Cowbells at cws?

[gymdawg.sixpack]

I didn't go last yr. But there was a heated debate between fans and security back in 2013. Ncaa website said it was cool. Td Ameritrade security didnt like it and picked on mostly kids. Any word for 2019?

 

[DAWGS1.sixpack]

Have no idea but 17 it!
Bring em and ring em !!!!!

 

[karlchilders.sixpack]

Put it in the car

we will tell you before Sunday's game.

If you don't have it, you can't use it.

 

[dickiedawg]

View attachment 13198
Thats gonna be a no on cowbells. Also, Vandy's Number One Fan is in trouble.

 

[BELdog]

Na. They won’t touch the Vandy whistlers.

 

[gymdawg.sixpack]

Yea that guy better hope hes not hangin out where i do. Yall be talkin about a misunderstanding next week

 

[dickiedawg]

It seems like that rule is almost specifically worded to exclude the whistlers, otherwise it would say "no noisemakers" like pretty much every other stadium policy.

 

[WilCoDawg]

I wonder how many mortgages on his trailer that guy will have to go to Omaha. (No sarcastricks)

 

[Hugh's Burner Phone]

It seems like that rule is almost specifically worded to exclude the whistlers, otherwise it would say "no noisemakers" like pretty much every other stadium policy.

I wish you were right but have my doubts. I'm not aware of any stadium that bans naturally made noises such as screaming, yelling, or whistling. Looks like they're just talking about your good old referee whistle.

 

[kphall11]

just stick to bringing your cowbell to football games.

 

[RocketDawg]

No, I read it to say no WHISTLES. Using his mouth and fingers isn't using a whistle. He could be covered under some rule about being obnoxious I would think.

 

[dickiedawg]

And I read it to say "disruptive noise making of any kind." It definitely gives them an option, now whether they exercise that option is another question.
It also says at the bottom if your conduct is "disruptive" they have the right to remove you.

 

[hdogg]

I always thought of cowbells as a way to help our home field advantage to compete w UTenn in the 80s, or aTm or bama now, that had 30-40k more fans than we could hold in the stadium.
Doesn't compute for omaha , and we certainly don't want to be like the whistler.
Just my opinion , hailstate

 

[yjnkdawg]

And I read it to say "disruptive noise making of any kind." It definitely gives them an option, now whether they exercise that option is another question.
It also says at the bottom if your conduct is "disruptive" they have the right to remove you.

ESPN has confronted the whistlers on their ESPN broadcasts in the past, about ruining their broadcasts, but nothing ever came out of it. I don't think the policy would interpret non-artificial whistling as disruptive conduct. Although I would and many opposing team fans would. I think the only actual problem they have gotten into is any confrontational disruptive conduct with another fan, and sitting in seats that they didn't pay for. I think when they do that, they do it to get closer to the ESPN mikes, the opposing fans, or both.