By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.Political opinion and protests are one thing, but to wage war and only to lose is another. There should be no monuments to traitors.
By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.Political opinion and protests are one thing, but to wage war and only to lose is another. There should be no monuments to traitors.
I really can't believe you didn't get more traction out of this.The South got their *** kicked, to the winners go the spoils and say in how things are done.
He would have been had the revolutionaries lost, but we aren't British so he was a god damned war hero and founding father of our nation.By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.
It really rustles my jimmies that you do not know how to use the quote feature."I read these threads and all I can think about it how terrible it would be to be trapped in a real life conversation with states rights guy talking about the civil war."
Spoken like a true narrow minded liberal. Reminds me of the Jack Nicholson statement, "you can't handle the truth"
By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.
We fought with England for independence from 1775-1781 and then again 1812-14 when the Royal Navy foolishly began to impress our sailors on the high seas.Don't be fooled by a definition under Wikipedia. A civil war is a violent internal conflict between factions within the same regime to control all or part of the government. There was no internal conflict between the norther and southern states in the southern secession. The war started only after the northern states refused to accept or acknowledge that succession.
Had the south won the war, there is no doubt it would today be called a revolution (similar to the US revolution) as opposed to a civil war. To the victor goes the spoils, and thus it's been named a civil war. But make no mistake about it, this was not civil unrest against a monarchy, as in Great Britain in the 1800s where actual neighbor, friend and families fought against each other for the control of a central government. There was no civil unrest. There was no attempt to take over all or part of the us government. The southern states simply voted and chose to withdraw from the Union. As in the revolutionary war, the northern states said no, which led to the violent conflict. Our civil war is more appropriately described, by definition, as a failed revolution.
i cant take you seriously until you learn how to use the basic features of this simple message boardTransference said: ↑
Political opinion and protests are one thing, but to wage war and only to lose is another. There should be no monuments to traitors.
By that definition, George Washington is a traitor.
Touche!!! It will be fun seeing a liberal try and work his way out of that corner!
![]()
For those interested they're a Confederate museum in downtown Greenville that will teach you the history of the conflict.
You're comparing war to an individual fight?
We can test out your question at the Wachovia of your choice if you like
The first of these four monuments being taken down is the Liberty Monument.
It has this inscription on it: "United States troops took over the state government and reinstated the usurpers but the national election of November 1876 recognized white supremacy in the South and gave us our state."
He would have been had the revolutionaries lost, but we aren't British so he was a god damned war hero and founding father of our nation.
The whole notion of allowing monuments for the south after they lost the Civil War is ridiculous. What if British loyalists ran around erecting King George III statues or Mexican-Americans threw up Santa Ana plaques everywhere? Would you be pissed if we were taking those down now?...Probably not, becuase the entire premise is absurd.
Interestingly, the British don't see Washington as a traitor as King George after the war thought that he had to be a special person when he didn't want a third term or stay on as a king.A bust of Washington is in St.Paul's Cathedral in London.Some traitor.i cant take you seriously until you learn how to use the basic features of this simple message board
ironic post to respond to there RandyInterestingly, the British don't see Washington as a traitor as King George after the war thought that he had to be a special person when he didn't want a third term or stay on as a king.A bust of Washington is in St.Paul's Cathedral in London.Some traitor.
Exactly! I don't understand why it is so hard to understand the meaning of the word "traitor". What the h*ll was treasonous about the south? They were doing awful sh*t like slavery, but it was LEGAL at that time, the north was a bunch of hypocrites because they had laws to disenfranchise blacks, just to a lesser degree.
What is ironic is the fact that it wasn't even a "civil" war. What most don't understand (taught in our schools anyway) is a civil war is a war for control over one central government. The war between the States was a war because some States simply wanted to secede and the others forced them to stay. The southern States wanting to secede had no desire to take control over the northern States government.
Any human being in their right state of mind inherently knows that human bondage is a bad thing and should forever be outlawed in any society. Greed, power, etc. are the only desires keeping it alive. The vast majority of southern white people during that time frame were not even slave owners, they simply couldn't afford to be. As a matter of fact, depending what State it was, blacks were as likely to own slaves as whites were, human capital has been a way of life for thousands of years just like prostitution (a version of human capital) has been.
Personally, I could care less about any monuments that romanticize government initiated wars, the ones started by the people are usually for good reason.
Now that is how you troll.Confederates: Domestic terrorists. Insurgent punks who got their asses kicked up past their shoulder blades.
Every confederate monument and every confederate flag should be burned.
Your great great great grandpappy got his *** kicked by the glorious Union. The south will not rise again and confederate sympathizers are no better than ISIS.
Four Civil War monuments are being removed in New Orleans because this War and it's monuments are considered racist. It will not be long before all Confederate monuments in the south will face the same fate. What is next, the elimination of Confederate cemeteries and grave markers? It seems many just do not care to get a better historical understanding of ALL events that led to this war!
No dronesYou're comparing war to an individual fight?
We can test out your question at the Wachovia of your choice if you like
You, sir, are ignored.Confederates: Domestic terrorists. Insurgent punks who got their asses kicked up past their shoulder blades.
Every confederate monument and every confederate flag should be burned.
Your great great great grandpappy got his *** kicked by the glorious Union. The south will not rise again and confederate sympathizers are no better than ISIS.
Hey, dude go pound sand, if read the other post, these guys were fighting for the right to secede, which at that time was legal. They were not traitors.Political opinion and protests are one thing, but to wage war and only to lose is another. There should be no monuments to traitors.
My favorite poster and it's not closeTried to tell you folks @treetiger was good at trolling
My favorite poster and it's not close
Wachovia? How about First Union instead?You're comparing war to an individual fight?
We can test out your question at the Wachovia of your choice if you like
You, sir, are ignored.