Dims blink on impeachment

[WVUCOOPER]

The House will vote this week on a resolution to formalize the next steps of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

The resolution — which “establishes the procedure for hearings,” according to a statement by Speaker Nancy Pelosi — will mark the first floor vote on impeachment since Democrats formally launched their inquiry a month ago.

"We are taking this step to eliminate any doubt as to whether the Trump Administration may withhold documents, prevent witness testimony, disregard duly authorized subpoenas, or continue obstructing the House of Representatives," Pelosi said in a letter to Democrats obtained by POLITICO.

:joy::joy::joy:

 

[TarHeelEer]

 

[atlkvb]

:joy::joy::joy:

You cannot legally, Constitutionally, or even (ahem) Conservatively, refute any of the facts outlined here.

So to that I say to YOU

:joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:

 

[Shirley Knott]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Bet still secure ATL.

Just think a moment. If they can setup a sitting president with a kangaroo court, how easy will/would it be to deny justice for your average citizen? No defense lawyers, no questions of the prosecution.......death of freedom !!!

 

[atlkvb]

They will do whatever Nancy tells them to do. They are Pelosi's lackwys

Did you happen to notice Dave how no one on the Left can explain how a vote "not necessary" last week is suddenly "necessary"?

Just how do they explain that? Or even better, how do we even get to a legitimate vote in committee to authorize an impeachment hearing then vote in the full House if a formal "investigation" hasn't even been voted on?

So we're going to send an impeachment "inquiry" to the full House membership to vote on impeachment?

OK.

 

[atlkvb]

Just think a moment. If they can setup a sitting president with a kangaroo court, how easy will/would it be to deny justice for your average citizen? No defense lawyers, no questions of the prosecution.......death of freedom !!!

Quite a sacary thought huh? Look what they did to Flynn on essentially a made up prosecution?

 

[dave]

Did you happen to notice Dave how no one on the Left can explain how a vote "not necessary" last week is suddenly "necessary"?

Just how do they explain that? Or even better, how do we even get to a legitimate vote in committee to authorize an impeachment hearing then vote in the full House if a formal "investigation" hasn't even been voted on?

So we're going to send an impeachment "inquiry" to the full House membership to vote on impeachment?

OK.

They dont have to explain. To the left the narrative is written and sent out at 4am to the media and the media passes it along to the sheep. They do as they are told

 

[atlkvb]

They dont have to explain. To the left the narrative is written and sent out at 4am to the media and the media passes it along to the sheep. They do as they are told

CNN's overnight crew. Brilliant analysis no one watches. [eyeroll]

 

[Keyser76]

lmfao, damn ya'll some gullible nitwits. Just read the transcript like Donnie is tweeting this morning! totally exonerates him! Witch Hunt Over! they caught the witch I guess, lol.

 

[dave]

lmfao, damn ya'll some gullible nitwits. Just read the transcript like Donnie is tweeting this morning! totally exonerates him! Witch Hunt Over! they caught the witch I guess, lol.

The transcript does totally exonerate. The problem is the libs keep trotting everyone into congress for their opinion on iy.

 

[30CAT]

trump cock suckers are so mad they act delusional.

Since November 8th, 2016, there has been non-stop wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left and you accuse us of being mad and delusional? [jumpingsmile]

 

[atlkvb]

lmfao, damn ya'll some gullible nitwits. Just read the transcript like Donnie is tweeting this morning! totally exonerates him! Witch Hunt Over! they caught the witch I guess, lol.

Hey Keyser. Who has more authority on what Trump said...his actual words on the actual transcript or what someone thought or heard he said from someone else?

 

[dave]

Since November 8th, 2016, there has been non-stop wailing and gnashing of teeth by the left and you accuse us of being mad and delusional? [jumpingsmile]

Leave him alone. He has to bring up copulation once a day on principle.

 

[atlkvb]

You really want to go there?

LMAO!

Tom Brokaw knows as much about a legitimate impeachment inquiry as anyone in the media today. He's reported on BOTH Nixon and Clinton's impeachment process. He says this latest version misses the mark.

In short, Dems have no case on Trump. Only they and YOU don't know it yet.


link:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/tom-brokaw-democrats-dont-have-the-goods-
on-trump-as-they-did-with-nixon

Excerpt:
Brokaw, who covered the Watergate scandal as a White House correspondent in 1973, said Tuesday that Democrats don't have "the goods” on Trump "with the same kind of clarity" the party did when Richard Nixon was president.

“The big difference is … they still don’t have what you call 'the goods' on this president in terms of breaking the law and being an impeachable target for them,"

Translation: Today's Democrats are holding an impeachment "inquiry" without any evidence of an actual impeachable "crime". They won't find one either.

No impeachment vote.