6,262
0
I'm getting in on this late Brian, sorry, but I have to comment. I do not believe Cal will win another title and I'm not whining. Cals theory doesn't work. Relying on inexperience, man did it show today, will cost us at the end of every season. I've held this position for a while and I've stated it numerous times.

Next year we will have no upperclassmen. None. We will have a fantastic group of freshmen who will wilt at the end of the season, yet again. Hump will be a fool not to transfer and I'm sure he will.

So long as you like the "almost" years, Cals experiment is great. I prefer a little more considering the incredible talent that has passed through.

Cal had a really bad day today. For 8M I expect a bit more than that too.
67 teams will have had an "almost" year. You don't understand how hard it is to win a championship. Heck we went 14 years without a final four and now your complaining? SMH.
 

Jkwo_rivals113955

All-American
Apr 6, 2007
28,225
7,410
0
Quit being an arrogant ***. I run businesses. I have no need for a job from you. Now, try a direct response instead of your straw man argument.
I already gave a bunch of reasons why knocking Cal's approach in general is dumb just a page back. My response to you laid out exactly why your OP made absolutely no sense. And if you'd like an expansion on that which directly pertains to your point, go look at the stats of the underclassmen vs the upperclassmen during the last game of every season since Cal's been here.

And please, tell me the names of your businesses so I can be sure never to contract with you. There's nothing worse than working with people who are unreliable and who make emotional decisions when encountering adversity.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
I don't necessarily disagree with you and good point on all the players that should've stayed. This part is on Cal, as much as I hate to admit it. He needs to let these guys know that there's no way they need to go yet and do everything he can to force them to stay, not only for their benefit but his and ours as well.


If he forces them then he is lying to them when he recruits them. Simple as that.

Cal tells them what he hears and what he thinks and lets them make their own decisions.

It may suck for us at times but it is the honorable thing to do if you are going sell the message he does to recruits and their families..
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigBlueCatNation

JC CATS

Heisman
Jun 18, 2009
23,517
12,221
0
That isn't relevant and you know it. We will never have a top talent as a jr or sr. If they are still here they will be recruited over and will primarily ride the pine, or transfer....please see Hump.
I did, he played well today. I expect he will play even better next season
 

Anon1712931820

All-Conference
Apr 11, 2008
9,060
2,141
55
Um, you think some of those guys are drafted on potential and get much better after they leave here. we get them when they are 18 years old, what kind of season do we have if we have a Jr Booker this year?
Exactly! How is it that guys from UNC and Duke have the same "potential", but yet come back year after year? I love Cal and wouldn't trade him for anyone, but the idiots saying other coaches are big bad meanies because they don't shove kids out the door and allow them to come back are crazy. Those kids have the same potential, but come back to school and win titles. I wish some of our guys would do the same.
 

BigBlueCatNation

All-Conference
Jan 31, 2006
77,489
4,424
113
If he forces them then he is lying to them when he recruits them. Simple as that.

Cal tells them what he hears and what he thinks and lets them make their own decisions.

It may suck for us at times but it is the honorable thing to do if you are going sell the message he does to recruits and their families..

I get it, but something has to give.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

Ineverplayedthegame

All-Conference
Aug 12, 2005
5,139
4,960
0
I don't think Cal pushes people out. But. When you sell kids on getting them to the NBA as quickly as possible, they will leave as soon as possible. So. He will never have a junior Justin Jackson, or a senior Kennedy Meeks, or anyone like that. The best kids want to leave early. Until he gets the next Kobe, Lebron, or AD, odds are similar results.
I hope fans frustration is not because of Cal's results because how can you seriously argue with them. My frustration is seeing kids who are just good college players leaving early and even more living with the reality of never seeing anything close to our top players best in a UK uniform.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Again, tell us which Top 25 recruit you say no to for the Top 150 kids you want to come and stay?


Wasn't Cal's best day, I agree. I will say that with the awful refereeing and his 2 guards on the bench his hands were tied a bit, but the end of the game wasn't the best coaching job.
If he didn't load up on 5*s to the point of other guys not getting off the bench, I'd say he could get plenty.

I fully disagree with his recruiting style and you know I haven't changed my position. If you're telling me he can't build a solid team that matures through the system and every year add 2-3 top players for specific needs, well, I don't believe that.

Next year will be brutal.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Exactly! How is it that guys from UNC and Duke have the same "potential", but yet come back year after year? I love Cal and wouldn't trade him for anyone, but the idiots saying other coaches are big bad meanies because they don't shove kids out the door and allow them to come back are crazy. Those kids have the same potential, but come back to school and win titles. I wish some of our guys would do the same.


Which player did Cal shove out and not let come back?

