Toggle sidebar

***CC22 and the Fever mega thread***

K

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
3,008
5,482
113
EvilMonkeyInTheCloset said:
I know you have me blocked, but I'll share all this nonetheless.




























You were saying?.........
Click to expand...

SO, what was the narrative when Stewie scored 34 on the Fever last time and she shot 19 for TWENTY ONE from the charity stripe? I guess it must of been the white girl thing as well, but funny we never heard a thing about that......
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: Amahawk, EvilMonkeyInTheCloset, Hawkosx and 4 others
K

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
3,008
5,482
113
Hawksfor3 said:
I would agree with this in the general sense because I believe it is factual. And to just add to this comment, I'll say two things. First, folks will always "Tune In" to their favorite commentors. Some will do so for useful commentary and information. Others will follow along to hear information that will satisfy their "Itching Ears".

Secondly, folks who have a specific feeling about someone or some topic will gravitate toward the commentary that reinforces those feelings. And, another aspect of commentary are redundancies. This commentor "Parrots" off of the original story, and so on. And then, many of them endorse each other publicly (Which adds up to perpetuation). The important thing is to exercise discernment, but with all of the various opinions out there, it can be a pretty slick environment to navigate. Listening to both sides of commentary, and then forming an opinion is nice, but doesn't address bias in some form or another by the consumer.

In other words, the info and the commentary's out there. Common sense and research can help. But, good old common sense goes a long way.
Click to expand...
So just like our political system? Sorry....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawksfor3
K

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
3,008
5,482
113
2D said:
Because disparaging fans for posts during a game that are both warranted and backed up with legitimate statistics is a ***** move and adds nothing to the conversation. The difference in this game was the Fever actually played defense in the paint in the second half and the fact that Sabrina was a non-factor in their outside threat. CC was traveling, Mitchell was airballing, Billings and Boston were getting blocked every other possession, totally justified at the time doubting the team could win this one. This was proof that the Fever can win if they play defense, which is not often.
Click to expand...
Well, they are 16-10 and in 5th I believe so they must be doing something.....
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: EvilMonkeyInTheCloset and The Big Z
K

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
3,008
5,482
113
EvilMonkeyInTheCloset said:
But she can play 200 mph and shoot unconsciously.......most of the time.
Click to expand...
And YET with all the hoopla she averages a point or so per game more then Clark and CC averages 8 assists and 5-6 boards to Mitchell probably at 2 and 2? I wonder who the recipient of many of Clarks assists are. Hmmm, bet its the other two leading scorers on the team...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amahawk and EvilMonkeyInTheCloset
K

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
3,008
5,482
113
WDSMHawk said:
Overall win-loss record can be misleading.

Three of New York's wins during the 2024 season (two of which where 30+ point blowouts) came in CC's first 11 games as a pro before she got her legs under her in the W and built any chemistry with AB and KM.

Two of New York's wins last year came in games CC didn't play in.
Click to expand...
Uh, oh. Someone entered some context into the discussion. Refreshing......
 
  • Like
Reactions: EvilMonkeyInTheCloset and The Big Z
K

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
3,008
5,482
113
Hawk-A-Doodle-Doo said:
KM and CC are very good complementary players.

Mitchell is fast, has good handles, can put pressure on the defense, can shoot well (when she's shooting well), and plays very good defense, especially given her diminutive stature. Her three-point shooting has been very good this year and her midrange jumper has always been considerably better and more consistent than CC's. Oh, and don't discount the sneaky value of her being left-handed in a league that is 90-ish percent righties.

Clark has good handles (giving them two legit point guards, which is huge in this league), can shoot (and make) from virtally anywhere which forces the D to play well beyond the arc, is beginning to much more fully value going to the hole and playing through contact, and is, perhaps most importantly, an otherworldly passer. The value of that is almost incalculable because when she's shooting well the D can't sag even a little bit (#thatswhatshesaid), opening up the lane for others to be on the receiving end of said passes. And when her shot's a little off, she's still deadly dangerous to the opposition by using her passing skills to manufacture points that others simply cannot match (fastest ever to 200 assists).

You know you're one of the greats in the sport when people claim 17 points and 7 assists in only 26 minutes on the court while still getting healthy from a back injury constitutes a "terrible performance". In a weird sort of way, that's actually a compliment.
Click to expand...
Too add she maintains nearly that same level of gravity whether she is shooting well or not because she CAN light it up at anytime and teams don't ever want to let her get up a head of steam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldhawk56 and The Big Z
Hawk-A-Doodle-Doo

Hawk-A-Doodle-Doo

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2001
830
2,326
93
Kceasthawk@77 said:
Too add she maintains nearly that same level of gravity whether she is shooting well or not because she CAN light it up at anytime and teams don't ever want to let her get up a head of steam.
Click to expand...
Exactly. She's always a threat to put it in the hole from any angle, or she can penetrate. It's why you never see any sagging Ds even when she's not strokin' it in her usual way.

Wait.

Are we still talking about basketball?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: EvilMonkeyInTheCloset, eyesofhawk, Hawkosx and 4 others
T

The Big Z

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2023
1,856
3,582
113
Hawk-A-Doodle-Doo said:
Exactly. She's always a threat to put it in the hole from any angle, or she can penetrate. It's why you never see any sagging Ds even when she's not strokin' it in her usual way.

Wait.

Are we still talking about basketball?
Click to expand...
Hawk-A-Doodle-Doo said:
Exactly. She's always a threat to put it in the hole from any angle, or she can penetrate. It's why you never see any sagging Ds even when she's not strokin' it in her usual way.

Wait.

Are we still talking about basketball?
Click to expand...
I'd argue that Mitchell and Clark have the 2 best step backs in the league. Mitchell's is so effective because she's so quick she can also drive right past you so you have to give her a step or 2 which makes her step back lethal. CC is obviously not as quick as Mitchell but clearly is an incredible ball handler so they can guard her a little bit tighter which I'm sure is also why she was able to be so effective with her step back. Both are great at it.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Amahawk, EvilMonkeyInTheCloset, Hawksfor3 and 3 others
A

Anon1751457816

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
913
1,685
93
Hawk-A-Doodle-Doo said:
Exactly. She's always a threat to put it in the hole from any angle, or she can penetrate. It's why you never see any sagging Ds even when she's not strokin' it in her usual way.
Click to expand...
Beavis And Butthead Lol GIF by Paramount+
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hawkeyewx
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom