Cals offense still blows

School boy

All-Conference
Oct 29, 2007
5,506
3,865
0
Duh he didn't being in someone to teach good ball movement cuts and just overall offense. The coaching staff we have can't coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

Blueworld_3.0

Heisman
Sep 23, 2008
14,127
11,256
113
I've been preaching this for several years. When Calipari always had superior talent, his teams won running a simple motion designed to create mismatches. Against equal or superior competition, that approach doesn't work. We have ZERO plays designed to get specific players open shots. ZERO.
 

UKSanders_rivals37733

All-American
Jan 1, 2003
8,634
8,736
0
I've been preaching this for several years. When Calipari always had superior talent, his teams won running a simple motion designed to create mismatches. Against equal or superior competition, that approach doesn't work. We have ZERO plays designed to get specific players open shots. ZERO.

He was also able to mask it further because those elite level athletes played great defense, which allowed them to overcome when the offense wasn’t clicking. That great defense created lots of transition buckets, which also masked poor offensive scheme.
 

Blueworld_3.0

Heisman
Sep 23, 2008
14,127
11,256
113
He was also able to mask it further because those elite level athletes played great defense, which allowed them to overcome when the offense wasn’t clicking. That great defense created lots of transition buckets, which also masked poor offensive scheme.
That's an excellent point.
This is a transitional team. Those who looked at this roster and saw a Final Four run were fooling themselves. This is a 22-23 win team. A Sweet 16 run would be over-achieving.
 

Bluesbrother

All-American
May 23, 2002
4,610
6,543
113
We take shots with hands in our faces more than any team in the country.

Duke……does not.
K is serious about the job he does, Cal is not. Cal depends on his line of BS to keep his inability to coach from being exposed any worse than it already has. He's great at talking but not much else. He is paid very well for it too which is not a good look for Barnhart, especially considering Cal has a lifetime contract. Barnhart should be fired for that boneheaded decision.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
We have some severe passing issues. Any offense is going to blow until those are sorted out.
 

Panthur

Heisman
Aug 5, 2008
9,225
12,782
0
not a good look for Barnhart, especially considering Cal has a lifetime contract. Barnhart should be fired for that boneheaded decision.
Cal may be able to redeem himself; imo Barnhart cannot. That $$$$$$$$$$ lifetime contract gave away our future and gained us nothing. I went ape&&&t when they inked it and got a ban here. I’m proud of that now.
 

Bluesbrother

All-American
May 23, 2002
4,610
6,543
113
I've been preaching this for several years. When Calipari always had superior talent, his teams won running a simple motion designed to create mismatches. Against equal or superior competition, that approach doesn't work. We have ZERO plays designed to get specific players open shots. ZERO.
Cals recruiting sales pitch is stale and not working like it once did. Recruits aren't buying it apparently so superior talent we don't have. Cal can't make adjustments and the talent is declining while unfortunately expectations are still high among the fans. Sounds like fans are going to be in for some long-term disappointment. Maybe that's why Cal suggested early on that fans focus on player's draft status rather than win/loss records and NC's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

ManitouDan_anon

Heisman
Dec 7, 2006
20,073
32,434
0
I've been preaching this for several years. When Calipari always had superior talent, his teams won running a simple motion designed to create mismatches. Against equal or superior competition, that approach doesn't work. We have ZERO plays designed to get specific players open shots. ZERO.
Case in point .. Grady was on fire for a stretch , then he went a loooooong stretch where he didnt get a shot period , and even rode the pine for a while . I know his D wasn't great , but three's cover up some bad D . Its 2021 not 1987 . Truth is Cal acts like he is unmotivated to change . Wonder Why ?
 

numberonedad

Heisman
Sep 16, 2009
6,684
13,840
0
Cal has always put all his eggs in one basket. That basket being get the best players. And when he doesn't it shows his deficiencies
 

KyCatFan1

Heisman
May 6, 2002
30,867
31,594
113
Case in point .. Grady was on fire for a stretch , then he went a loooooong stretch where he didnt get a shot period , and even rode the pine for a while . I know his D wasn't great , but three's cover up some bad D . Its 2021 not 1987 . Truth is Cal acts like he is unmotivated to change . Wonder Why ?
 

Aike

Heisman
Mar 17, 2002
75,451
46,418
90
I thought Duke adjusted better in the second half to take away shooters. The counter was Wheeler driving to the basket, which was less productive, especially with a shot blocker down low.

Wheeler became more out of control and got tunnel vision. He got sped up. He got to the point that he didn’t recognize shooters when they were open.

If Cal wants to play this way, probably need TyTy carrying a lot of the point guard load. More likely to penetrate with TyTy and get defense to leave Wheeler than vice versa. And TyTy should be more adept at finishing in traffic.

That being said, the version of TyTy we saw last night wasn’t capable of playing this way. He seemed like he was caught in between all night. Trying to make plays that weren’t there, and looking ugly in the process. At least he wasn’t turning the ball over.

Anyway...not sure we have the athleticism to play the way Cal wants. That was a tough test against strength, and we graded out in the C/D range.

We’re in a weird spot. Bunch of good but not great players. Shooters on the bench who I’m sure look at the result last night and think they should be on the floor. Ragtag guys like Mintz and Wheeler who give you a puncher’s chance, but do they know how to play winning basketball? Feels a bit like fool’s gold with them.