Bush 41 voting for Hillary
- Thread starter RichardPeterJohnson
- Start date
I don't need that mental image this early in the morning...or any time of the day really.
Here's a military vet, ex-Prez, ex-CIA Director, ex-US Ambassador who puts the country ahead of his party. How any intelligent person who cares about the US could vote Trump is beyond me. I don't much care for Hillary but she is miles more qualified than loose-cannon Trump.
The very fact that Trump's leading competitors in the GOP primary, Cruz and Kasich aren't supporting him either really says a lot. I always admired the elder Bush. Unfortunately, his intellect seemed to have skipped a generation.
Any national Republican politician that votes for her and doesn't either vote for Johnson or write-in a candidate loses respect in my book, and only contributes to the ever growing problem.
When Trump won the GOP primary, I think you can pretty much toss the concept of 'respect' from anything that party says or does.
And yet, you voted for her in the Primary when you had a chance to vote for someone representing your values. Just another sheep.
Again you idiots bought into a bad story
Jim McGrath, a Bush family spokesman, told the Guardian: “The vote President Bush will cast as a private citizen in some 50 days will be just that: a private vote cast in 50 days. He is not commenting on the presidential race in the interim.”
Jim McGrath, a Bush family spokesman, told the Guardian: “The vote President Bush will cast as a private citizen in some 50 days will be just that: a private vote cast in 50 days. He is not commenting on the presidential race in the interim.”
The system is broken when the Dems push through Hillary for the sake of pushing through Hillary (it's her time ********, let's ignore the potential crimes she committed) and when the Reps push through Trump (let's ignore the fact he's crazy and not a Republican).
Should Donald win, the Dems only have themselves to blame for nominating a loser, should Hillary win the Reps only have themselves to blame for nominating a loser. This election could have been a game changer.... instead it's....
You will vote for her because you like everything she stands for. You always intended to vote for the *****.
I agree. Hillary should have faced stronger competition but nobody showed up to run against her. But the GOP had a strong field and somehow Trump happened which is a bigger problem. Your voters basically said your party sucks and we want a pompous TV personality to lead our country. All the values of the tea party movement, conservative politics, freedom coalition got shitcanned for a guy who wouldn't know conservative politics from a shovel.The system is broken when the Dems push through Hillary for the sake of pushing through Hillary (it's her time ********, let's ignore the potential crimes she committed) and when the Reps push through Trump (let's ignore the fact he's crazy and not a Republican).
Should Donald win, the Dems only have themselves to blame for nominating a loser, should Hillary win the Reps only have themselves to blame for nominating a loser. This election could have been a game changer.... instead it's....
Was this ripped directly from Drudge's twitter account or was this on his web page?
So, you are taking the word of a Kennedy on Facebook. One of the most corrupt families ever. I guess you believed ted's account at Chappaquiddick.
The hate for Hillary from the right apparently trumps everything else. These people would vote for Saddam hussein over hillary.
Absolutely. Trump is so far removed from any core GOP values and he happened because the GOP voters wanted 'non of the above' in the party. No thank you.
No, I vote for the most reasonable person in the race.
Not if you keep someone from getting to 270 electoral votes.
Why would I vote for someone that I don't want to vote for...just because you or some other libtard says I should?
So you're hoping to trow the election to the House? Pipe dream. Your vote for Johnson is a tacit vote for Trump. You should be smart enough to see that. Trump is a loose cannon who can't be trusted as CiC.
No, my vote for Johnson is because he aligns more with my beliefs, AND he's an honest and sincere candidate.
Breaking 270 may be a pipe dream now, but had Reps like Bush 41, Romney, etc., been smart, they could have thrown their weight behind Johnson and accomplished something.
Well they didn't and your vote for Johnson will help Trump be elected. Biting your country's nose off to teach its face a lesson.
I can not in good conscious vote for a criminal like Hillary. I say you're voting to cut the country's nose off to teach it a lesson as well by supporting and voting for corruption.
Oh geez! Enough with the"criminal" talk. HC is the most scrutinized candidate in history. Countless Congressional investigations have yielded no charges. Special prosecutors have come up with nothing in their multi-million dollar investigations. And as much as you folks want it to be true, she's never been convicted of anything. She's secretive, she's been investigated, she's told some lies, and some folks got killed in a CIA operation in Benghazi while she headed state dept. Oh, and then there's the innuendo...Vince Fosters death, billing records, commodities trading. All disqualify her in your mind. She's the boogie man! But we all know that if we limited the candidates to those who've had a record as pure as the driven snow, we'd have nobody to run the country.
That's a pipe dream. You think the House won't vote for their party's nominee? Laughable.
They definitely would vote for Trump. I'm not sure why this is being questioned.
Govt investigating itself, definition of a conflict of interest. She is criminal and giving people access to classified emails who didn't have clearance, Sidney Rosenblum, is the definition of criminal activity.
You mean Sidney Blumenthal.....the Clinton crony that started the Obama birther question in 2008?
That's laughable. So you're saying that in the multiple congressional investigations on Benghazi and emails/servers, the Republicans doing the investigating are trying to protect her? Asinine.
I hear this all the time now. They're convinced this is a giant coverup.
