Covid 6.0

Status
Not open for further replies.

tpmcg_rivals137159

All-Conference
Mar 25, 2002
10,437
1,024
0
The county I live in I think has 1 case that I know of, so absolutely no reason to shutdown the entire state.

Not to mention it is calving season, guys are applying anhydrous and planters will be rolling in 3 weeks if it ever warms up. Good luck shutting all that down.

essentials. period.
 
Jan 10, 2020
8,138
0
0
My fiance and I had it in January. Her antibody test came back yesterday. Positive, as well.

All 3 doctors in her oncology clinic (attached to a hospital) say, without question, everyone in that clinic has been exposed.

Also, they've been exposed recently. 2 weeks have now gone by since exposure to positive patient without reinfection.

This quarantine is led by those who are trained to mitigate risk at all cost (medical experts) and championed by those who either could care less/have no incentive to work (schools/academics) or have big legal liability should someone become infected (events/sports leagues).
 
Last edited:

Ewooc

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2010
6,114
3,053
0
My fiance and I had it in January. Her antibody test came back yesterday. Positive, as well.

All 3 doctors in her oncology clinic (attached to a hospital) say, without question, everyone in that clinic has been exposed.

This quarantine is led by those who are trained to mitigate risk at all cost (medical experts) and championed by those who either could care less/have no incentive to work (schools/academics) or have big legal liability should someone become infected (events/sports leagues).
Didn't they literally just start doing this yesterday? You were able to get tested already?
 

GBRforLife1

Redshirt
Feb 18, 2020
13,913
3
38
My fiance and I had it in January. Her antibody test came back yesterday. Positive, as well.

All 3 doctors in her oncology clinic (attached to a hospital) say, without question, everyone in that clinic has been exposed.

This quarantine is led by those who are trained to mitigate risk at all cost (medical experts) and championed by those who either could care less/have no incentive to work (schools/academics) or have big legal liability should someone become infected (events/sports leagues).

It has likely been going through the country for months. Perhaps it's taken a while to find those vulnerable enough to kill?

The media hysteria is driving a lot of people to the hospital and testing who would've otherwise stayed home.

The 16K pneumonia deaths we've had so far (and do every year) in the USA likely would've all been classified coronavirus deaths if we'd been testing since the beginning of the year.
 
Jan 10, 2020
8,138
0
0
Didn't they literally just start doing this yesterday? You were able to get tested already?
I didn't get tested, my fiance did. She's an oncology nurse working with very high risk patients.

I'm sure I wouldn't be able to get a test, but don't need to. We had the same sickness (fever, aches, sore throat, persistent cough) 2 weeks apart in Jan.
 

Solana Beach Husker

All-Conference
Aug 7, 2008
14,102
1,245
0
We're in uncharted water here. What we did basically was to horrendously devalue our currency by increasing the money supply. It may not matter because other countries will probably be forced to do the same. People with hard assets (mostly the wealthy long term will probably be fine). Farmers may do okay because this should make our commodities cheaper relative to other countries and this should make their land more valuable in a longer time frame. What happens economically long term from this will be a very interesting academic study.

Low interest rates and printing money. We're trying desperately to do things to get people to borrow and spend money. Unfortunately I sold my Moneatary and Fiscal Analysis text book. It would be interesting to crack that baby back open and read it again.

America has real wealth...agriculture, mineral wealth, technology, water, energy, and education, and the ability to move these things at will...we can also import these things at will because of our dominance of trade routes and our port access. Take Russia for example..they have some of these things but only have one warm water port that is blocked by Turkey...so every single decision Russia makes has to take into account relations with turkey because they can cut off trade...hence the ridiculous over land route to china that they are building. Europe relies on America and Russia for energy so they have to pander to one or both at the same time...and their economy suffers for it. China is surrounded by adversaries, although they have attempted to improve relations...they also can't feed themselves and can't produce goods for their own populace so they need Africa...so their trade routes move through oceans that we control because of naval supremacy.
 

RedMyMind

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2017
12,390
1,506
0
I didn't get tested, my fiance did. She's an oncology nurse working with very high risk patients.

I'm sure I wouldn't be able to get a test, but don't need to. We had the same sickness (fever, aches, sore throat, persistent cough) 2 weeks apart in Jan.
what state are you in?
 

RedMyMind

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2017
12,390
1,506
0
Experienced this Early March. In Kansas.

"I had digestive issues 2 weeks ago. Shitting and vomiting on day 1 and subsequent severe fatigue/delirium, muscle weakness, headaches and random sore throat for 2 weeks. Feel back to normal now. Wonder if I had it."
 
