Confederate War Monuments

treetiger

Heisman
Jan 17, 2005
22,613
20,118
103
gogetem says, "Too long, and riddled with inaccuracy to boot."

Don't just like (LOVE!) when someone tells you (or historians) that they are wrong, without supplying the 'who, what, why, where, when'? gogetem likely feels, "who cares about the real facts" when it is against my preconceived notions!
 
  • Like
Reactions: m_l_murphy

Transference

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2010
113,925
4,978
0
By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.
He would have been had the revolutionaries lost, but we aren't British so he was a god damned war hero and founding father of our nation.

The whole notion of allowing monuments for the south after they lost the Civil War is ridiculous. What if British loyalists ran around erecting King George III statues or Mexican-Americans threw up Santa Ana plaques everywhere? Would you be pissed if we were taking those down now?...Probably not, becuase the entire premise is absurd.
 

nextoffensivecoord

All-American
Jan 22, 2008
4,790
5,615
113
"I read these threads and all I can think about it how terrible it would be to be trapped in a real life conversation with states rights guy talking about the civil war."

Spoken like a true narrow minded liberal. Reminds me of the Jack Nicholson statement, "you can't handle the truth"
It really rustles my jimmies that you do not know how to use the quote feature.

And that is aside from your general point of view on life and Clemson sports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Mixed Mamba
Nov 20, 2003
1,328
610
0
By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.

Exactly! I don't understand why it is so hard to understand the meaning of the word "traitor". What the h*ll was treasonous about the south? They were doing awful sh*t like slavery, but it was LEGAL at that time, the north was a bunch of hypocrites because they had laws to disenfranchise blacks, just to a lesser degree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKOTiger

treetiger

Heisman
Jan 17, 2005
22,613
20,118
103
Transference said:
Political opinion and protests are one thing, but to wage war and only to lose is another. There should be no monuments to traitors.
By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.

Touche!!! It will be fun seeing a liberal try and work his way out of that corner!

 

treetiger

Heisman
Jan 17, 2005
22,613
20,118
103
It really rustles my jimmies that you do not know how to use the quote feature.

And that is aside from your general point of view on life and Clemson sports.

You cannot think of a logical argument point for the topic, so you drive in the left lane, and not even being in England! What a puss! I hope this does not "rustle" your panties?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steven15

clemsonrandy

All-American
Oct 26, 2007
22,848
9,472
98
Don't be fooled by a definition under Wikipedia. A civil war is a violent internal conflict between factions within the same regime to control all or part of the government. There was no internal conflict between the norther and southern states in the southern secession. The war started only after the northern states refused to accept or acknowledge that succession.

Had the south won the war, there is no doubt it would today be called a revolution (similar to the US revolution) as opposed to a civil war. To the victor goes the spoils, and thus it's been named a civil war. But make no mistake about it, this was not civil unrest against a monarchy, as in Great Britain in the 1800s where actual neighbor, friend and families fought against each other for the control of a central government. There was no civil unrest. There was no attempt to take over all or part of the us government. The southern states simply voted and chose to withdraw from the Union. As in the revolutionary war, the northern states said no, which led to the violent conflict. Our civil war is more appropriately described, by definition, as a failed revolution.
We fought with England for independence from 1775-1781 and then again 1812-14 when the Royal Navy foolishly began to impress our sailors on the high seas.
 

Spare Jock

Hall of Famer
Aug 6, 2010
73,110
206,738
113
Transference said:
Political opinion and protests are one thing, but to wage war and only to lose is another. There should be no monuments to traitors.
By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.

Touche!!! It will be fun seeing a liberal try and work his way out of that corner!

i cant take you seriously until you learn how to use the basic features of this simple message board
 

slingle

Senior
Jun 29, 2006
1,818
489
83
The first of these four monuments being taken down is the Liberty Monument.

It has this inscription on it: "United States troops took over the state government and reinstated the usurpers but the national election of November 1876 recognized white supremacy in the South and gave us our state."
 

treetiger

Heisman
Jan 17, 2005
22,613
20,118
103
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.” (Abraham Lincoln)
 

cufan1

Heisman
Aug 15, 2001
7,143
18,509
113
You're comparing war to an individual fight?

We can test out your question at the Wachovia of your choice if you like

 

CUAngler

All-Conference
Jan 16, 2005
4,544
2,559
0
The first of these four monuments being taken down is the Liberty Monument.

It has this inscription on it: "United States troops took over the state government and reinstated the usurpers but the national election of November 1876 recognized white supremacy in the South and gave us our state."

It should make a lot people sick inside seeing the heritage of those white supremacists being blatantly disregarded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slingle and cufan1

MKOTiger

Heisman
Jun 10, 2006
14,189
12,806
113
He would have been had the revolutionaries lost, but we aren't British so he was a god damned war hero and founding father of our nation.

The whole notion of allowing monuments for the south after they lost the Civil War is ridiculous. What if British loyalists ran around erecting King George III statues or Mexican-Americans threw up Santa Ana plaques everywhere? Would you be pissed if we were taking those down now?...Probably not, becuase the entire premise is absurd.

