Continued Mass Election Fraud
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
Common sense. Mail in your ballots far enough ahead of time to have it get there on time. If you are worried about mail getting lost, vote in person. If you can't vote in person (i've been in that situation before) and your ballet gets lost in the mail, then that's the way it goes. Just like if you wait until near poll closing time to drive to the polling location and your car breaks down and you never make it.
The USPS isnt' the greatest everywhere in the country but the amout of "lost" or abnormally delayed ballots should not move the needle.
This is something you'd say if you're not voter-friendly and you're suspicious that mail-in voting is full of fraud, which it's not. The goal should be to increase voter participation, not make it harder, but Republicans fear more people voting because increased turnout historically hasn't been good for them. If this is the concern, why not promote policies that incentivize voters instead of creating roadblocks to keep the totals down?
As a reminder, this wasn't considered a huge issue until Trump made it one so now we're intentionally putting sand in the gears to appease that one man. It's why he installed Louis DeJoy to intentionally gum up the works in 2020 and the USPS hasn't recovered since.
"President Donald Trump recently admitted his attacks on the United States Postal Service (USPS) are nothing short of intentional, telling Fox News that he was against funding the USPS because, “They need that money in order to make the Post Office work so it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots.”
Speaking at his daily pandemic news briefing on Aug. 12, Trump said he would not approve $25 billion in emergency funding for the Postal Service, nor $3.5 billion in supplemental funding for election resources.
“They need that money in order to make the post office work so it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots,” Trump said. “But if they don’t get those two items, that means you can’t have universal mail-in voting.” https://labortribune.com/sorting-ma...mits-undermining-usps-to-hamper-vote-by-mail/
And yet...
Of course you do. You're a right wing nut job.
"increasing voter participation" would be great if it happens but if it doesn't, it doesn't. Up to the individual if they want their voice heard, or if they don't want to be bothered and will let the rest of us take care of it for them.
Advertise, create pubic service announcements and let people know that there is an election coming up in "x" months and here are the things you should think about to ensure you are registered or receive your mail in ballot in time. I'm all for that. All for "electon day " being a federal holiday and make sure that there is a few day window so that people who have to work on that federal holiday have an alternate day. All good. I think in-person voting should be the rule. Mail in should be the exception, like it always was. We are over COVID now.
But, it's not like we have surprise pop-up elections. I think that there is a pattern. We elect a president every so many years. Elect senators and representatives every so many years. The timline is always the same. lol.
If you need your hands held to figure out what to do to vote in an election or can't backwards plan to get it done, then you don't need to be voting. Information is one thing we have a lot of. More now than ever.
I give people credit and have faith that they will figure out things that are important to them. This includes poor people, black people, female people, blue haired people, cross-dressing people, white people, any kind of people. If voting is important to them then they will do what is necessary to get it done.
Again, we were talking about mail-in voting, which hasn't proven to be full of fraud and there are multiple safeguards to keep it that way. The SAVE ACT wants to eliminate it entirely except under very narrow conditions but why do away with it if it hasn't contributed to election fraud? This has become an integral part of the way red states like Mississippi, Arizona, Utah and Alaska have traditionally voted so it will harm them too, especially Alaska where voting precincts are few and far between.
Speaking for myself, I've had jobs in the past that required me to travel on a moment's notice so though I may have planned to vote in person, I found out at the last minute I wouldn't be here and without mail-in voting, I would have been disenfranchised. It would enrage me if my mail-in vote wouldn't have arrived in time because Trump's appointee intentionally slowed the mail service at his command.
For that reason, I do think it's reasonable to allow a cushion of 3-5 days for those votes to be counted as long as they're postmarked in time. Keep in mind that in many cases they don't need to wait for all the mail-in votes to come in because the leads are so large that they know the outstanding votes won't make up the difference so this won't create an issue in every state.
This is a solution in search of a problem IMO.
Court documents show Postal Service removed 711 mail-sorting machines this year
Court testimony from top-ranking Postal Service officials indicates the agency removed 711 mail-sorting machines, roughly double the amount it usually takes out in a given year.Agency off…
thehill.com
Ok. i"m still in favor. You bring up red states .. i don't care. I'm not viewing this as a partisan issue. I'm on the side of normal, common sense, americans that want secure elections where results aren't manipulated and only citizens vote. I'm more than ok with rolling back things that maybe have been allowed in the past in order to do that.Again, we were talking about mail-in voting, which hasn't proven to be full of fraud and there are multiple safeguards to keep it that way. The SAVE ACT wants to eliminate it entirely except under very narrow conditions but why do away with it if it hasn't contributed to election fraud? This has become an integral part of the way red states like Mississippi, Arizona, Utah and Alaska have traditionally voted so it will harm them too, especially Alaska where voting precincts are few and far between.
Speaking for myself, I've had jobs in the past that required me to travel on a moment's notice so though I may have planned to vote in person, I found out at the last minute I wouldn't be here and without mail-in voting, I would have been disenfranchised. It would enrage me if my mail-in vote wouldn't have arrived in time because Trump's appointee intentionally slowed the mail service at his command.
For that reason, I do think it's reasonable to allow a cushion of 3-5 days for those votes to be counted as long as they're postmarked in time. Keep in mind that in many cases they don't need to wait for all the mail-in votes to come in because the leads are so large that they know the outstanding votes won't make up the difference so this won't create an issue in every state.
This is a solution in search of a problem IMO.
Court documents show Postal Service removed 711 mail-sorting machines this year
Court testimony from top-ranking Postal Service officials indicates the agency removed 711 mail-sorting machines, roughly double the amount it usually takes out in a given year.Agency off…
Your very specific situation is objectively not going ot move the needle at all. Unfortunate for you. Quit your job and vote, or not. Same with me when i was in the Army. The fact that you would be enraged is also a non-issue. That happens a lot with a lot of issues, so not anything special.
Look, at the margin there wil always be an issue. Someone with a sob story, or whatever. But, it's simple. Plan ahead, or vote in person. If an act of God happens, then so bad for you.
Damn dude, I'm trying to tell you we already have this but you insist on seeing the voters as criminals.
Now I can't decide between these two
No worries. Both of those are pretty good, but tbh , i liked eitehr of the previous ones better. However, I'll just use one of mine for a while. Why not?
You would not be the judge of that in this world or any you could imagine for yourself.That's cool but it makes you sound like an honorable person?
Remember all the "AID" we sent to Ukraine and Sam Bankman-fried was allegedly laundering it back to Democrats? They believe they did it again with Ukraine sending HUNDRENDS of MILLIONS of U.S. TAXPAYER dollars to the DNC to help Biden's 2024 run against President Trump. Shocker.
DNI Gabbard revealed that U.S. intelligence intercepted that they were going to disguise money marked for "clean energy" for "environmental causes," send our tax money to Ukraine, and then back to the DNC and the Biden-Harris campaign.
DNI Gabbard is digging deeper to expose the plot to see if and how much was carried out and stolen from U.S. taxpayers.
None of this is surprising and happens to this day all over the world. Why do you think every other day when Biden was in office, they were sending hundreds of millions of dollars to Ukraine? It wasn't aid. It was money laundering 101.
these kind of reports seem to come out very frequently. But if the government has evidence of this, when will the charges come?
I find it hilarious whenever Trump or Republicans tried to challenge the 2020 / 2022 elections, the Judges said "No standing" Or "Latches" applies...dismissed, or never even assigned a date for a hearing.
But when the Democrats in Fulton County or the Democrats is California want to stop the criminal Investigation of possible fraudulent ballots, the judge orders specific hearings and allows them to bring in "experts" with no expertise in this case whatsoever.
Rigged !
HOLY CRAP!! A Palm Beach elections office volunteer just got arrested for STEALING an encrypted access key and computer equipment in the March 24 special election where the Democrat won by 800 votesThis is the district the includes Mar-a-Lago.
Investigators worry that the encryption — used for training — could be reverse engineered and used to tamper with voter registration
The theft was reported on March 27, a few days after last Tuesday's special election, per WPTV. The theft occurred on March 19, just days before election day
"During the search of [John] Panicci's home, detectives recovered the stolen items along with a substantial amount of electronic and digital storage devices. Panicci was transported to the Palm Beach County Jail and booked on charges."
Election integrity is vital to our republic.
If it's happening in Florida — IT'S HAPPENING NATIONWIDE
Page 185: "The engineer who actually built the algorithm stealing the election for Biden looked at me like I was an idiot and asked, "Do you think we stole the election here in the blue counties? We're smarter than that. No, we shaved off votes in the red counties in the countryside where Trump was strong, and we left the blue counties untouched. We shaved off 10 percent in Douglas County (Colorado) and 10% in Mesa County (Colorado) and other red counties until Biden's count was over 50 percent statewide."
The purposeful and intentional influx of illegal aliens began in 2011 under Obama (UAC), not 2021 under Biden.
The objective was to gain names for ballots that would be first beta tested in California (Eric Holder legal counsel) during the 2018 mid terms.
After the 2018 mail-in ballot success, they then needed a mechanism to trigger it nationally. COVID-19 was deployed (intelligence operation) and 5-Eyes helped.