Last edited:

yort2000

Junior
Jan 23, 2007
2,267
298
0

Positive news for the day:

NY reported hospitalization for the day less than releases for the 2nd day in a row.

Hospitalized 1,427
Released 1,452
 

GBRforLife1

Redshirt
Feb 18, 2020
13,913
3
38
Positive news for the day:

NY reported hospitalization for the day less than releases for the 2nd day in a row.

Hospitalized 1,427
Released 1,452

Maybe we can get some of the medical guys to weigh in here, but that means there are empty beds right?
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
One thing I've learned about in my time with the Fed govt is that while incapable of doing even mundane things efficiently in normal times, its capable of moving mountains in extreme times.

Note I said capable. There are a myriad of laws and authority that govern our actions. Liberals and conservatives have long argued about which one should be had or not had. In the end, the USG has a primary mission to keep this sovereign entity going, pretty much no matter the cost.

I do believe Trump wants to save lives. I do believe he's being personally impacted on a wealth measure. I do believe he wants to be President again and needs his economy to give him the warm fuzzy about his chances. His whole being was born to be impatient.

There's zero doubt in my mind that he is pre-disposed to try anything anyone can reasonably put in front of his face as a solution. There's also zero doubt in my mind that he has a mechanism through the Task Force or some emergency power that he can use to shoe horn a vaccine, assuming it exists as a reasonable solution, through a short cut process. And if there's not, there's a lawyer that will find him a mechanism.

So I'm not exactly panicked that some GS13 at the FDA is going to slow roll this thing like the conservatives fret, or that Trump won't even try like the liberals fret.
Theres zero doubt some think the pres doesnt know anything, and is proved over and over again on this board.
Chloroquine. Great example. Closing our country to china, another great example that those who think he just is desperate, both times,he was ahead of the curve, and makes it as a president should act and do, not a desperate fool.
Besides, I asked you, you said, under his economy, are you a foreigner? This is our economy, and we all should care, unless you're a foreigner?
 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
Maybe we can get some of the medical guys to weigh in here, but that means there are empty beds right?


it likely means they are operating at ~ 380% capacity rather than 400%
a few less patients in the halls - and a provider trying to direct the care of 50 patients rather than 55 (normal is 15)

the idea of lessening the curve is to try to get to the point where discharges are greater than admits at 150% capacity rather than 400% capacity

also when they say hospital releases - a large portion of these are deaths
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
This is at least one reason why states are calling for more national response.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/florida-emergency-official-3m-selling-masks-overseas

And Florida reportedly is a darling of Trump and had received three shipments of supplies already.
You need to watch yesterdays white house pc.
They address this and other things in the supply chain. We have to honor current contracts, then it gets our attentions,where the governments aren't competing against themselves, whether state to state or fed vs state.
But everyone knew this was happe
 

Solana Beach Husker

All-Conference
Aug 7, 2008
14,102
1,245
0
Theres zero doubt some think the pres doesnt know anything, and is proved over and over again on this board.
Chloroquine. Great example. Closing our country to china, another great example that those who think he just is desperate, both times,he was ahead of the curve, and makes it as a president should act and do, not a desperate fool.
Besides, I asked you, you said, under his economy, are you a foreigner? This is our economy, and we all should care, unless you're a foreigner?

I had brought up the hydroxychloroquine days before the president. This was fairly common knowledge for anybody with a basic knowledge of RNA virus replication. Zinc disrupts RNA replication in the cytoplasm...zinc doesn't build up in cells...so you need an ionophore to force zinc into the cell...I first heard about it in late February...so about 3 weeks before the president reported...and the Koreans were actively using it before the president reported. Also, closing the border to china is an ignorant thing to do...there are 50000 either wealthy or high skilled chinese workers that may need to come and go between china and america...they will receive waivers to enter the country and the president can't enforce this...it would have made much more sense to quarantine any person from a nation with community spread...Iran, China, Italy...that would have taken much coordination and organization, and the U.S is lacking in that area obviously. Look, the President is and has always been a figurehead...FDR didn't run the War...his job was to put competent people in charge and stay out of the way, but be aware enough to put on a show when the nations needs it. The president can also be a hammer in tough times when there is infighting...IE Germany first policy in World War II...or stopping American companies from producing nazi equipment. This president is ignorant to science, he has made this clear time and time again..that isn't his thing...there are consequences for electing a president who has active disdain for science and the scientific method. How big are the consequences...I don't know...hopefully we will think next time and not elect somebody because they have a real nice smile, or would be fun to have a beer with, or will fight china...we as americans, demand very little from our president in terms of real knowledge or education.
 
Aug 27, 2006
27,799
5,563
0
I had brought up the hydroxychloroquine days before the president. This was fairly common knowledge for anybody with a basic knowledge of RNA virus replication. Zinc disrupts RNA replication in the cytoplasm...zinc doesn't build up in cells...so you need an ionophore to force zinc into the cell...I first heard about it in late February...so about 3 weeks before the president reported...and the Koreans were actively using it before the president reported. Also, closing the border to china is an ignorant thing to do...there are 50000 either wealthy or high skilled chinese workers that may need to come and go between china and america...they will receive waivers to enter the country and the president can't enforce this...it would have made much more sense to quarantine any person from a nation with community spread...Iran, China, Italy...that would have taken much coordination and organization, and the U.S is lacking in that area obviously. Look, the President is and has always been a figurehead...FDR didn't run the War...his job was to put competent people in charge and stay out of the way, but be aware enough to put on a show when the nations needs it. The president can also be a hammer in tough times when there is infighting...IE Germany first policy in World War II...or stopping American companies from producing nazi equipment. This president is ignorant to science, he has made this clear time and time again..that isn't his thing...there are consequences for electing a president who has active disdain for science and the scientific method. How big are the consequences...I don't know...hopefully we will think next time and not elect somebody because they have a real nice smile, or would be fun to have a beer with, or will fight china...we as americans, demand very little from our president in terms of real knowledge or education.

I'm starting to think you don't care for Trump.
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
I had brought up the hydroxychloroquine days before the president. This was fairly common knowledge for anybody with a basic knowledge of RNA virus replication. Zinc disrupts RNA replication in the cytoplasm...zinc doesn't build up in cells...so you need an ionophore to force zinc into the cell...I first heard about it in late February...so about 3 weeks before the president reported...and the Koreans were actively using it before the president reported. Also, closing the border to china is an ignorant thing to do...there are 50000 either wealthy or high skilled chinese workers that may need to come and go between china and america...they will receive waivers to enter the country and the president can't enforce this...it would have made much more sense to quarantine any person from a nation with community spread...Iran, China, Italy...that would have taken much coordination and organization, and the U.S is lacking in that area obviously. Look, the President is and has always been a figurehead...FDR didn't run the War...his job was to put competent people in charge and stay out of the way, but be aware enough to put on a show when the nations needs it. The president can also be a hammer in tough times when there is infighting...IE Germany first policy in World War II...or stopping American companies from producing nazi equipment. This president is ignorant to science, he has made this clear time and time again..that isn't his thing...there are consequences for electing a president who has active disdain for science and the scientific method. How big are the consequences...I don't know...hopefully we will think next time and not elect somebody because they have a real nice smile, or would be fun to have a beer with, or will fight china...we as americans, demand very little from our president in terms of real knowledge or education.
In Italy, those thousands of chinese were let right in, so, those thousands who went to new years were returning at over four thousand a month, we caught a portion of the first wave coming back, and both subsequent waves.
It doesn't matter who you are, it's where you're from,you get quaratined. So those of whom you
speak were quarantined. The president did indeed enforce this. I know on a personal level.

As far as any president being a figurehead just doesn't understand the constitution.
The evecutive branch is for expedition and granularity. Doesn't take much thought that if all these things had to be run through the house and then the senate, we'd still be welcoming in all flights, as every congressman would have their expert staff, same for the senate, everything had to be weighed amongst the staffs, each house and senate member then would weigh their position, then each go to their respective chamber for argument and presentation, then eventually a vote.
Figurehead my ***
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
The executive branch can expidite fast, rules are in place to make this quick response, meaning a action can be had by the president, but isn't permanent if the congress needs to vote, like war. A reactive action is not war, but a timely expidited response.
Another way, that julian rodriguez? The kid from cuba, rarely does congress act on one persons behalf, unless it was to prop up a commy government.
Not so with presidents, who often let people out of jails and prisons etc, or starts actions when confronted one on one, as in changing draconian actions and judgements against old drug laws, and ending long sentences.
This granularity is so needed, our founders knew this, and why its so.
 