We fought in a Vietnam war where the majority of the us citizens didn't agree with it. Protesters threw blood on our soldiers, yet we honor those that lost their lives with monuments. We vanquished thousands of Indian s from their land and destroyed their civilization, and I certainly would not mind a monument to Geronimo and others that fought bravely to protect and preserve their way of life. I live in Charlotte and see a statue honoring the queen every flight I take. It doesn't bother me. I'm proud of it.

More importantly, Do you really believe that Robert E Lee is a traitor because he believed that his state had a legal right under the constitution to secede? There is no prohibition in the constitution for succession. The southern states simply did what they believed was their legal right. The northern states then took up arms against the south. How can you say these people are traitors? Yo need to review that term.
 

clemsonrandy

All-American
Oct 26, 2007
22,848
9,472
98
i cant take you seriously until you learn how to use the basic features of this simple message board
Interestingly, the British don't see Washington as a traitor as King George after the war thought that he had to be a special person when he didn't want a third term or stay on as a king.A bust of Washington is in St.Paul's Cathedral in London.Some traitor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKOTiger

Spare Jock

Hall of Famer
Aug 6, 2010
73,110
206,738
113
Interestingly, the British don't see Washington as a traitor as King George after the war thought that he had to be a special person when he didn't want a third term or stay on as a king.A bust of Washington is in St.Paul's Cathedral in London.Some traitor.
ironic post to respond to there Randy
 

cufan1

Heisman
Aug 15, 2001
7,143
18,509
113
Exactly! I don't understand why it is so hard to understand the meaning of the word "traitor". What the h*ll was treasonous about the south? They were doing awful sh*t like slavery, but it was LEGAL at that time, the north was a bunch of hypocrites because they had laws to disenfranchise blacks, just to a lesser degree.

Here's the thing...only losers of wars are considered traitors.
 

gooddogjudge

Heisman
Jan 28, 2005
21,652
32,666
113
What is ironic is the fact that it wasn't even a "civil" war. What most don't understand (taught in our schools anyway) is a civil war is a war for control over one central government. The war between the States was a war because some States simply wanted to secede and the others forced them to stay. The southern States wanting to secede had no desire to take control over the northern States government.

Any human being in their right state of mind inherently knows that human bondage is a bad thing and should forever be outlawed in any society. Greed, power, etc. are the only desires keeping it alive. The vast majority of southern white people during that time frame were not even slave owners, they simply couldn't afford to be. As a matter of fact, depending what State it was, blacks were as likely to own slaves as whites were, human capital has been a way of life for thousands of years just like prostitution (a version of human capital) has been.

Personally, I could care less about any monuments that romanticize government initiated wars, the ones started by the people are usually for good reason.

You are exactly right . Civil war in this case is a misnomer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKOTiger

OrangeForever

Senior
May 29, 2001
13,315
863
0
Confederates: Domestic terrorists. Insurgent punks who got their asses kicked up past their shoulder blades.

Every confederate monument and every confederate flag should be burned.

Your great great great grandpappy got his *** kicked by the glorious Union. The south will not rise again and confederate sympathizers are no better than ISIS.
 

SpillerTime

All-American
Aug 29, 2006
2,434
6,431
113
Confederates: Domestic terrorists. Insurgent punks who got their asses kicked up past their shoulder blades.

Every confederate monument and every confederate flag should be burned.

Your great great great grandpappy got his *** kicked by the glorious Union. The south will not rise again and confederate sympathizers are no better than ISIS.
Now that is how you troll.
 

TigerDoc

Heisman
Nov 4, 2001
22,654
17,648
111
Four Civil War monuments are being removed in New Orleans because this War and it's monuments are considered racist. It will not be long before all Confederate monuments in the south will face the same fate. What is next, the elimination of Confederate cemeteries and grave markers? It seems many just do not care to get a better historical understanding of ALL events that led to this war!

Decisions made based on nothing more than pure emotion are better left unmade, no matter whether they are left, center, or right leaning...
 

MKOTiger

Heisman
Jun 10, 2006
14,189
12,806
113
Confederates: Domestic terrorists. Insurgent punks who got their asses kicked up past their shoulder blades.

Every confederate monument and every confederate flag should be burned.

Your great great great grandpappy got his *** kicked by the glorious Union. The south will not rise again and confederate sympathizers are no better than ISIS.
You, sir, are ignored.
 

bobpins2

Senior
Nov 6, 2001
858
636
93
Political opinion and protests are one thing, but to wage war and only to lose is another. There should be no monuments to traitors.
Hey, dude go pound sand, if read the other post, these guys were fighting for the right to secede, which at that time was legal. They were not traitors.
 

anon1753124268

Heisman
Dec 10, 2013
29,897
85,435
63
Any mention of treason yet? If not, treason.

Oh, and they were just mad their candidate lost. Toughen up. Quit relying on the govt.