You don't want to fund FEMA eitherDid those bills ONLY fund the TSA?
You don't want to fund FEMA either
Sigh
Bro, you posted without actually fact checking. You were simply wrong, just own it and be a man.You don't want to fund FEMA either
You're lying
- The SAVE act is an 80-20 issue but I don't think Trump should be using it as leverage over he shutdown.
- You're totally mischaracterizing the offer made by democrats. If that's all they wanted they would have passed the original house bill.
- The SAVE act is an 80-20 issue but I don't think Trump should be using it as leverage over he shutdown.
- You're totally mischaracterizing the offer made by democrats. If that's all they wanted they would have passed the original house bill.

- The SAVE act is an 80-20 issue but I don't think Trump should be using it as leverage over he shutdown.
- You're totally mischaracterizing the offer made by democrats. If that's all they wanted they would have passed the original house bill.
Wrong. Voter Id is a 80-20 issue. Only 30% of Americans support the save act. Stop spreading misinformation.
I mean, regardless- ANYONE illegal doesn't fly domestic or international. Trust me, I've looked into it and am kinda screwed for childcare for Coachella cuz of itJemele Hill? Holy shytt![]()
Who GAF, she was posting someone else's tweet. Is that really worth 7 laughies?Jemele Hill? Holy shytt![]()
“Laughies”Who GAF, she was posting someone else's tweet. Is that really worth 7 laughies?
Serious question, why are you so immature? Surely you can see you're the only poster who acts like a school-age mean girl, no?“Laughies”![]()
Because no tangible voter fraud exists. Every single time there’s some big investigation nothing is found. Most voter fraud is committed by republicans. It’s not a problem. It’s an imaginary boogey man invented by the GOP to try to disenfranchise voters, as they understand that their policies are not popular so the only way to win elections is to either lie, commit fraud, or reduce the amount of people who voteIf voter ID is a 80-20 issue, why do democrats oppose it? It’s long been vehemently opposed independent of the save act. Honest question.
Because no tangible voter fraud exists. Every single time there’s some big investigation nothing is found. Most voter fraud is committed by republicans. It’s not a problem. It’s an imaginary boogey man invented by the GOP to try to disenfranchise voters, as they understand that their policies are not popular so the only way to win elections is to either lie, commit fraud, or reduce the amount of people who vote
Because making photo ID required and other so-called “anti-voter fraud” measures does nothing for voter fraud. It simply makes it harder to vote and restricts voting access.If not doesn’t exist, yet is wildly popular, why oppose it? Popular with voters and no impact to voters. I really don’t get it.
Well if anyone knows what a school-age girl acts like, it would be you, Dpic. It’s the disgusting Dem in you.Serious question, why are you so immature? Surely you can see you're the only poster who acts like a school-age mean girl, no?
Omigod Becky,no, but like, I totally wouldn't be embarrassed if I did.Well if anyone knows what a school-age girl acts like, it would be you, Dpic. It’s the disgusting Dem in you.
My turn to ask a question…
Did you march any political protests this past weekend — {insert “Laughies
Jeez dude. I’m embarrassed for youOmigod Becky,no, but like, I totally wouldn't be embarrassed if I did.
So like, how was Vegas this past weekend? Are you like, totally broke now? Like did you literally max out daddy's plastic?
In this world of totally factual news....I'm always surprised how people jump on to whatever facts are laid out on the internet - as long as they support their individual biases...
- The SAVE act is an 80-20 issue but I don't think Trump should be using it as leverage over he shutdown.
- You're totally mischaracterizing the offer made by democrats. If that's all they wanted they would have passed the original house bill.
I'm not worried about getting shot by an ICE agent at the airport. I realize that some people will consider me quite naive.In this world of totally factual news....I'm always surprised how people jump on to whatever facts are laid out on the internet - as long as they support their individual biases...
well, since this is the accepted standard..I've got one for you...I read that the person arrested not only couldn't prove her citizenship (apparently because she isn't one - according to reports), she has a deportation order from 2019 and is in the country illegally in spite of that order.
Let's look at this positively, after the hand wringing on the Sunday news shows, we've gone a full day without ICE agents killing any American citizens as predicted but our house minority leader. Of course that doesn't mean a dozen or so won't be shot and killed today.
you don't mean democrats (or republicans) would stretch reality in their statements?I'm not worried about getting shot by an ICE agent at the airport. I realize that some people will consider me quite naive.
FWIW Jeffries also said that republicans cut Medicaid but reality is they just required able bodied working age people without dependents to work 20 hrs per week. He said tens of millions would lose insurance coverage if enhanced covid subsidies weren't extended. The reality is that 1.4 million fewer people are getting insurance through the exchange and many of them are getting coverage elsewhere.
Wrong. Voter Id is a 80-20 issue. Only 30% of Americans support the save act. Stop spreading misinformation.
Look above. It's more than just voter id...If not doesn’t exist, yet is wildly popular, why oppose it? Popular with voters and no impact to voters. I really don’t get it.
Our media is horrible. They're at the point where they identify the political bias of their readers/viewers and slant their reporting in that direction. It's nearly impossible to find a media source with non biased reporting.you don't mean democrats (or republicans) would stretch reality in their statements?
- The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act would require all American citizens registering to vote or updating their registration information to present documentary proof of citizenship in person. For the vast majority of Americans, this would be a passport or birth certificate.
- Government-issued driver’s licenses—including REAL IDs—as well as military or tribal IDs do not satisfy the bill’s requirements.
- The legislation would invert the responsibility to verify a person’s eligibility and citizenship status from election officials and the government onto every single American citizen, making citizens convince the government that they’re eligible to exercise their right to vote.
- The SAVE Act would change the way all citizens register to vote upon enactment. It would upend online voter registration, make it impossible to mail in a registration application, and eliminate voter registration drives.
- Approximately 146 million American citizens do not possess a valid passport—for context, 153 million Americans voted in the 2024 presidential general election.
-84 percent of women who marry change their surname, meaning as many as 69 million American women do not have a birth certificate with their legal name on it and thereby could not use their birth certificate to prove citizenship. The SAVE Act makes no mention of being able to show a marriage certificate or change-of-name documentation
Look above. It's more than just voter id...
It's proof of U.S. citizenship.Look above. It's more than just voter id...
- The passport argument is a red herring. It's just one way to prove citizenship.
- Everybody has a birth certificate and it's relatively easy to get a replacement if you lost it (online at vital records office).
- The passport argument is a red herring. It's just one way to prove citizenship.
- Everybody has a birth certificate and it's relatively easy to get a replacement if you lost it (online at vital records office).
I thought they already had a vote solely on voter ID and the Dems blocked it...Heard a senator on squawk box this morning say that they are going to do a straight up or down vote only on voter ID this week. I imagine that will be well supported by the Dems if it’s the other things in the Save act they don’t like?
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Checking in with top 10 Clemson in-state commit Jaden Wuerth
Tiger Illustrated Football
MONDAY CLEMSON FOOTBALL NUGGETS: Intel on travel logistics with Cal trip, Corian Gipson, UNC's long bus ride, transfer DBs
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
MONDAY INSIDER
Tiger Illustrated Football
A new way of looking at this Clemson football team
Tiger Illustrated Football
Clemson Football: The Day After