point stands, at the time of the BCG hire he was seen as a upcoming star coach. So UK ran off a title winning coach in Tubby Smith, and made a errant hire. No big name coach would want to coach that dumpster fire, right? In comes cal. UK goes on probation and loses all their stars in 1989 a NBA coach comes to UK to rebuild the program. UK attracts top coaches, period.
But the point is meaningless. Nobody ever said we would never be able to hire another good coach, just that you wouldn't get a good coach after Tubby in light of running him off, and guess what, we didn't.
If Cal leaves this year, we will not likely get a really good coach to follow him. The only way I can see getting a good coach to follow him is if he retires, and even that will be hard to do. The trend for hiring coaches at UK isn't by coincidence. Generally you will get a good, not great coach to follow a great one. That coach won't meet expectations they end up moving on, and you end up with a coach with issues. That coach with issues creates an environment where a great coach can come in and restore the once great program, along with firing a coach with justifiable cause, and you end up with a great coach.
The other side is, when moving on from a coach with issues, you can do it under your own terms, which means there is more time to survey and understand who you can get. The other coaching changes usually happen all at once, and you end up with a scramble to find somebody to coach.
The realistic options for this year just aren't very good. There are a couple of decent coaches out there, but they don't appear ready for UK. The ones that would be ready for UK aren't likely to listen to a pitch to become coach over their current jobs. While Cal makes a little over 8 mil/yr, he didn't start out there. He started out at under 4, and because of performance, his salary increased. Yes, UK can pay more than anyone else, but we aren't likely going to throw that kind of money to a new hire. The number is going to be substantially lower, as it should be.