actually I would argue total roster turnover makes a GM MORE important, and potentially impactful...especially for a program like us, shopping at the Dollar Store, vs Nordstrom's. Player evaluation is critical as we have few dollars to spend, so have to invest wisely. And that means scouting and scouring all sources, to find those rare players that can perform well (based on evaluation of short term potential) and are in our budget.We need 15 mil and that ain't happening. I know people are talking chump change of 10 mil but that does not buy you into the tourney.
Doesn't mean we will be successful, if "success" is measured in making the Tourney, as in this current world our odds of making the Tourney are negligible and we can pretty much state that for every season, roster unseen, but if you define "success" as making the most out of bare resources, a GM will play a big role in that.
In fact, one could argue that a GM is more important than a coach who can "develop" players...they only stay for 1 year so development value is marginalized. You need to maximize return in the 1 season they are here. Also means....you can basically run them into the ground...if you choose...they are not here for the long term.
Wonderful world this new college basketball is...
And how soon can we drop the "college" part of this sham?