Ewooc

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2010
6,114
3,053
0
I had brought up the hydroxychloroquine days before the president. This was fairly common knowledge for anybody with a basic knowledge of RNA virus replication. Zinc disrupts RNA replication in the cytoplasm...zinc doesn't build up in cells...so you need an ionophore to force zinc into the cell...I first heard about it in late February...so about 3 weeks before the president reported...and the Koreans were actively using it before the president reported. Also, closing the border to china is an ignorant thing to do...there are 50000 either wealthy or high skilled chinese workers that may need to come and go between china and america...they will receive waivers to enter the country and the president can't enforce this...it would have made much more sense to quarantine any person from a nation with community spread...Iran, China, Italy...that would have taken much coordination and organization, and the U.S is lacking in that area obviously. Look, the President is and has always been a figurehead...FDR didn't run the War...his job was to put competent people in charge and stay out of the way, but be aware enough to put on a show when the nations needs it. The president can also be a hammer in tough times when there is infighting...IE Germany first policy in World War II...or stopping American companies from producing nazi equipment. This president is ignorant to science, he has made this clear time and time again..that isn't his thing...there are consequences for electing a president who has active disdain for science and the scientific method. How big are the consequences...I don't know...hopefully we will think next time and not elect somebody because they have a real nice smile, or would be fun to have a beer with, or will fight china...we as Americans, demand very little from our president in terms of real knowledge or education.
I have no issues with people pointing out Trumps flaws or how he has handled this. What I do have issues with is hypocrites. No Im not calling you a hypocrite. Just those who incessantly bash Trump but fail to see the overwhelming faults of their own party. This applies to Dems and Rep. There isn't a person in the Dem or Rep party that wouldn't have made mistakes during this. I would bet money there isn't one of them who would have us in any better position. To think otherwise is idiotic. This is something that NOBODY in a leadership position has ever had to deal with. If the US was the ONLY country seeing these type of infections and deaths then yes there would be grounds for bashing Trump. Before someone comes screaming at me, "but we have the most cases" . You my friend are an idiot and Im not going to waste my time trying to explain math and per capita infection rate to you.
The left has such an overwhelming hatred for 1 man that their whole life focus is to find negatives however small or minimal or even if none at all. They completely ignore the overwhelming issues/incompetence with their own party leadership. I know this comes off as a Republican rant. I consider myself an independent. I voted Obama in 08 and Trump in 16. I try not to be blinded by the party lines BS. I try to look at the good and the bad that both sides have. Blind hatred tends to skew reality.
 
Last edited:

GBRforLife1

Redshirt
Feb 18, 2020
13,913
3
38
it likely means they are operating at ~ 380% capacity rather than 400%
a few less patients in the halls - and a provider trying to direct the care of 50 patients rather than 55 (normal is 15)

the idea of lessening the curve is to try to get to the point where discharges are greater than admits at 150% capacity rather than 400% capacity

also when they say hospital releases - a large portion of these are deaths

1452 "released"
397 deaths in New York state

1055 going home.
 

yort2000

Junior
Jan 23, 2007
2,267
298
0
it likely means they are operating at ~ 380% capacity rather than 400%
a few less patients in the halls - and a provider trying to direct the care of 50 patients rather than 55 (normal is 15)

the idea of lessening the curve is to try to get to the point where discharges are greater than admits at 150% capacity rather than 400% capacity

also when they say hospital releases - a large portion of these are deaths

Wrong. The discharged number is for those that got well and were discharged. I used the term released.

You are one positive person, aren't ya?
 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
Wrong. The discharged number is for those that got well and were discharged. I used the term released.

You are one positive person, aren't ya?

I can can assure you with 1000% certainty that releases included deaths. I'm not talking in general terms.
When a patient dies you "release" them to the morgue or discharge them to the morgue
 

Ewooc

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2010
6,114
3,053
0
In Italy they are saying the the number infected as well as those who have died are much much higher than the official number. Simply because people are/were getting sick and dying so rapidly that it was impossible to test everyone before they died. I have a feeling that is going to be the case in many parts of the world as well as here in the US.
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
In Italy they are saying the the number infected as well as those who have died are much much higher than the official number. Simply because people are/were getting sick and dying so rapidly that it was impossible to test everyone before they died. I have a feeling that is going to be the case in many parts of the world as well as here in the US.
True, but deaths happen behind closed doors,or all kinds, and wuhan is but a small percentage, keep that in mind.
Were there more? Likely, was it all, not even close, were people dying of something else who did have wuhan only cited towards wuhan? Yes.
But the consistency of the knowns in a modern society is still consistent enough for modeling, however, in more remote or third world scenarios, numbers will be different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.