2020 was the mail-in ballot outcome. The fences around Capitol Hill and the J6 response was the visible result of fear held by the same IC who pulled it off.
Immediately following, they needed to backfill names to match ballot quantities that made zero sense and construct a cover operation. Borders were opened, names were imported.
Trump didn't "puss out", he worked his *** off to bring all of the above to the public spotlight.
Who else was capable? Who else would have even tried to confront these forces?
There are trillions at stake.
Early March the FBI sent a Federal Grand Jury subpoena to the AZ State Senate (GOP Majority) for documents related to the 2020 election.
The AZ AG Kris Mayes and AZ SOS Adrian Fontes warned AZ Counties to not comply with the Federal Subpoena. Stating there is a lawsuit to shield voter data from the Federal Government.
Fun Fact. Know who was in charge of the 2020 Election in Maricopa County which accounts for 62% of the states voters?
Adrian Fontes.
Know who changed the voting process in Maricopa County from Precinct specific polling locations to open county wide locations?
Adrian Fontes
Maricopa County is 9,224 Sq Miles roughly the size of New Hampshire but with 4x the population of 4.5 million.
Fontes changed voting from Precinct polling locations like the fire station, church or school in your neighborhood to larger venues like Community Colleges, Mega Churches across the county. Which means I could live in Cave Creek AZ and be able to vote 100 miles away in Gila Bend AZ.
What could possibly go wrong?
And now as AZ SOS what is he trying to keep the Federal Government from discovering in the 2020 election data?
Everything wrong in Arizona is in this picture Hobbs, Mayes and Fontes!
BREAKING:DOZENS OF ELECTIONS WORKERS WHO FACILITATED THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN PENNSYLVANIA have come forward claiming that they were PERSONALLY ORDERED by then Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf and Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar to TRASH A TOTAL OF OVER ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND BALLOTS CAST FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP and to count OVER ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND FRAUDULENT BIDEN BALLOTS that were cast in the names of dead voters and illegal aliens and shipped into election precincts in the middle of the night. The fraud was reportedly especially egregious in Philadelphia and was "outcome determinative"... President Trump was right that he actually WON THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND IT WAS STOLEN FROM HIM, according to these election workers. They are now warning about Democrat efforts that are already underway to try and RIG CLOSE RACES IN SWING DISTRICTS in the midterms in the commonwealth. These are STONE COLD CROOKS... ARRESTS NEED TO START NOW! 
Has this been corroborated by catturd or Gunther eagle man?
Texas voter IDs are integers. Whole numbers. No decimals, ever.
The Bexar County primary poll book contained 4,110 IDs like this:
1,253,115,467.79993
That alone proves something fishy. But the math goes further — and it’s airtight.
When those 4,110 records are sorted in order, the spacing between every consecutive pair is 22,084.82189 — the same non-integer value, repeating 4,109 times. That uniformity is already impossible by accident. Then:
90,746,533.16339 ÷ 22,084.82189 = 4,109.0000
The total span of the sequence, divided by the gap, returns a perfect integer with zero remainder. A randomly generated or accidentally corrupted sequence cannot do that. Only deliberate computation produces that result.
Every one of these fractional IDs was created after polls closed — and we can prove it from the IDs themselves. The gap value of 22,084.82189 was derived from the alphabetical positions of specific voters within the completed check-in list. Those positions cannot be known until every voter has checked in and the full list is in hand. The fractional IDs could not have existed before the genuine list existed. They are timestamped by their own construction.
The records were not random fabrications. Each was anchored to a real registered voter. 735 real people each had 5 or 6 synthetic duplicates generated in their name — up to 4,110 fraudulent ballot opportunities in a single county primary, executed by someone with back-end write access to the poll book system.
The attack vector was an internet-accessible poll book platform reachable from anywhere in the world with a valid username and password. No VPN. No hardware credential. No cryptographic verification on the export that produces the official check-in record. The post-election export workflow contains no hash check and no independent audit mechanism. Anyone with valid credentials could alter the official record for any participating jurisdiction remotely, at any time.
That access was used.
The fractional ID components functioned as a precise machine-executable deletion key — invisible to poll workers under normal display settings, but recoverable by a single database query after the fact. The injection itself broke the chain of custody. The file was then replaced before formal examination could occur, compounding an evidentiary void that was already irreversible.
Officials attributed the anomalies to an export error or electronic glitch. Neither explanation survives contact with the data. A glitch does not solve a two-equation integer system, sort 735 voters alphabetically, derive sequence endpoints from algebraic positions within that sort, and optimize its output for numerical elegance. Glitches do not have specifications. This one did. The fraud in this election is proven. The scale of its impact cannot be determined from any currently available record. An election whose outcome cannot be separated from an unknown quantity of fraudulent ballots cannot be legally certified
The same platform operates across 29 states.