I know of only 2.
 

wildcat1515

All-Conference
Feb 7, 2006
5,412
2,895
113
Because his teams have been so consistently good, it's becoming clear just how hard it is to win a title. Maybe I thought it would be easier with the talent he brings in. But man Cal's tenure so far has been full of unbelievable wins and some absolutely heartbreaking losss.

Does he win another one?

If they give us easy brackets like Duke..
 

buck8113

All-Conference
Feb 20, 2010
3,492
1,126
0
It is the hardest title to get, But we are doing it the hardest way. we get freshman every year and they do great and I have no problem because they do win. BUT my god people look at it for what it is worth the refs in the sec seem to be on vegas pay roll or are just bad. every year I watch the selection show and when I hear them say boy that is the worst and brutal bracket out there you know KY is in it. Then when KY bust there young *** to make it thru they throw the worst refs in the game at us that hate Cal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
67 teams will have had an "almost" year. You don't understand how hard it is to win a championship. Heck we went 14 years without a final four and now your complaining? SMH.
Yes and no. How about we wait and see who is right. I still say Cal won't see another title.
 

o_jollyroger

Junior
May 17, 2010
383
270
0
Cal will have another title in 2-3 years. Take it to the bank. Anyone who consistently gets this far into the tournament is eventually going to break through and win 6 straight.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
If he didn't load up on 5*s to the point of other guys not getting off the bench, I'd say he could get plenty.

I fully disagree with his recruiting style and you know I haven't changed my position. If you're telling me he can't build a solid team that matures through the system and every year add 2-3 top players for specific needs, well, I don't believe that.

Next year will be brutal.


Still doesn't answer the question, how many Top 20-30 kids do you turn away for the lesser talented Top 100-150 kids?

And yes, next year may be awful.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
I already gave a bunch of reasons why knocking Cal's approach in general is dumb just a page back. My response to you laid out exactly why your OP made absolutely no sense. And if you'd like an expansion on that which directly pertains to your point, go look at the stats of the underclassmen vs the upperclassmen during the last game of every season since Cal's been here.

And please, tell me the names of your businesses so I can be sure never to contract with you. There's nothing worse than working with people who are unreliable and who make emotional decisions when encountering adversity.
What an arrogant jackass you are being. It's funny. I haven't posted anything out if emotion your highness. I've said the same thing for years. As for your challenge, we haven't recruited in a way to test my theory so your statement is moot.
 

WildmanWilson_rivals

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2010
2,300
1,544
0
Cal will have another title in 2-3 years. Take it to the bank. Anyone who consistently gets this far into the tournament is eventually going to break through and win 6 straight.
Is "take it to bank" as good as "mark it down" people like to say on here? Seems it's worth spit.
 

Jkwo_rivals113955

All-American
Apr 6, 2007
28,225
7,410
0
Since you obviously can't read or check my posting history I'll just tell you that I never left.

Btw he's also had by far the best talent in that stretch. It's an absolute joke that we don't have ATLEAST 2 titles under Cal already.
Oh, I know that you're hanging out in the game threads bitching about Cal's decisions.

I'm talking about your big coming out party, honey. Happens every March. You just strut your stuff for the whole world.


And I've smacked this point down so many times and I don't know if I have the energy to type it agai... wait yes I do.

CAL AND K HAVE THE SAME AVERAGE NUMBER OF 5 STARS PER ROSTER DURING CAL'S TENURE AT UK AND K IS THE REPUTED GREATEST COACH OF ALL TIME YET DOES NOT HAVE CLEARLY SUPERIOR RESULTS TO CAL
 

Jkwo_rivals113955

All-American
Apr 6, 2007
28,225
7,410
0
Oh, I know that you're hanging out in the game threads bitching about Cal's decisions.

I'm talking about your big coming out party, honey. Happens every March. You just strut your stuff for the whole world.


And I've smacked this point down so many times and I don't know if I have the energy to type it agai... wait yes I do.

CAL AND K HAVE THE SAME AVERAGE NUMBER OF 5 STARS PER ROSTER DURING CAL'S TENURE AT UK AND K IS THE REPUTED GREATEST COACH OF ALL TIME YET DOES NOT HAVE CLEARLY SUPERIOR RESULTS TO CAL
Can you ignore it this time, Zay?
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Still doesn't answer the question, how many Top 20-30 kids do you turn away for the lesser talented Top 100-150 kids?

And yes, next year may be awful.
I doubt if Cal can unring the bell at this point. Will those 70-150 kids believe they won't be recruited over? I doubt it. I already said I think it would be best if we took 2-3 oads per year, the rest is a foundation for the future.

It doesn't matter though. Too much of our fan base is infatuated with oads so it will never stop while Cal is here. That is why I have repeatedly said Cal won't win another title.

I love Cal but he fell in love with being able to recruit and endless string of top 20 kids. Now he can't stop.