The Bexar County file was caught only because it was captured during the active window before deletion. A more careful cleanup leaves nothing. The absence of detected anomalies in other jurisdictions is not evidence of integrity — it is evidence that no one was looking at the right moment.
This is not a software reliability problem. Unreliable software fails randomly. This algorithm solved a two-equation integer system, sorted 735 names alphabetically, derived its sequence endpoints from algebraic positions within that sort, and deliberately discarded six real voter records in order to produce output whose internal quantities share a common factor of 15. That is a specification. Glitches do not optimize for numerical elegance.
The conclusion is the same whether you approach it from this specific case or from my multi-state database analysis published in the Journal of Information Warfare earlier this week: electronic poll book and voter registration systems built on internet-accessible architectures with no cryptographic audit trail cannot be trusted. Not this platform. Not any platform built on the same design. Partial fixes and software patches do not solve the problem when the attack surface is the architecture itself.
The only remedy that eliminates rather than mitigates the risk is full replacement — paper poll books, hand counts conducted publicly at the precinct, results posted before anything leaves the building. A paper system cannot be altered from a laptop at 11pm by someone with a stolen password.
Peer-reviewed multi-state analysis: Journal of Information Warfare, 2026, 25.2
If you are in one of the 29 states, this concerns you.
Our elections are rigged, and our voting equipment and software are compromised.
Whistleblowers recently stated that our election software is still being certified when they know for a fact that they are indeed compromised and massive criminal activity is happening within the precincts and at the state level in our elections.
Here it is:
King Solomon Reporting—drops another bomb
“I believe that the President of the United States is soon going to be briefed by @DNIGabbard and other intelligence officials about additional Significant Large-Scale Intrusions into various forms of our ELECTION SYSTEMS..Doming rigging systems.
“I’m talking about — getting enough voter data on the basis that a FOREIGN power could work with people on the ground in the US to fill out fake registrations of people on dirty voter rolls. Those licenses being sent into Chicago were going to be used to make absentee ballot applications.
And if a Foreign power got that far into our election databases, the next question becomes — WHO WERE THEY
WORKING WITH ON THE GROUND?”
NON Governmental Democrat Funded Organizations. NGOS.
Chuck Schumer: “If Republicans pass the SAVE AMERICA ACT, Millions of people will be removed from the Voter Rolls.”Total votes in 2020: 155,508,985
Total votes in 2024: 140,306,875
Where did 15,202,110 voters go?
That’s over 15 million mail in ballots.
OVER 6,000,000 INELIGIBLE VOTER REGISTRATIONS REMOVED!! That’s not a typo. That’s not a rounding error.
That’s millions of names that never should have been on voter rolls in the first place.
And this didn’t come from some fringe group - this came from lawsuits and legal enforcement by Judicial Watch under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).
WHAT WERE THESE “VOTERS”?They weren’t legitimate, active voters. They were:
~ Dead individuals
~ People who moved away years ago
~ Dormant/inactive registrations sitting untouched for cycles
~ Felons or otherwise disqualified individuals
And in broader enforcement discussions - potential non-citizen registrations
These fall under NVRA Section 8, which REQUIRES states to clean their voter rolls.
Not optional. REQUIRED.
HERE’S WHERE IT GETS MESSYThese aren’t small clerical cleanups. Look at the scale:
OREGON (2026) → 800,000 registrations flagged
~160,000 already eligible for removal
~640,000 additional inactive records sitting there since ~2017
NEW YORK CITY → 918,139 removed
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA → 1,200,000+ removed
KENTUCKY → ~735,000 removed
COLORADO → 372,000 removed
WASHINGTON, DC →
~65,500 removed
~38,000 additional removed
~73,500 marked inactive
Additional actions across Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Ohio, and others
LET THAT SINK IN
That’s not one state.
That’s not one mistake.
That’s a nationwide pattern.
And here’s the kicker:
These are just the names that were forced to be cleaned up AFTER legal action Not votes cast Not prosecutions Just registrations that never should have existed or remained active
WHY THIS MATTERSStates are legally required to maintain accurate voter rolls under federal law.
But in many cases?
They didn’t act… until they were dragged into court.
According to TOM Fitton, this has become a “historic achievement for clean elections” - but also proof that millions more questionable registrations may still exist nationwide.
THE REAL QUESTION
If millions of ineligible names sat on voter rolls for YEARS…
Who allowed it?
Why did it take lawsuits to fix it?
And how many are STILL there right now?
This isn’t about left vs right.
This is about basic system integrity.
Because if you can’t trust the rolls…
You can’t fully trust the outcome.